Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:08 |
|
specing_ joined #minetest |
00:15 |
ungali |
is there an active #minetest there? |
00:15 |
MTDiscord |
<entuland> there is |
00:16 |
ungali |
might as well take the jump now |
00:16 |
cheapie |
ungali: There is, yes. |
00:16 |
ungali |
it |
00:17 |
ungali |
s a shame though |
00:17 |
MTDiscord |
<entuland> the cycle of things ? |
00:22 |
|
ungali joined #minetest |
00:22 |
|
ungali joined #minetest |
00:23 |
|
ungali joined #minetest |
00:23 |
|
ungali joined #minetest |
00:33 |
|
sysadmin joined #minetest |
00:38 |
|
kamdard joined #minetest |
00:45 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> shame libera doesnt bridge to matrix (that i know of) |
00:56 |
|
Kimapr joined #minetest |
00:57 |
|
Kimapr2 joined #minetest |
01:09 |
|
pgimeno left #minetest |
01:36 |
|
Hawk777 joined #minetest |
02:28 |
|
Pexin joined #minetest |
02:42 |
|
whosit joined #minetest |
02:51 |
|
Surfer2011 joined #minetest |
02:57 |
|
epoch joined #minetest |
03:02 |
specing |
Would be nice if we also lost the discord bridge in the process |
03:10 |
Kimapr2 |
why? is the discord bridge bad? |
03:11 |
cheapie |
specing: I mean... it doesn't seem to be there yet, so there's still hope :P |
03:11 |
MTDiscord |
<Kimapr> the discord bridge is here |
03:15 |
specing |
Discord is a proprietary chat network, so it would be hilarious if Minetest were to keep bridging to it after migrating to libera chat because freenode became proprietary |
03:17 |
specing |
And, it is also funny that all these projects (Minetest included?) that depend on GitHub, a proprietary closed-source social coding network, are migrating to libera chat |
03:17 |
specing |
My face is red from all the facepalming |
03:20 |
epoch |
where the like button in this IRC thing? |
03:20 |
MTDiscord |
<Warr1024> Apparently freenode became "proprietary" back in 2017 and people just managed to keep it subtle up until lately. |
03:28 |
Quiark |
specing: now consider all those cryptocurrency projects that have big mouths about "decentralisation" and then use Medium, Telegram and/or Discord |
03:31 |
specing |
yes, hypocrisy all around |
03:31 |
specing |
Minetest is not free software |
03:31 |
specing |
Minetest is free software in license only. |
03:31 |
specing |
the spirit is dead |
03:31 |
specing |
if there ever was a spirit, but probably not. |
03:34 |
|
Seirdy joined #minetest |
03:49 |
|
whosit joined #minetest |
03:50 |
Quiark |
I don't blame people for not having time to work for free on something |
04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
04:24 |
MTDiscord |
<Jordach> Quiark: >not mentioniung signal |
04:24 |
Quiark |
No signal never claimed anything about decentralisation |
04:25 |
Quiark |
But a lot of people are projecting that on them as if it was the solution to all problems. |
04:26 |
MTDiscord |
<Jordach> shitpost: use iMessage for minetest communications |
04:27 |
MTDiscord |
<Jordach> call me a madman but the FSF should've foresaw freenode getting rekt years ago |
04:28 |
|
sec^nd joined #minetest |
04:53 |
sofar |
FSF isn't relevant for freenode |
04:54 |
sofar |
and FSF is irrelevant nowadays almost anyway as well |
05:18 |
|
nm0i joined #minetest |
05:25 |
MTDiscord |
<GreenXenith> re: Discord bridge: 99% chance of staying |
05:35 |
MTDiscord |
<Benrob0329> It's funny seeing people any non-Discord platform complain about Discord, and people on Discord complain about literally any other platform. Funny how people forget that it's ok to have different priorities than each other. |
05:35 |
MTDiscord |
<Benrob0329> *people on |
05:42 |
MTDiscord |
<Benrob0329> Personally, I want to move because I like the (previous) Freenode staff and feel that they will have the community's best interests in mind long-term. |
06:00 |
|
Flabb joined #minetest |
06:00 |
|
hlqkj1_ joined #minetest |
06:07 |
|
hlqkj1 joined #minetest |
07:02 |
|
jonasbits joined #minetest |
07:21 |
|
jonasbits joined #minetest |
07:33 |
|
jonasbits joined #minetest |
07:37 |
|
uroboro joined #minetest |
07:46 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
07:57 |
|
Kimapr joined #minetest |
07:59 |
|
jonasbits joined #minetest |
08:00 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #minetest |
08:01 |
|
Kimapr_ joined #minetest |
08:17 |
|
jonasbits joined #minetest |
08:42 |
|
FeXoR joined #minetest |
08:48 |
|
freshreplicant[m left #minetest |
08:51 |
|
hlqkj joined #minetest |
09:14 |
|
SwissalpS joined #minetest |
09:15 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
09:20 |
|
MTDiscord1 joined #minetest |
09:21 |
|
MTDiscord2 joined #minetest |
09:25 |
|
MTDiscord3 joined #minetest |
09:37 |
|
TC01 joined #minetest |
09:38 |
|
MTDiscord4 joined #minetest |
09:40 |
|
MTDiscord5 joined #minetest |
09:42 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
09:42 |
|
justcommenting joined #minetest |
09:43 |
|
Kimapr_ joined #minetest |
09:47 |
|
justcommenting left #minetest |
09:51 |
|
bingfengzs joined #minetest |
09:52 |
|
z812 joined #minetest |
09:53 |
|
z8121 joined #minetest |
09:54 |
|
z812 joined #minetest |
09:54 |
|
z812 joined #minetest |
10:01 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
10:13 |
|
MTDiscord7 joined #minetest |
10:19 |
|
erlehmann joined #minetest |
10:33 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
10:47 |
|
ghoti_ joined #minetest |
10:54 |
|
sysadmin joined #minetest |
11:09 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
11:43 |
|
ghoti_ joined #minetest |
11:47 |
|
hlqkj joined #minetest |
11:51 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
12:05 |
|
ghoti_ joined #minetest |
12:05 |
|
specing_ joined #minetest |
12:16 |
|
ghoti_ joined #minetest |
12:17 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
12:17 |
|
newbie joined #minetest |
12:17 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #minetest |
12:18 |
|
mrkubax10 left #minetest |
12:38 |
|
ghoti joined #minetest |
12:43 |
|
ghoti_ joined #minetest |
12:45 |
|
newbie joined #minetest |
12:52 |
|
ghoti joined #minetest |
12:53 |
|
hlqkj_ joined #minetest |
12:55 |
|
newbie joined #minetest |
12:58 |
|
hlqkj joined #minetest |
13:00 |
|
sec^nd joined #minetest |
13:00 |
|
est31 joined #minetest |
13:00 |
|
Sven_vB joined #minetest |
13:00 |
|
twoelk joined #minetest |
13:02 |
|
ghoti_ joined #minetest |
13:05 |
|
sys4 joined #minetest |
13:12 |
|
ghoti joined #minetest |
13:19 |
|
ghoti_ joined #minetest |
13:29 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
13:29 |
|
kamdard joined #minetest |
13:33 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
13:38 |
|
ghoti joined #minetest |
13:51 |
|
n_to joined #minetest |
13:52 |
|
est31 joined #minetest |
13:53 |
|
hlqkj joined #minetest |
13:54 |
|
ghoti_ joined #minetest |
13:56 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
14:02 |
|
olliy_ joined #minetest |
14:07 |
|
gera joined #minetest |
14:19 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest |
14:37 |
|
Sokomine joined #minetest |
14:45 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
14:47 |
|
Kimapr_ joined #minetest |
15:04 |
|
Kimapr_ joined #minetest |
15:16 |
|
GreenXenith joined #minetest |
15:32 |
|
mransom_ joined #minetest |
15:34 |
|
mransom_ joined #minetest |
15:51 |
|
mransom_ joined #minetest |
16:20 |
|
Soni left #minetest |
16:31 |
* twoelk |
is somehow reminded of the childrensbook hero Noddy |
16:56 |
|
hlqkj1 joined #minetest |
16:59 |
|
Talkless joined #minetest |
17:01 |
|
SwissalpS joined #minetest |
17:04 |
|
twoelk left #minetest |
17:05 |
|
Hawk777 joined #minetest |
17:08 |
|
hlqkj1_ joined #minetest |
17:09 |
|
appguru joined #minetest |
17:13 |
|
Hawk777 joined #minetest |
17:25 |
|
hlqkj joined #minetest |
17:49 |
|
cheapie left #minetest |
17:52 |
|
Fixer_ joined #minetest |
18:20 |
|
absurb joined #minetest |
18:28 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
18:34 |
|
hlqkj_ joined #minetest |
19:13 |
|
sysadmin joined #minetest |
19:20 |
|
I_am_6r1d joined #minetest |
19:22 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest |
19:31 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
19:32 |
|
Flabb joined #minetest |
19:52 |
|
Zander_200 joined #minetest |
19:52 |
Zander_200 |
hi |
20:15 |
|
nm0i left #minetest |
20:46 |
|
hlqkj_ joined #minetest |
21:03 |
|
BrBridge joined #minetest |
21:04 |
|
benrob0329 joined #minetest |
21:05 |
|
BrBridge joined #minetest |
21:05 |
benrob0329 |
test |
21:06 |
BrBridge |
success! |
21:06 |
BrBridge |
failure! |
21:06 |
BrBridge |
well, one of the two |
21:06 |
BrBridge |
No nicks, I'd think that would be a default settings but I suppose not |
21:09 |
|
BrBridge joined #minetest |
21:13 |
|
BrBridge joined #minetest |
21:13 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329>Test |
21:13 |
benrob0329 |
Test2 |
21:13 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329>I forgot the space, but at least it works |
21:17 |
|
BrBridge joined #minetest |
21:19 |
|
BrBridge joined #minetest |
21:20 |
benrob0329 |
Is Libera giving anyone else trouble at the moment? |
21:21 |
rubenwardy |
no? |
21:21 |
benrob0329 |
hmm |
21:21 |
benrob0329 |
Maybe the server near me is just having issues, or it's my network |
21:23 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
21:25 |
|
BrBridge joined #minetest |
21:25 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> test |
21:25 |
benrob0329 |
There we go |
21:27 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> Discord bridge ignores it (as expected, both should send notices) but I can always add the Discord to this bridge is GreenXenith wants it all to be homogeneous |
21:27 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> *if |
21:28 |
rubenwardy |
what is that? |
21:28 |
benrob0329 |
Bridge to Libera, was suggested and approved by C55 |
21:29 |
benrob0329 |
(only approved by, was not suggested by C55) |
21:30 |
benrob0329 |
https://irc.minetest.net/minetest-hub/2021-05-20#i_5821807 |
21:31 |
benrob0329 |
I haven't added -hub yet because I want to make sure this is working properly before tying it to an account and dealing with autovoice |
21:33 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> oh, I thought it was for Discord, so it's bridging to the-other-place-that-shalt-not-be-mentioned? eheheh |
21:34 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> For now, yes. I may add other official spaces to it as well in the near future but for now this is fine |
21:34 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> cool |
21:40 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> benrob0329: The Discord bridge doesnt ignore it, its just not bridged here yet |
21:41 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> It's also down atm, dunno if that's intentional or not |
21:41 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> It is not intentional, no.. |
21:42 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> Will the bridge you have work the same as the current bridge? |
21:43 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> As in send messages to Discord via Webhooks? Yes. |
21:43 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> its an intense of https://github.com/42wim/matterbridge |
21:43 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> Can it send to the 3 channels already? |
21:44 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> I don't have -hub added yet because I don't want to deal with autovoice right this sec, but yes |
21:44 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> I don't have staff anywhere on IRC anymore so I can't do that without someone like VE lending a hand |
21:46 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
21:47 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> a |
21:47 |
GreenXenith |
b |
21:47 |
MTDiscord |
<GreenXenith> c |
21:47 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> Fair enough |
21:47 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> We can adjust it later, I dont have time or energy to work with this right now |
21:48 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> It works and that's all that matters |
21:51 |
MTDiscord |
<entuland> noice |
21:54 |
|
benrob0329 joined #minetest |
21:54 |
|
Elouin joined #minetest |
21:54 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> wow that was quite a delay ahahah |
21:54 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> 2 minutes flat :P |
21:54 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> aaaand we'll get people calling other people BrBridge in addition to MTDiscord :P |
21:54 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> Now what happened |
21:54 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> Is it just me or are both bridges choking |
21:55 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> your messages went through instant to Discord on my end |
21:55 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> Yeah, after a while |
21:55 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> and mine as well just went through immediate now |
21:55 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> I think Libera is choking a bit |
21:55 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> Cant imagine why :) |
21:55 |
MTDiscord |
<entuland> yeah eheheh |
21:55 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> Definitely not because of the sudden rush of new people |
21:55 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> maybe it was just a temp hiccup, now it's quick both ways |
21:56 |
BrBridge |
<GreenXenith> Oh man I only just now noticed the <BrBridge> <MTDiscord> <entuland> this is getting out of hand, now there are 3 of them :D |
21:56 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> :P |
21:56 |
BrBridge |
<VanessaE> [05-20 17:56] <GreenXenith> Oh man I only just now noticed the <BrBridge> <MTDiscord> <entuland> this is getting out of hand, now there are 3 of them :D |
21:56 |
BrBridge |
<VanessaE> now there are 6 ;) |
21:57 |
MTDiscord |
<GreenXenith> yikes x) |
21:57 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> Apparently there's a draft IRCv3 RELAYMSG spec for spoofing nicks, dunno if Libera or Freenode supports it though |
21:57 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> the discord one used to rename itself to match the sender on the other side |
21:57 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> I guess that's not feasible here on IRC |
21:57 |
MTDiscord |
<GreenXenith> It still does |
21:57 |
MTDiscord |
<GreenXenith> You just have to be speaking from Freenode for it to do so atm |
21:58 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> on Discord all the messages are sent as BrBridge on my end |
21:58 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> ah sorry, I missed that bit |
21:58 |
MTDiscord |
<GreenXenith> Because BrBridge is the one bridging from Libera to Freenode |
21:59 |
MTDiscord |
<GreenXenith> so anythingon Libera shows up on Freenode from BrBridge so MTDiscord displays it from BrBridge :] |
21:59 |
MTDiscord |
<GreenXenith> Dont worry its totally not confusing at all |
21:59 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> eheheh |
21:59 |
|
olliy_ joined #minetest |
21:59 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> well, as lont as it doesn't loop it's already great :P |
21:59 |
BrBridge |
<entuland> s/lont/long |
22:00 |
|
Sven_vB joined #minetest |
22:01 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> Could be worse, I could be bridging joins/parts too :P |
22:02 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
22:02 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> there's a CTCP for spoofing nicks |
22:02 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> (please don't use it) |
22:04 |
MTDiscord |
<VanessaE> do like kaeza's hexchat script does for Minetest IRC bots: <botname> <username> blahblahblah gets shortened to usernamebot_abbreviation blahblah |
22:04 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> https://github.com/SoniEx2/CTCP-S/blob/master/ctcp-s.md#forward |
22:04 |
|
rubenwardy left #minetest |
22:04 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> (please don't use it. altho if you do, put it at the end of the message instead of the start.) |
22:04 |
MTDiscord |
<VanessaE> er shortened to <usernamebot_abbreviation> blahblah |
22:05 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> I'm hoping for either the RELAYMSG draft or the Display Name draft to become standard |
22:05 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> client-only tags > CTCP |
22:06 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> benrob0329: CTCP > waiting decades for server-side support |
22:06 |
MTDiscord |
<VanessaE> for example, <KAYLRPVEBL> How are you? is how that person's chat looks coming from my Banananananananaland server |
22:06 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> (also do either of those half-assed specs actually support nested bridges?) |
22:08 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> I mean, IRCv3 has gotten decent support for universally helpful things like SASLv3 and Capability Negotiation |
22:09 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> yeah but it never goes far enough |
22:09 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> there's no IRCv3 server-specific emoji for example |
22:09 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> I'd assume that a good bridge would see the intended nick and use that, so theoretically yes they'd support nested bridges |
22:10 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> no that's bad |
22:10 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> it should relay the whole chain |
22:11 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> Also, you're quick to call a draft spec you know nothing about half-assed and start complaining about the progress of something which has helped the state of things and is continuing to make progress |
22:12 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> I'd rather see IRCv3 fix the basics and make the spec consistent than do what Matrix did and focus on anything but |
22:13 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> they keep ignoring real-life use-cases because those don't fit neatly in their model, rather than trying to make space for them |
22:14 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> and there's also the whole "let's just keep sending passwords in plaintext to the server so the server can freely log it, and deprecate everything else while at it" issue |
22:17 |
|
psedlak joined #minetest |
22:18 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> What, and what? First, no, that's a generalization (and a poor one at that). Second, sure, but SASL supports other auth mechanisms nowadays too |
22:19 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> (paraphrasing your own messages) "the draft spec doesn't contain provisions for relaying the whole relay chain with the message" |
22:19 |
BrBridge |
<luk3yx> There is a channel for IRCv3 discussion, if you had any ideas maybe that'd be the place to send them? |
22:20 |
BrBridge |
<erlehmann> this is bizarre |
22:20 |
BrBridge |
<erlehmann> with the two bridges |
22:20 |
BrBridge |
<erlehmann> <benrob0329> I'd rather see IRCv3 fix the basics and make the spec consistent than do what Matrix did and focus on anything but |
22:20 |
BrBridge |
<erlehmann> lol |
22:20 |
BrBridge |
<erlehmann> matrix is hilarious |
22:20 |
BrBridge |
<erlehmann> matrix has these examples in the spec … that do not match the spec |
22:21 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> also: if the "other auth mechanisms" are only EXTERNAL... ugh |
22:21 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> (altho TLS-SRP with EXTERNAL wouldn't be half bad. but that's beside the point.) |
22:22 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> Send your ideas to #ircv3 then :P |
22:24 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> But I don't think it's unreasonable to not directly support bridge-chaining, since bridge-chaining is a bit PITA and it's better to support most use cases sanely than every use case insanely. Anyways, I'mma drop this before the channel is completely flooded with offtopic chit-chat |
22:28 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> "just use a stack .-." |
22:38 |
BrBridge |
<VanessaE> benrob0329: "flooded with offtopic chit-chat" oh, like there's anything else going on in here? :P |
22:38 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> anyway sure, if we can get unbanned from IRCv3 we'll propose RFC 7628 support :3 |
22:39 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> Actually yeah, Oauth for IRC SASL sounds nice |
22:41 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> VanessaE: That's a good point, I suppose there isn't any on-topic discussion going on right now |
22:42 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> Also unrelated but kinda related, apparently doing a ctl-z followed by running `bg` lets you move a process to the background in bash |
22:42 |
BrBridge |
<Soni> yeah ctrl-z is awesome |
22:43 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> I knew it was a thing but wasn't sure of the specifics and didn't want to inadvertently kill the bridge |
22:45 |
BrBridge |
<Lone_Wolf> equivalent of `command & disown` but during runtime? |
22:47 |
BrBridge |
<VanessaE> I usually nohup command & |
22:48 |
BrBridge |
<benrob0329> VE: Well yes, but I didn't for testing initially and don't really care about logs in this case |
22:56 |
|
Peppy joined #minetest |
23:06 |
|
Peppy joined #minetest |
23:30 |
|
Hawk777 joined #minetest |