Time |
Nick |
Message |
01:24 |
|
fling joined #minetest |
01:49 |
|
sec0nd joined #minetest |
03:35 |
|
Sven_vB_ joined #minetest |
03:51 |
|
ivon joined #minetest |
04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
04:54 |
|
fling joined #minetest |
05:27 |
|
Fusl joined #minetest |
05:32 |
|
debiankaios joined #minetest |
05:40 |
|
mrgreymatter joined #minetest |
05:46 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest |
06:32 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
07:10 |
|
TomTom joined #minetest |
07:17 |
|
specing joined #minetest |
08:18 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest |
08:47 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest |
08:54 |
|
Bombo joined #minetest |
08:54 |
|
Bombo joined #minetest |
08:55 |
sfan5 |
<luatic> I believe sfan5 should write down some very basic rules for the server list |
08:55 |
sfan5 |
well then someone should help draft some |
09:04 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> sfan5: Sure |
09:08 |
|
Lesha_Vel joined #minetest |
09:13 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> I can't come up with any rules despite all information must be truthful :P |
09:14 |
erle |
“bots must not be counted in total player amount reported” |
09:14 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> "All information submitted to the serverlist must be truthful. In particular boosting the serverlist rating through the use of bots is forbidden." |
09:18 |
sfan5 |
you're thinking of this the wrong way, it should be more like "The server owner has the responsibility to assure within reasonable bounds that the player count reported corresponds to the amount of human players on the server." |
09:23 |
erle |
what measure is a non-human? |
09:23 |
erle |
https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/WhatMeasureIsANonHuman |
09:35 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
09:43 |
|
fling joined #minetest |
10:42 |
|
definitelya joined #minetest |
11:24 |
MTDiscord |
<MisterE> How could you avoid reporting bots? |
11:25 |
|
lemonzest joined #minetest |
11:36 |
sfan5 |
you couldn't, that's sort of an issue |
11:37 |
erle |
well, you can not yet |
11:37 |
rubenwardy |
With luatics wording, you could get a server banned by joining with the username "2_plus_2_is_5" |
11:42 |
MTDiscord |
<MisterE> Well, until its possible to not report players to the serverlist, I suggest not messing with such rules |
11:57 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
12:47 |
|
definitelya_ joined #minetest |
13:24 |
|
definitelya joined #minetest |
13:49 |
MinetestBot |
[git] sfan5 -> minetest/minetest: Improve code in mapblock_mesh.cpp a bit 5d26ac0 https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/5d26ac00883eed2f522e6e0fa3adcd7081814c9b (2022-05-26T13:49:12Z) |
13:49 |
MinetestBot |
[git] sfan5 -> minetest/minetest: Get rid of global buffer that would ruin concurrent MapBlock serializ… 9a01581 https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/9a01581cdd3cb54750e9fe4a065aa435262d5225 (2022-05-26T13:49:12Z) |
13:49 |
MinetestBot |
[git] sfan5 -> minetest/minetest: Reduce size of ContentFeatures structure 8b74257 https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/8b74257bf3cbb54e78614ac6aaaba79adf75cc8e (2022-05-26T13:49:12Z) |
13:59 |
erle |
how likely is it to fail if someone stores references to player in a globally accessible way? i mean, as long as the player is there |
14:00 |
sfan5 |
zero |
14:00 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> Then can we get an API guarantee? |
14:01 |
Pexin |
i want a server that exists for player-run bot wars. also a public bot api. maybe someday.... |
14:02 |
Pexin |
who here has played colobot? |
14:06 |
erle |
luatic, what is an API guarantee? |
14:13 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> Basically just this being documented in the Lua API |
14:40 |
|
specing joined #minetest |
14:43 |
erle |
luatic getting it guaranteed makes it impossible to change it later hehe |
14:44 |
|
x2048 joined #minetest |
15:23 |
|
beanzilla joined #minetest |
15:34 |
|
x2048 joined #minetest |
15:57 |
|
eggman joined #minetest |
16:41 |
|
debiankaios joined #minetest |
17:33 |
|
Alias joined #minetest |
17:39 |
|
sec0nd joined #minetest |
18:04 |
|
Talkless joined #minetest |
18:13 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
18:16 |
|
sobkas joined #minetest |
19:00 |
|
___nick___ joined #minetest |
19:15 |
|
eggman joined #minetest |
19:16 |
|
specing_ joined #minetest |
19:42 |
|
Markow joined #minetest |
19:43 |
sfan5 |
has anyone noticed that singleplayer map loading is a bit in recent dev builds? |
19:44 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> Missing a word there? |
19:45 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> If slow, not really, but haven't tested anything heavy. |
19:48 |
sfan5 |
+slow yes |
19:48 |
sfan5 |
sometimes when joining only the mapblock i'm in loads and the rest takes one or two seconds |
19:53 |
|
___nick___ joined #minetest |
19:56 |
|
___nick___ joined #minetest |
20:02 |
sfan5 |
might be related to active blocks |
20:02 |
sfan5 |
? |
20:23 |
|
erle joined #minetest |
20:30 |
MinetestBot |
[git] x2048 -> minetest/minetest: Force-update shadows when the world is changed (#12364) ef22c02 https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/ef22c0206f225dbccd67bff9fb888867c63039b3 (2022-05-26T20:28:34Z) |
20:44 |
|
appguru joined #minetest |
21:12 |
|
gff joined #minetest |
21:19 |
settl3r[m] |
Has there ever been an attempt to create a permadeath *ultra-hardcore* pvp server in Minetest? |
21:19 |
settl3r[m] |
Healing would only be possible with special items, such as golden apples (from rare healing trees) or red kalite ore (from gloop_ores mod), it would take real balls to play there... only the best would survive. |
21:20 |
settl3r[m] |
And such a server would use any mob mods in existence, even goblins (which can dig through materials like dirt, sand, gravel, clay etc.) |
21:21 |
settl3r[m] |
it would be quite the experience, and very adrenaline-heavy :D |
21:22 |
settl3r[m] |
Caves and caverns would finally be scary again and every night would be creepy ^^ |
21:24 |
settl3r[m] |
if i had the resources i would love to host such a server.. |
21:24 |
settl3r[m] |
* to host & play such a |
21:26 |
settl3r[m] |
The server could even reward player-killing by granting level-ups or giving out prices, such as gold, diamonds etc. |
21:27 |
settl3r[m] |
This change would turn it into... quite something ^^ |
21:28 |
settl3r[m] |
The server would of course use a setting which massively limited player visibility, to eg. 50-100 meter distance for player tags. |
21:28 |
sfan5 |
does that concept work even if you consider that people will just rejoin with a different acocunt once they die? |
21:28 |
settl3r[m] |
* to eg. max. 50-100 meter |
21:29 |
settl3r[m] |
then they would have to start from scratch again |
21:29 |
settl3r[m] |
and lose all items they had |
21:29 |
settl3r[m] |
and anybody could loot their corpse |
21:29 |
settl3r[m] |
it could use the 'Yolo' mod |
21:31 |
settl3r[m] |
(there is a server which uses a similar setting, but with food-healing enabled) |
21:31 |
settl3r[m] |
my proposal would make it extra-tough |
21:33 |
settl3r[m] |
maybe the server could pick randomly one of these rewards for a pvp-kill: |
21:33 |
settl3r[m] |
1 diamond Or 1 gold lump Or 1 mese crystal fragment Or 1 mithril lump Or 1 titanium lump |
21:34 |
settl3r[m] |
(this bonus item would be in the corpse inventory and ready to be looted) |
21:34 |
settl3r[m] |
the most precious item would be the least likely to appear and vice versa) |
21:35 |
settl3r[m] |
..or it could depend on the level of the killed player! |
21:36 |
settl3r[m] |
and there could be a Hall of Fame table, which everyone could view, with a command in chat, where the top-20 pvp players were listed. |
21:40 |
settl3r[m] |
or it could give out these bonus items, depending on the time the killed player survived: |
21:40 |
settl3r[m] |
1 Minetest-day: 1 titanium lump |
21:40 |
settl3r[m] |
2 MT-days: above plus 1 gold lump |
21:41 |
settl3r[m] |
4 MT days: above plus 1 mithril lump |
21:41 |
settl3r[m] |
8 MT days: above plus 1 mese crystal fragment |
21:41 |
settl3r[m] |
16 MT days: above plus 1 mese crystal instead |
21:41 |
settl3r[m] |
32 MT days: above plus 1 diamond |
21:42 |
settl3r[m] |
..everybody would be hunting the top-surviving player ^^ |
21:44 |
settl3r[m] |
..combined with the most dangerous mobs active, i wonder if anyone could survive for longer than a MT-year in such a setting.. |
21:45 |
settl3r[m] |
* a MT-year (which is >300 RL hours!) in such |
21:46 |
settl3r[m] |
* a MT-year (which is >120 RL hours) in such |
21:48 |
settl3r[m] |
at 64 MT days survival time of the killed player it could reward with a mese block and at 128 MT days it would give out a full diamond block :) |
21:50 |
settl3r[m] |
oh that would of course imply, that multi-accounters would be banned without warning. |
21:51 |
settl3r[m] |
* would be (IP-range-)banned without |
21:51 |
settl3r[m] |
* would be (IP-range-)banned without, * without warning, to prevent self-farming cheating. |
21:52 |
settl3r[m] |
(the server would then ban the full IP range of X.#.#.#, with X being the offenders top IP number) |
21:52 |
settl3r[m] |
* (the server would then ban the full IP range of X.Y.#.#, with X.Y being the offenders top IP numbers) |
21:54 |
settl3r[m] |
(When dying, only that account name would get banned, but not the IP.) |
21:56 |
MTDiscord |
<Inevaaa> Hello, I have seen the free hosting offer of a Robert "the old coder" can you tell me your experiences? |
21:57 |
MTDiscord |
<Inevaaa> I think it's great the idea but somehow it sounds weird to me |
22:01 |
sfan5 |
old former community member who was banned years ago for harassing, (attempting to) dox and threatening legal action against other community members and core developers |
22:03 |
MTDiscord |
<Inevaaa> Oh okay thx, than i doesn't need to try it. Because the website is a bit "scary" too from him |
22:03 |
|
Sven_vB joined #minetest |
22:03 |
sfan5 |
releases a fork of minetest called "Final Minetest" which is really just a long outdated version (Minetest 0.4, last released 2018) with minimal changes |
22:03 |
sfan5 |
thats about everything that can be said |
22:06 |
MTDiscord |
<Inevaaa> Oki, no problem. I'm happy about this little information too... I think I better not accept his offer. Thanks again! |
22:06 |
|
sys4 joined #minetest |
22:08 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest |
22:34 |
|
panwolfram joined #minetest |
23:32 |
|
AliasAlreadyTake joined #minetest |