Time |
Nick |
Message |
01:08 |
|
Thomas-S joined #minetest-hub |
03:58 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-hub |
04:21 |
benrob0329 |
bigfoot547: you need a better terminal emulator :P |
06:21 |
|
lumidify joined #minetest-hub |
07:14 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-hub |
07:37 |
|
xerox123 joined #minetest-hub |
07:59 |
jas_ |
i'm WeeChat with Noto Moto in GNOME Terminal and the hamburger renders fine. |
08:00 |
jas_ |
expect i didn't see the cheese until going to glowing bear. it's black and white, the emoticon. |
08:01 |
jas_ |
wow, there's tomato and lettuce too |
08:10 |
jas_ |
https://imgur.com/a/o8092 |
08:53 |
|
Natechip joined #minetest-hub |
09:17 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-hub |
09:30 |
jas_ |
anyone else having long delay on crafting? particularly with middle-clicking 10 at a time. i suspect it's the rebind mouse keys PR i keep rebasing. samc said it was because a key wasn't being released, and it seems to happen with placement as well. safe_dig_and_place = true doesn't seem to affect this. |
10:19 |
celeron55 |
< Fixer> oooommmmmgggg, how i missed world aligned textures merging? <- wanted to look this up and finding it was weirdly difficult, it's like github's PR search doesn't even work |
10:20 |
celeron55 |
(so, it's this one https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6105) |
10:20 |
Raven262 |
So this is now in 0.5? |
10:21 |
celeron55 |
was merged 18 days ago |
10:46 |
|
Raven262 joined #minetest-hub |
10:59 |
|
Raven262 joined #minetest-hub |
11:25 |
jas_ |
related: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6536 |
11:58 |
|
CalebDavis joined #minetest-hub |
12:12 |
|
NathanS21 joined #minetest-hub |
12:53 |
|
RobbieF joined #minetest-hub |
13:09 |
|
Jordach joined #minetest-hub |
13:20 |
|
sniper338 joined #minetest-hub |
13:28 |
rubenwardy |
what's the opinion of https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/pull/1928 ? |
13:29 |
rubenwardy |
it removes capes, but fixes stretching and MC skin editors |
13:29 |
rubenwardy |
(from the PR description) |
13:40 |
jas_ |
i got capes in clothing mod, so i'm happy. |
13:43 |
jas_ |
(no socks, though.) |
15:51 |
|
CWz joined #minetest-hub |
16:15 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-hub |
16:20 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-hub |
16:23 |
Krock |
Seems legit https://i.imgur.com/z0vHhrR.png |
16:41 |
benrob0329 |
Krock: very legit |
16:46 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-hub |
16:47 |
|
bwarden joined #minetest-hub |
17:03 |
|
bwarden joined #minetest-hub |
17:34 |
Jordach |
for(int i = 0; i < 1; i + 1) |
17:35 |
|
bwarden joined #minetest-hub |
17:39 |
|
Darcidride_ joined #minetest-hub |
17:49 |
|
bwarden joined #minetest-hub |
17:54 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-hub |
17:54 |
Krock |
Jordach, nice infinite loop |
18:00 |
|
bwarden joined #minetest-hub |
18:18 |
|
Grandolf joined #minetest-hub |
18:30 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-hub |
18:41 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-hub |
19:07 |
|
bwarden joined #minetest-hub |
19:13 |
|
twoelk joined #minetest-hub |
19:23 |
|
bwarden joined #minetest-hub |
19:39 |
|
xerox123 joined #minetest-hub |
19:46 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest-hub |
19:51 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-hub |
19:57 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-hub |
20:10 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-hub |
20:12 |
|
RobbieF left #minetest-hub |
20:15 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-hub |
20:22 |
benrob0329 |
Jordach: that loop will never increment, in fact it probably won't compile |
20:23 |
rubenwardy |
benrob0329, it would compile actually |
20:23 |
rubenwardy |
i + 3 is a valid C++ statement |
20:23 |
rubenwardy |
just not a useful one |
20:23 |
benrob0329 |
i + 1 is not a complete statement though |
20:23 |
rubenwardy |
iirc |
20:24 |
benrob0329 |
i = i + 1, or i += 1 would be complete |
20:24 |
rubenwardy |
just checked |
20:24 |
rubenwardy |
it does compile |
20:24 |
benrob0329 |
Dangit |
20:24 |
rubenwardy |
expressions are valid statements |
20:25 |
Jordach |
:^) |
20:25 |
Jordach |
git gud |
20:25 |
benrob0329 |
I feel like it shouldnt compile, but I suppose it does |
20:25 |
rubenwardy |
it probably shouldn't compile, yeah |
20:26 |
rubenwardy |
C(++) isn't known for being safe though |
20:26 |
benrob0329 |
rubenwardy: this is true, but our compilers dont have to be completely stupid |
20:27 |
nore |
^ since assignments are expressions, it would be complicated to do not allow expressions as statements |
20:28 |
benrob0329 |
don't allow statements that return to nothing? |
20:39 |
nerzhul |
if you want safety, use functional language like haskell |
20:48 |
benrob0329 |
nerzhul: \>Haskell |
20:48 |
nore |
benrob0329: the other thing is, a lot of functions like scanf or printf (I think?) have a return value to indicate whether they succeeded |
20:48 |
benrob0329 |
Nice meme |
20:48 |
nore |
most of the time you want to ignore it |
20:48 |
benrob0329 |
nore: they do |
20:49 |
benrob0329 |
I suppose it wouldn't be easy, but you could make a safer C compiler |
20:49 |
benrob0329 |
Not that anyone cares too, the latest fad is breaking compatibility |
20:49 |
nore |
note that gcc creates a warning |
20:49 |
nore |
at least if you enable them |
20:52 |
nerzhul |
benrob0329, clang has many more extensions than gcc to make code safer, but having both compilers with -Wall options enabled if useful to have a complete test set |
21:34 |
|
Grandolf_ joined #minetest-hub |
21:39 |
|
Grandolf joined #minetest-hub |
21:45 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-hub |
22:03 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-hub |
22:04 |
|
atorian37 joined #minetest-hub |