Time  Nick       Message
04:09 bigfoot547 I can see the beautiful in everything now :O
04:09 bigfoot547 I just installed a unicode fint
04:09 bigfoot547 font*
04:09 bigfoot547 Just WeeChat renders things wierdly
04:10 bigfoot547 so my emogi-viewing ways are hampered :/
04:21 benrob0329 bigfoot547: you need a better terminal emulator :P
04:24 bigfoot547 heyyyyyyyy
04:25 bigfoot547 It's WeeChat's fault, lxterminal renders the cheeseburger fine (🍔)
07:59 jas_       i'm WeeChat with Noto Moto in GNOME Terminal and the hamburger renders fine.
08:00 jas_       expect i didn't see the cheese until going to glowing bear.  it's black and white, the emoticon.
08:01 jas_       wow, there's tomato and lettuce too
08:10 jas_       https://imgur.com/a/o8092
09:30 jas_       anyone else having long delay on crafting?  particularly with middle-clicking 10 at a time.  i suspect it's the rebind mouse keys PR i keep rebasing.  samc said it was because a key wasn't being released, and it seems to happen with placement as well.  safe_dig_and_place = true doesn't seem to affect this.
10:19 celeron55  < Fixer> oooommmmmgggg, how i missed world aligned textures merging? <- wanted to look this up and finding it was weirdly difficult, it's like github's PR search doesn't even work
10:20 celeron55  (so, it's this one https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6105)
10:20 Raven262   So this is now in 0.5?
10:21 celeron55  was merged 18 days ago
11:25 jas_       related: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6536
13:28 rubenwardy what's the opinion of https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/pull/1928  ?
13:29 rubenwardy it removes capes, but fixes stretching and MC skin editors
13:29 rubenwardy (from the PR description)
13:40 jas_       i got capes in clothing mod, so i'm happy.
13:43 jas_       (no socks, though.)
16:23 Krock      Seems legit https://i.imgur.com/z0vHhrR.png
16:41 benrob0329 Krock: very legit
17:34 Jordach    for(int i = 0; i < 1; i + 1)
17:54 Krock      Jordach, nice infinite loop
19:38 bigfoot547 :O
20:22 benrob0329 Jordach: that loop will never increment, in fact it probably won't compile
20:23 rubenwardy benrob0329, it would compile actually
20:23 rubenwardy i + 3    is a valid C++ statement
20:23 rubenwardy just not a useful one
20:23 benrob0329 i + 1 is not a complete statement though
20:23 rubenwardy iirc
20:24 benrob0329 i = i + 1, or i += 1 would be complete
20:24 rubenwardy just checked
20:24 rubenwardy it does compile
20:24 benrob0329 Dangit
20:24 rubenwardy expressions are valid statements
20:25 Jordach    :^)
20:25 Jordach    git gud
20:25 benrob0329 I feel like it shouldnt compile, but I suppose it does
20:25 rubenwardy it probably shouldn't compile, yeah
20:26 rubenwardy C(++) isn't known for being safe though
20:26 benrob0329 rubenwardy: this is true, but our compilers dont have to be completely stupid
20:27 nore       ^ since assignments are expressions, it would be complicated to do not allow expressions as statements
20:28 benrob0329 don't allow statements that return to nothing?
20:39 nerzhul    if you want safety, use functional language like haskell
20:48 benrob0329 nerzhul: \>Haskell
20:48 nore       benrob0329: the other thing is, a lot of functions like scanf or printf (I think?) have a return value to indicate whether they succeeded
20:48 benrob0329 Nice meme
20:48 nore       most of the time you want to ignore it
20:48 benrob0329 nore: they do
20:49 benrob0329 I suppose it wouldn't be easy, but you could make a safer C compiler
20:49 benrob0329 Not that anyone cares too, the latest fad is breaking compatibility
20:49 nore       note that gcc creates a warning
20:49 nore       at least if you enable them
20:52 nerzhul    benrob0329, clang has many more extensions than gcc to make code safer, but having both compilers with -Wall options enabled if useful to have a complete test set