| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:31 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:10 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:12 |
lhofhansl |
I have had MT setup with a MAP_BLOCKSIZE of 32 now, and I do not see any detriments. Even when I measure the time for mapgen, etc, it is, within a few percent, the same. And FPS on the client is much better. And since we have the separate mesh generator thread on the client I even have not observed any major stutters. |
| 03:13 |
lhofhansl |
Why do we think that lower MAP_BLOCKSIZE is better for low-end machines? The aggregate work in the same, right, just the unit of generation, exchange, and rendering is different. |
| 05:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:00 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:00 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:28 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:33 |
Krock |
@Lone_Wolf : I cannot reproduce #10675 using your code. Which actions are performed twice? I don't use either mod, thus it's kinda difficult to figure out what exactly doesn't work as expected |
| 09:33 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10675 -- #7924 causes unwanted rightclicking in certain situations |
| 09:34 |
Krock |
!tell lhofhansl How about sequential mapblock updates? What if there's a mesecon circuit that updates the mapblock data each second? There's also a problem with the inventory serialization which is very slow for large itemstacks (with metadata) |
| 09:34 |
ShadowBot |
Krock: O.K. |
| 10:08 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:44 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:09 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:17 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:48 |
|
Ritchie joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:12 |
|
jonadab joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:03 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:27 |
Krock |
#10661 is now ready for review |
| 16:27 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10661 -- [MANUAL SQUASH] Settings: Proper priority hierarchy by SmallJoker |
| 16:33 |
Krock |
will merge trivial game#2785 in 10 minutes |
| 16:33 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2785 -- Fix minor bug in german translation. Fixes #2784 by randomMesh |
| 16:42 |
Krock |
merging.... |
| 16:48 |
Krock |
Q: should FontEngine continue to use m_settings, or shall I replace everything with g_settings? It's currently the same anyway |
| 16:49 |
sfan5 |
i dont see a reason fontengine needs its own settings |
| 16:49 |
Krock |
maybe the idea was to contruct a new object when joining a game, so that game settings can be applied |
| 16:49 |
Krock |
but that's only an assumption |
| 16:57 |
Krock |
now the total line difference is +1. amazing. |
| 16:57 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:05 |
MTDiscord |
<Lone_Wolf> @Krock 'fixed' https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10675#issuecomment-735424737 |
| 17:05 |
MTDiscord |
<Lone_Wolf> You should now see a 'REMOVED' chat message every time you spawn the entity |
| 17:19 |
Krock |
trying |
| 17:21 |
Krock |
on_secondary_use and on_rightclick is called at the same time |
| 17:21 |
Krock |
I see |
| 17:37 |
Krock |
also happens with key presses |
| 17:39 |
Krock |
probably due to the reset functions at the end |
| 17:44 |
Krock |
the key event outlasts multiple frames until it's marked as handled |
| 17:52 |
Krock |
hhaha. fixing that causes the same problem when rightclicking the entitiy |
| 17:52 |
Krock |
same but reversed |
| 18:01 |
Krock |
but it works properly in other situations |
| 18:01 |
Krock |
like changing fast move |
| 18:16 |
Krock |
actually that seems to be expected |
| 18:17 |
Krock |
if (m_script->item_OnSecondaryUse( .... pointed_object->rightClick(playersao); |
| 18:21 |
Krock |
@Lone_Wolf: Does this fix your issue ? https://krock-works.uk.to/u/patches/0001-Input-Fix-on_rightclick-called-when-placing-into-air.patch |
| 18:21 |
Krock |
another option would be to replace wasKeyPressed a few lines above with wasKeyDown, which marks the key as handled |
| 18:27 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> @Lone_Wolf ☝️ |
| 18:30 |
|
calcul0n_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:41 |
|
homthack joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:59 |
|
homthack joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:13 |
|
lisac joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:27 |
|
Tmanyo joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:53 |
|
numzero joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:14 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:02 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:16 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
