Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:50 |
|
erlehmann joined #minetest |
00:51 |
|
AliasAlreadyTake joined #minetest |
01:15 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
01:20 |
|
specing_ joined #minetest |
01:36 |
|
erlehmann joined #minetest |
02:25 |
|
Hawk777 joined #minetest |
02:56 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
03:29 |
|
queria^clone joined #minetest |
03:33 |
|
queria^clone joined #minetest |
04:34 |
|
IceDragon joined #minetest |
04:46 |
|
grouinos joined #minetest |
05:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
05:00 |
|
Extex joined #minetest |
05:20 |
|
dabbill_ joined #minetest |
06:01 |
|
riff-IRC joined #minetest |
07:00 |
|
dabbill joined #minetest |
07:08 |
|
luk3yx left #minetest |
07:32 |
|
CWz joined #minetest |
07:35 |
|
dabbill_ joined #minetest |
08:52 |
|
olliy joined #minetest |
09:08 |
|
grouinos joined #minetest |
09:27 |
|
luk3yx joined #minetest |
09:33 |
|
dabbill joined #minetest |
10:00 |
|
GNUHacker joined #minetest |
11:29 |
|
jvalleroy joined #minetest |
12:13 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
12:27 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest |
12:27 |
|
Sven_vB_ joined #minetest |
12:31 |
|
jluc joined #minetest |
12:39 |
|
est31 joined #minetest |
12:40 |
|
grouinos joined #minetest |
12:56 |
|
definitelya joined #minetest |
13:20 |
|
specing_ joined #minetest |
13:39 |
|
kamdard_ joined #minetest |
13:43 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
14:14 |
|
calcul0n_ joined #minetest |
14:17 |
|
unexploredtest[m joined #minetest |
14:18 |
wsor4035 |
erlehmann: moving here from dev irc, im not sure at what stage of completion i should make my game public. probably just yolo it at some point |
14:18 |
wsor4035 |
but for now its private, and im not warr1023 :p |
14:18 |
wsor4035 |
s/3/4 |
14:26 |
erlehmann |
ok |
14:26 |
erlehmann |
wsor4035 put it on git? |
14:29 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> always been on a git platform, just in a private repo |
15:06 |
|
Boingo joined #minetest |
15:19 |
|
Andrew_ joined #minetest |
15:57 |
definitelya |
wthael erlehmann o_o |
15:57 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest |
15:58 |
|
Extex joined #minetest |
16:01 |
definitelya |
ah, for the Discord crew, he made a funny in the exit mex. |
16:05 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
16:06 |
|
Sven_vB joined #minetest |
16:14 |
|
Sven_vB joined #minetest |
16:19 |
|
Sven_vB joined #minetest |
16:34 |
|
Sven_vB_ joined #minetest |
16:46 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #minetest |
16:47 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #minetest |
16:50 |
|
chilledfrogs joined #minetest |
17:00 |
|
appguru joined #minetest |
17:27 |
|
johs1 joined #minetest |
17:28 |
|
basxto joined #minetest |
17:30 |
|
absurb joined #minetest |
17:51 |
|
grouinos joined #minetest |
18:08 |
|
johs1 joined #minetest |
18:11 |
|
Talkless joined #minetest |
18:12 |
MinetestBot |
[git] octacian -> minetest/minetest: Lua API: Add `rmdir`, `cpdir` and `mvdir` (#9638) cbf658f https://git.io/JXMw7 (2021-11-10T18:10:20Z) |
18:12 |
MinetestBot |
[git] sfan5 -> minetest/minetest: Fix compiler detection in buildbot c510037 https://git.io/JXMw5 (2021-11-10T18:10:32Z) |
18:30 |
|
johs1 joined #minetest |
18:41 |
|
independent56 joined #minetest |
18:42 |
independent56 |
Do my ports look fine? |
18:42 |
independent56 |
https://imgur.com/a/WHCkkxn |
18:43 |
independent56 |
TCP/UDP is my nuke solution, it works fine for the default port |
18:43 |
independent56 |
https://imgur.com/a/23qMWjX |
18:45 |
independent56 |
Conencting locally,and getting the same issues |
18:46 |
independent56 |
"independent56independent56:~$ minetest --server --world '/home/independent56/hades' --logfile "./hades log $(date +"%d %m %Y %T").txt" --gameid hades_revisited --config $PWD/hades.conf --port 30002 |
18:46 |
independent56 |
" |
18:46 |
independent56 |
Does this look alright? |
18:47 |
|
erlehmann joined #minetest |
18:48 |
independent56 |
(portwise) |
18:49 |
independent56 |
It starts fine, just always timesout. |
18:55 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> timeout usually means that there's some kind of firewall (or nat) blocking traffic |
18:55 |
independent56 |
Time is short i cannot stayonsite any longer |
18:55 |
independent56 |
I am connecting locally |
18:56 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> And you're able to connect? I mean will it timeout after establishing connection or does not seem to get any reply |
18:57 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> I'd check games/mods if connection succeeds but times out very soon or even before being able to complete joining |
18:59 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> If it simply times out without being able to connect server at all then looking at firewall and if you do actually use correct route (often seen setups where external name wont really work from localhost...) |
19:00 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> Because of routing, nat or firewall... if you're not trying to connect to actual localhost then try that to verify. |
19:05 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> Just noticed probable dns name in previous messages, you probably have that configured in nat box as that looks like nat config page. If so and you don't have direct mapping on localhost for that name then getting there using name almost sure wont work, can be done by forwarding traffic back using router but that does not really make sense... |
19:07 |
|
johs1 joined #minetest |
19:09 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> (assuming linux that means your external name in /etc/hosts mapped to 127.0.0.1) |
19:12 |
|
johs1 joined #minetest |
19:27 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
19:28 |
|
sparky4 joined #minetest |
19:42 |
|
___nick___ joined #minetest |
20:10 |
|
CWz joined #minetest |
20:15 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
20:22 |
|
Extex joined #minetest |
20:34 |
|
garywhite joined #minetest |
20:34 |
|
garywhite joined #minetest |
20:36 |
|
Extex joined #minetest |
20:48 |
|
Extex joined #minetest |
20:57 |
Chompy |
I wonder if its possible for the server to generate lower LOD models for distant nodes |
21:01 |
Calinou |
this was attempted a while go with client-side "farmesh" systems, but it never really looked good and was slow |
21:01 |
Calinou |
a while ago* |
21:02 |
Calinou |
since it was client-side, it also didn't account for different mapgen on the server side or large user-made builds |
21:06 |
|
independent56 joined #minetest |
21:06 |
independent56 |
Hello all |
21:06 |
independent56 |
Thank you SX, i will run through the diagnosis |
21:07 |
independent56 |
How do i allow more then one player on the server connecting from the same computer? I get a database lock when i try to multijoin. |
21:08 |
|
Extex joined #minetest |
21:09 |
independent56 |
Ok, turns out it was "local map saving" |
21:09 |
independent56 |
Thank god |
21:10 |
sfan5 |
independent56: why do you have one "for minetest" and then two different other entries? |
21:11 |
independent56 |
First was for my first server, and the others for my two toher servers |
21:12 |
independent56 |
I forgot to change the name,and i am too lazy |
21:12 |
independent56 |
https://imgur.com/a/1lILiQa |
21:12 |
independent56 |
Dual playing :-) |
21:18 |
sfan5 |
that configuration is only correct if those servers run on different devices |
21:18 |
independent56 |
0_0 |
21:19 |
independent56 |
Do i do range 30000 to 30002? (i wish i could use standard form, like 3.0002e4, but that would miss the vital port numbers Maybe 3e4+2?) |
21:20 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> There's different ports and looking at startup command there's also different directories for servers... |
21:20 |
independent56 |
;_; |
21:20 |
independent56 |
my servers are far too organic-growing |
21:21 |
independent56 |
But all my server worlds are in the ~ directory |
21:22 |
sfan5 |
independent56: if you say only port 30000 works that must mean the configuration shown in your first screenshot is faulty and useless |
21:23 |
independent56 |
Hmm, i mean that 30001 and 30002 are broken, but the rest are fine. port 80? fine. Port 20? fine. |
21:23 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> Are you actually running 3 different servers on same machine or just single server? |
21:23 |
sfan5 |
why don't you make your 30001/30002 entries look like the 30000 one? |
21:24 |
independent56 |
Wait until you find out i keep my NML and Hades servers running through crontab |
21:24 |
independent56 |
3 different minetest servers on the same physical computer |
21:25 |
independent56 |
And i will make them look the same when i'm back onsite, on Friday afternoon GMT. |
21:26 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> But 2 names for that machine? sfan5 prob also talking about that -main after what is presumably server name which is not for port 30000 nat |
21:27 |
sfan5 |
you can proxy over ssh to access the router config remote you know |
21:27 |
independent56 |
0_0 |
21:27 |
independent56 |
Wow, i never knew! |
21:28 |
independent56 |
I need to try that |
21:29 |
independent56 |
SImplest way? |
21:29 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> ssh port forwarding is similar to one on your router nat config |
21:30 |
independent56 |
what does "nat" mean? |
21:30 |
sfan5 |
ssh -D 5050 <your usual host> |
21:30 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> something like -L localhost:8080:router-internal-ip:80 for web interface |
21:30 |
sfan5 |
then you go into firefox's configuration and enter 127.0.0.1:5050 as SOCKS5 proxy |
21:30 |
independent56 |
wow |
21:30 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> (or actual proxysuggested by sfan5) |
21:30 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> I like port forwarding more so I don't need to change proxy configs |
21:31 |
independent56 |
Where doi execute "-L localhost:8080:router-internal-ip:80" |
21:31 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> that's for ssh command, added to normal login command |
21:32 |
independent56 |
Can you put it in full? |
21:32 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> and unlike with sfan5's proxy option with -L you then have to connect web broser to http://127.0.0.1:8080 |
21:33 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> ssh -L localhost:8080:router-internal-ip:80 memyserver.org |
21:33 |
independent56 |
Was doing ssh me@..:80 |
21:34 |
|
sparky4_ joined #minetest |
21:34 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> 8080 is local port, 80 is remote target port. Port forwarding has to be enabled on server shhd config, usually it is by default. If your router want to use ssl then change 80 to 443 |
21:35 |
independent56 |
I hate networking |
21:36 |
independent56 |
Both physical and compuer science |
21:37 |
independent56 |
oooh, its doing something |
21:37 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> proxy option suggested by sfan5 is bit simpler if you use it often, for most temporary use cases port forwarding is nice as it is is direct |
21:38 |
sfan5 |
directly forwarding might also not work depends on what the end host expects/verifies |
21:38 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> but it is not as flexible |
21:39 |
independent56 |
Well, it isn't doing what i want and i am quite tired. |
21:41 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> I'd suggest trying proxy instead as with direct port forwarding you'd want to know exactly what you're doing, proxy is more flexible after you have tunnel up |
21:41 |
independent56 |
Fine |
21:44 |
independent56 |
I wish i didnt have to do sysadmin to get Minetest working :p. Now i have to use networking |
21:44 |
independent56 |
oh,it's just loaded |
21:44 |
independent56 |
Dear god it'sdrealy slow |
21:45 |
|
independent56 joined #minetest |
21:46 |
MTDiscord |
<SX> well learning few things might be useful later too, port forwarding and proxying through ssh are very little things but sometimes very useful :) |
21:47 |
independent56 |
Ah yeah. |
21:47 |
independent56 |
It makes a remote server easy to manage (citation: me) |
21:51 |
independent56 |
If i ever get a sysadmin job, i would like the title "script supervisor", where i program in perl but alsodo sysadmin. More likely i will be having to deal with ransomware onoutdated windows servers. |
22:02 |
independent56 |
Ooh, it's finally letting meaccess the ports |
22:02 |
independent56 |
So 30000 beggining, and 30002 ending? |
22:05 |
independent56 |
I updated the port forwarding now... yay! |
22:11 |
independent56 |
Ha! It works! Yay!! |
22:11 |
independent56 |
thank you all so much! |
22:12 |
independent56 |
The pain of networking is worth it. Social media is instant gratification, netowrking is delayed gratification |
22:18 |
independent56 |
Both servers are online... together! https://imgur.com/a/39HdbZz |
22:40 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
22:53 |
|
grouinos joined #minetest |
22:57 |
|
sagax joined #minetest |
23:00 |
|
Sven_vB joined #minetest |
23:09 |
|
definitelya left #minetest |
23:10 |
|
independent56 joined #minetest |
23:35 |
MTDiscord |
<MisterE> Is there a way to send a client active object to a single client using a little c code? Just curious |
23:35 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
23:59 |
|
Sven_vB joined #minetest |