| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:51 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:17 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:23 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:50 |
|
m42uko joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:04 |
|
olliy joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:45 |
|
olliy joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:00 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:19 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:27 |
|
Kray joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:42 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:46 |
|
lisac joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:22 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:31 |
|
NetherEran joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:52 |
sfan5 |
https://old.reddit.com/r/Minetest/comments/jmz9fe/cant_get_any_game_besides_tutorial_to_work_i/ |
| 09:52 |
sfan5 |
games should really be disallowed from setting mg_name |
| 09:55 |
rubenwardy |
I think that minetest.settings should be changed to set world settings rather than global |
| 09:55 |
rubenwardy |
With world settings made a thing |
| 09:58 |
nore |
I thought games setting mg_name was to force singlenode mapgen for those who have their own mapgen? |
| 10:04 |
sfan5 |
it was |
| 10:04 |
sfan5 |
but the setting persists and games now have the ability to influence the mapgens selectable in the world creation menu |
| 10:08 |
rubenwardy |
There's also a different API for that |
| 10:15 |
|
amk joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:21 |
|
pyrollo joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:36 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:03 |
|
pyrollo joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:04 |
|
NetherEran joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:30 |
|
pyrollo joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:16 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:46 |
zughy[m] |
> strictly spoken the lua_api.txt would now need an update to properly state optional arguments, though |
| 14:46 |
zughy[m] |
Krock things that were optional before should be optional still, I don't think I should edit anything ? |
| 14:46 |
zughy[m] |
* > |
| 14:46 |
zughy[m] |
strictly spoken the lua_api.txt would now need an update to properly state optional arguments, though |
| 14:46 |
zughy[m] |
Krock things that were optional before should be optional still, I don't think I should edit anything ? |
| 14:47 |
zughy[m] |
I mean, after 10564 is approved, I'll take care of your reviews in the old one and things should be the same |
| 14:55 |
|
_Zaizen_[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:55 |
|
kb1000 joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:31 |
|
Kimapr[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:31 |
|
zughy[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:34 |
|
kb1000 joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:37 |
|
giov4[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:37 |
|
anon5[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:37 |
|
Benrob0329[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:37 |
|
rubenwardy[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:40 |
|
celeron55[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:43 |
|
_Zaizen_[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:00 |
|
nathanfranke[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
celeron55[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
_Zaizen_[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
zughy[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
anon5[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
Qiangong2[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
kb1000 joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
rubenwardy[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
Kimapr[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
Benrob0329[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
giov4[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:52 |
|
Kray joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:13 |
|
fluxflux joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:54 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:07 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:38 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:41 |
lhofhansl |
Planning to merge #10597 soon. |
| 23:41 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10597 -- Increase defaults for viewing_range, active_object_range and related settings by lhofhansl |
| 23:43 |
lhofhansl |
Also, if someone can let me know how to generate minetest.conf.example. Pardon my ignorance on that. |
| 23:45 |
rubenwardy |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/builtin/mainmenu/dlg_settings_advanced.lua#L1101-L1106 |
| 23:49 |
lhofhansl |
Ah. Thanks. Kinda non-obvious :) |
| 23:52 |
lhofhansl |
Anybody who can take a quick look at #10595? |
| 23:52 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10595 -- Slight simplification and optimization of RemoteClient. by lhofhansl |
| 23:56 |
sfan5 |
the only complaint I have is that // Check whether the block exists (with data). shouldn't end with a period |
| 23:56 |
sfan5 |
LGTM otherwise |
| 23:58 |
lhofhansl |
I'll update the comment. |
| 23:59 |
lhofhansl |
BTW. The reason why the server (especially with large settings for max_block_send_distance) spends much time in isOccluded is that the occluded blocks are not sent to the client. So each time RemoteClient::getNextBlocks is called the server has to recheck these blocks. |
