Minetest logo

IRC log for #minetest, 2021-05-20

| Channels | #minetest index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:08 specing_ joined #minetest
00:15 ungali is there an active #minetest there?
00:15 MTDiscord <entuland> there is
00:16 ungali might as well take the jump now
00:16 cheapie ungali: There is, yes.
00:16 ungali it
00:17 ungali s a shame though
00:17 MTDiscord <entuland> the cycle of things ?
00:22 ungali joined #minetest
00:22 ungali joined #minetest
00:23 ungali joined #minetest
00:23 ungali joined #minetest
00:33 sysadmin joined #minetest
00:38 kamdard joined #minetest
00:45 MTDiscord <Jonathon> shame libera doesnt bridge to matrix (that i know of)
00:56 Kimapr joined #minetest
00:57 Kimapr2 joined #minetest
01:09 pgimeno left #minetest
01:36 Hawk777 joined #minetest
02:28 Pexin joined #minetest
02:42 whosit joined #minetest
02:51 Surfer2011 joined #minetest
02:57 epoch joined #minetest
03:02 specing Would be nice if we also lost the discord bridge in the process
03:10 Kimapr2 why? is the discord bridge bad?
03:11 cheapie specing: I mean... it doesn't seem to be there yet, so there's still hope :P
03:11 MTDiscord <Kimapr> the discord bridge is here
03:15 specing Discord is a proprietary chat network, so it would be hilarious if Minetest were to keep bridging to it after migrating to libera chat because freenode became proprietary
03:17 specing And, it is also funny that all these projects (Minetest included?) that depend on GitHub, a proprietary closed-source social coding network, are migrating to libera chat
03:17 specing My face is red from all the facepalming
03:20 epoch where the like button in this IRC thing?
03:20 MTDiscord <Warr1024> Apparently freenode became "proprietary" back in 2017 and people just managed to keep it subtle up until lately.
03:28 Quiark specing: now consider all those cryptocurrency projects that have big mouths about "decentralisation" and then use Medium, Telegram and/or Discord
03:31 specing yes, hypocrisy all around
03:31 specing Minetest is not free software
03:31 specing Minetest is free software in license only.
03:31 specing the spirit is dead
03:31 specing if there ever was a spirit, but probably not.
03:34 Seirdy joined #minetest
03:49 whosit joined #minetest
03:50 Quiark I don't blame people for not having time to work for free on something
04:00 MTDiscord joined #minetest
04:24 MTDiscord <Jordach> Quiark: >not mentioniung signal
04:24 Quiark No signal never claimed anything about decentralisation
04:25 Quiark But a lot of people are projecting that on them as if it was the solution to all problems.
04:26 MTDiscord <Jordach> shitpost: use iMessage for minetest communications
04:27 MTDiscord <Jordach> call me a madman but the FSF should've foresaw freenode getting rekt years ago
04:28 sec^nd joined #minetest
04:53 sofar FSF isn't relevant for freenode
04:54 sofar and FSF is irrelevant nowadays almost anyway as well
05:18 nm0i joined #minetest
05:25 MTDiscord <GreenXenith> re: Discord bridge: 99% chance of staying
05:35 MTDiscord <Benrob0329> It's funny seeing people any non-Discord platform complain about Discord, and people on Discord complain about literally any other platform. Funny how people forget that it's ok to have different priorities than each other.
05:35 MTDiscord <Benrob0329> *people on
05:42 MTDiscord <Benrob0329> Personally, I want to move because I like the (previous) Freenode staff and feel that they will have the community's best interests in mind long-term.
06:00 Flabb joined #minetest
06:00 hlqkj1_ joined #minetest
06:07 hlqkj1 joined #minetest
07:02 jonasbits joined #minetest
07:21 jonasbits joined #minetest
07:33 jonasbits joined #minetest
07:37 uroboro joined #minetest
07:46 MTDiscord joined #minetest
07:57 Kimapr joined #minetest
07:59 jonasbits joined #minetest
08:00 ShadowNinja joined #minetest
08:01 Kimapr_ joined #minetest
08:17 jonasbits joined #minetest
08:42 FeXoR joined #minetest
08:48 freshreplicant[m left #minetest
08:51 hlqkj joined #minetest
09:14 SwissalpS joined #minetest
09:15 proller joined #minetest
09:20 MTDiscord1 joined #minetest
09:21 MTDiscord2 joined #minetest
09:25 MTDiscord3 joined #minetest
09:37 TC01 joined #minetest
09:38 MTDiscord4 joined #minetest
09:40 MTDiscord5 joined #minetest
09:42 MTDiscord joined #minetest
09:42 justcommenting joined #minetest
09:43 justcommenting > Would be nice if we also lost the discord bridge in the process
09:43 justcommenting we should actually add more bridge to more platform instead of losing any of existing bridge
09:43 justcommenting people should be allowed to use whatever platform they like and still be able to participate in the discussion
09:43 Kimapr_ joined #minetest
09:43 justcommenting being all-elite and insisting on just one platform is not healthy at all, that's called 'segregration'
09:43 justcommenting not everyone would want to install IRC client just for one specific project when they already have other platform installed for all other projects
09:47 justcommenting left #minetest
09:51 bingfengzs joined #minetest
09:52 z812 joined #minetest
09:53 z8121 joined #minetest
09:54 z812 joined #minetest
09:54 z812 joined #minetest
10:01 MTDiscord joined #minetest
10:13 MTDiscord7 joined #minetest
10:19 erlehmann joined #minetest
10:33 proller joined #minetest
10:47 ghoti_ joined #minetest
10:54 sysadmin joined #minetest
11:09 proller joined #minetest
11:43 ghoti_ joined #minetest
11:47 hlqkj joined #minetest
11:51 proller joined #minetest
12:05 ghoti_ joined #minetest
12:05 specing_ joined #minetest
12:16 ghoti_ joined #minetest
12:17 Verticen joined #minetest
12:17 newbie joined #minetest
12:17 mrkubax10 joined #minetest
12:18 mrkubax10 left #minetest
12:38 ghoti joined #minetest
12:43 ghoti_ joined #minetest
12:45 newbie joined #minetest
12:52 ghoti joined #minetest
12:53 hlqkj_ joined #minetest
12:55 newbie joined #minetest
12:58 hlqkj joined #minetest
13:00 sec^nd joined #minetest
13:00 est31 joined #minetest
13:00 Sven_vB joined #minetest
13:00 twoelk joined #minetest
13:02 ghoti_ joined #minetest
13:05 sys4 joined #minetest
13:12 ghoti joined #minetest
13:19 ghoti_ joined #minetest
13:29 proller joined #minetest
13:29 kamdard joined #minetest
13:33 proller joined #minetest
13:38 ghoti joined #minetest
13:51 n_to joined #minetest
13:52 est31 joined #minetest
13:53 hlqkj joined #minetest
13:54 ghoti_ joined #minetest
13:56 proller joined #minetest
14:02 olliy_ joined #minetest
14:07 gera joined #minetest
14:19 Fixer joined #minetest
14:37 Sokomine joined #minetest
14:45 proller joined #minetest
14:47 Kimapr_ joined #minetest
15:04 Kimapr_ joined #minetest
15:16 GreenXenith joined #minetest
15:32 mransom_ joined #minetest
15:34 mransom_ joined #minetest
15:51 mransom_ joined #minetest
16:20 Soni left #minetest
16:31 * twoelk is somehow reminded of the childrensbook hero Noddy
16:56 hlqkj1 joined #minetest
16:59 Talkless joined #minetest
17:01 SwissalpS joined #minetest
17:04 twoelk left #minetest
17:05 Hawk777 joined #minetest
17:08 hlqkj1_ joined #minetest
17:09 appguru joined #minetest
17:13 Hawk777 joined #minetest
17:25 hlqkj joined #minetest
17:49 cheapie left #minetest
17:52 Fixer_ joined #minetest
18:20 absurb joined #minetest
18:28 proller joined #minetest
18:34 hlqkj_ joined #minetest
19:13 sysadmin joined #minetest
19:20 I_am_6r1d joined #minetest
19:22 Noisytoot joined #minetest
19:31 proller joined #minetest
19:32 Flabb joined #minetest
19:52 Zander_200 joined #minetest
19:52 Zander_200 hi
20:15 nm0i left #minetest
20:46 hlqkj_ joined #minetest
21:03 BrBridge joined #minetest
21:04 benrob0329 joined #minetest
21:05 BrBridge joined #minetest
21:05 benrob0329 test
21:06 BrBridge success!
21:06 BrBridge failure!
21:06 BrBridge well, one of the two
21:06 BrBridge No nicks, I'd think that would be a default settings but I suppose not
21:09 BrBridge joined #minetest
21:13 BrBridge joined #minetest
21:13 BrBridge <b​enrob0329>Test
21:13 benrob0329 Test2
21:13 BrBridge <b​enrob0329>I forgot the space, but at least it works
21:17 BrBridge joined #minetest
21:19 BrBridge joined #minetest
21:20 benrob0329 Is Libera giving anyone else trouble at the moment?
21:21 rubenwardy no?
21:21 benrob0329 hmm
21:21 benrob0329 Maybe the server near me is just having issues, or it's my network
21:23 Verticen joined #minetest
21:25 BrBridge joined #minetest
21:25 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> test
21:25 benrob0329 There we go
21:27 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> Discord bridge ignores it (as expected, both should send notices) but I can always add the Discord to this bridge is GreenXenith wants it all to be homogeneous
21:27 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> *if
21:28 rubenwardy what is that?
21:28 benrob0329 Bridge to Libera, was suggested and approved by C55
21:29 benrob0329 (only approved by, was not suggested by C55)
21:30 benrob0329 https://irc.minetest.net/minetest-hub/2021-05-20#i_5821807
21:31 benrob0329 I haven't added -hub yet because I want to make sure this is working properly before tying it to an account and dealing with autovoice
21:33 BrBridge <e​ntuland> oh, I thought it was for Discord, so it's bridging to the-other-place-that-shalt-not-be-mentioned? eheheh
21:34 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> For now, yes. I may add other official spaces to it as well in the near future but for now this is fine
21:34 BrBridge <e​ntuland> cool
21:40 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> benrob0329: The Discord bridge doesnt ignore it, its just not bridged here yet
21:41 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> It's also down atm, dunno if that's intentional or not
21:41 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> It is not intentional, no..
21:42 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> Will the bridge you have work the same as the current bridge?
21:43 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> As in send messages to Discord via Webhooks? Yes.
21:43 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> its an intense of https://github.com/42wim/matterbridge
21:43 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> Can it send to the 3 channels already?
21:44 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> I don't have -hub added yet because I don't want to deal with autovoice right this sec, but yes
21:44 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> I don't have staff anywhere on IRC anymore so I can't do that without someone like VE lending a hand
21:46 MTDiscord joined #minetest
21:47 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> a
21:47 GreenXenith b
21:47 MTDiscord <GreenXenith> c
21:47 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> Fair enough
21:47 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> We can adjust it later, I dont have time or energy to work with this right now
21:48 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> It works and that's all that matters
21:51 MTDiscord <entuland> noice
21:54 benrob0329 joined #minetest
21:54 Elouin joined #minetest
21:54 BrBridge <e​ntuland> wow that was quite a delay ahahah
21:54 BrBridge <e​ntuland> 2 minutes flat :P
21:54 BrBridge <e​ntuland> aaaand we'll get people calling other people BrBridge in addition to MTDiscord :P
21:54 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> Now what happened
21:54 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> Is it just me or are both bridges choking
21:55 BrBridge <e​ntuland> your messages went through instant to Discord on my end
21:55 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> Yeah, after a while
21:55 BrBridge <e​ntuland> and mine as well just went through immediate now
21:55 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> I think Libera is choking a bit
21:55 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> Cant imagine why :)
21:55 MTDiscord <entuland> yeah eheheh
21:55 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> Definitely not because of the sudden rush of new people
21:55 BrBridge <e​ntuland> maybe it was just a temp hiccup, now it's quick both ways
21:56 BrBridge <G​reenXenith> Oh man I only just now noticed the <BrBridge> <MTDiscord> <entuland>  this is getting out of hand, now there are 3 of them :D
21:56 BrBridge <e​ntuland> :P
21:56 BrBridge <V​anessaE> [05-20 17:56] <GreenXenith> Oh man I only just now noticed the <BrBridge> <MTDiscord> <entuland>  this is getting out of hand, now there are 3 of them :D
21:56 BrBridge <V​anessaE> now there are 6 ;)
21:57 MTDiscord <GreenXenith> yikes x)
21:57 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> Apparently there's a draft IRCv3 RELAYMSG spec for spoofing nicks, dunno if Libera or Freenode supports it though
21:57 BrBridge <e​ntuland> the discord one used to rename itself to match the sender on the other side
21:57 BrBridge <e​ntuland> I guess that's not feasible here on IRC
21:57 MTDiscord <GreenXenith> It still does
21:57 MTDiscord <GreenXenith> You just have to be speaking from Freenode for it to do so atm
21:58 BrBridge <e​ntuland> on Discord all the messages are sent as BrBridge on my end
21:58 BrBridge <e​ntuland> ah sorry, I missed that bit
21:58 MTDiscord <GreenXenith> Because BrBridge is the one bridging from Libera to Freenode
21:59 MTDiscord <GreenXenith> so anythingon Libera shows up on Freenode from BrBridge so MTDiscord displays it from BrBridge :]
21:59 MTDiscord <GreenXenith> Dont worry its totally not confusing at all
21:59 BrBridge <e​ntuland> eheheh
21:59 olliy_ joined #minetest
21:59 BrBridge <e​ntuland> well, as lont as it doesn't loop it's already great :P
21:59 BrBridge <e​ntuland> s/lont/long
22:00 Sven_vB joined #minetest
22:01 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> Could be worse, I could be bridging joins/parts too :P
22:02 proller joined #minetest
22:02 BrBridge <S​oni> there's a CTCP for spoofing nicks
22:02 BrBridge <S​oni> (please don't use it)
22:04 MTDiscord <VanessaE> do like kaeza's hexchat script does for Minetest IRC bots:  <botname> <username>  blahblahblah  gets shortened to username@bot_abbreviation blahblah
22:04 BrBridge <S​oni> https://github.com/SoniEx2/CTCP-S/blob/master/ctcp-s.md#forward
22:04 rubenwardy left #minetest
22:04 BrBridge <S​oni> (please don't use it. altho if you do, put it at the end of the message instead of the start.)
22:04 MTDiscord <VanessaE> er shortened to <username@bot_abbreviation> blahblah
22:05 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> I'm hoping for either the RELAYMSG draft or the Display Name draft to become standard
22:05 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> client-only tags > CTCP
22:06 BrBridge <S​oni> benrob0329: CTCP > waiting decades for server-side support
22:06 MTDiscord <VanessaE> for example, <KAYLRP@VEBL> How are you?    is how that person's chat looks coming from my Banananananananaland server
22:06 BrBridge <S​oni> (also do either of those half-assed specs actually support nested bridges?)
22:08 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> I mean, IRCv3 has gotten decent support for universally helpful things like SASLv3 and Capability Negotiation
22:09 BrBridge <S​oni> yeah but it never goes far enough
22:09 BrBridge <S​oni> there's no IRCv3 server-specific emoji for example
22:09 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> I'd assume that a good bridge would see the intended nick and use that, so theoretically yes they'd support nested bridges
22:10 BrBridge <S​oni> no that's bad
22:10 BrBridge <S​oni> it should relay the whole chain
22:11 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> Also, you're quick to call a draft spec you know nothing about half-assed and start complaining about the progress of something which has helped the state of things and is continuing to make progress
22:12 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> I'd rather see IRCv3 fix the basics and make the spec consistent than do what Matrix did and focus on anything but
22:13 BrBridge <S​oni> they keep ignoring real-life use-cases because those don't fit neatly in their model, rather than trying to make space for them
22:14 BrBridge <S​oni> and there's also the whole "let's just keep sending passwords in plaintext to the server so the server can freely log it, and deprecate everything else while at it" issue
22:17 psedlak joined #minetest
22:18 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> What, and what? First, no, that's a generalization (and a poor one at that). Second, sure, but SASL supports other auth mechanisms nowadays too
22:19 BrBridge <S​oni> (paraphrasing your own messages) "the draft spec doesn't contain provisions for relaying the whole relay chain with the message"
22:19 BrBridge <l​uk3yx> There is a channel for IRCv3 discussion, if you had any ideas maybe that'd be the place to send them?
22:20 BrBridge <e​rlehmann> this is bizarre
22:20 BrBridge <e​rlehmann> with the two bridges
22:20 BrBridge <e​rlehmann> <benrob0329> I'd rather see IRCv3 fix the basics and make the spec consistent than do what Matrix did and focus on anything but
22:20 BrBridge <e​rlehmann> lol
22:20 BrBridge <e​rlehmann> matrix is hilarious
22:20 BrBridge <e​rlehmann> matrix has these examples in the spec … that do not match the spec
22:21 BrBridge <S​oni> also: if the "other auth mechanisms" are only EXTERNAL... ugh
22:21 BrBridge <S​oni> (altho TLS-SRP with EXTERNAL wouldn't be half bad. but that's beside the point.)
22:22 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> Send your ideas to #ircv3 then :P
22:24 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> But I don't think it's unreasonable to not directly support bridge-chaining, since bridge-chaining is a bit PITA and it's better to support most use cases sanely than every use case insanely. Anyways, I'mma drop this before the channel is completely flooded with offtopic chit-chat
22:28 BrBridge <S​oni> "just use a stack .-."
22:38 BrBridge <V​anessaE> benrob0329:  "flooded with offtopic chit-chat"  oh, like there's anything else going on in here? :P
22:38 BrBridge <S​oni> anyway sure, if we can get unbanned from IRCv3 we'll propose RFC 7628 support :3
22:39 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> Actually yeah, Oauth for IRC SASL sounds nice
22:41 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> VanessaE: That's a good point, I suppose there isn't any on-topic discussion going on right now
22:42 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> Also unrelated but kinda related, apparently doing a ctl-z followed by running `bg` lets you move a process to the background in bash
22:42 BrBridge <S​oni> yeah ctrl-z is awesome
22:43 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> I knew it was a thing but wasn't sure of the specifics and didn't want to inadvertently kill the bridge
22:45 BrBridge <L​one_Wolf> equivalent of `command & disown` but during runtime?
22:47 BrBridge <V​anessaE> I usually nohup command &
22:48 BrBridge <b​enrob0329> VE: Well yes, but I didn't for testing initially and don't really care about logs in this case
22:56 Peppy joined #minetest
23:06 Peppy joined #minetest
23:30 Hawk777 joined #minetest

| Channels | #minetest index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext