Time  Nick       Message
09:52 sfan5      https://old.reddit.com/r/Minetest/comments/jmz9fe/cant_get_any_game_besides_tutorial_to_work_i/
09:52 sfan5      games should really be disallowed from setting mg_name
09:55 rubenwardy I think that minetest.settings should be changed to set world settings rather than global
09:55 rubenwardy With world settings made a thing
09:58 nore       I thought games setting mg_name was to force singlenode mapgen for those who have their own mapgen?
10:04 sfan5      it was
10:04 sfan5      but the setting persists and games now have the ability to influence the mapgens selectable in the world creation menu
10:08 rubenwardy There's also a different API for that
14:46 zughy[m]   > strictly spoken the lua_api.txt would now need an update to properly state optional arguments, though
14:46 zughy[m]   Krock  things that were optional before should be optional still, I don't think I should edit anything ?
14:46 zughy[m]   * >
14:46 zughy[m]   strictly spoken the lua_api.txt would now need an update to properly state optional arguments, though
14:46 zughy[m]   Krock  things that were optional before should be optional still, I don't think I should edit anything ?
14:47 zughy[m]   I mean, after 10564 is approved, I'll take care of your reviews in the old one and things should be the same
23:41 lhofhansl  Planning to merge #10597 soon.
23:41 ShadowBot  https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10597 -- Increase defaults for viewing_range, active_object_range and related settings by lhofhansl
23:43 lhofhansl  Also, if someone can let me know how to generate minetest.conf.example. Pardon my ignorance on that.
23:45 rubenwardy https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/builtin/mainmenu/dlg_settings_advanced.lua#L1101-L1106
23:49 lhofhansl  Ah. Thanks. Kinda non-obvious :)
23:52 lhofhansl  Anybody who can take a quick look at #10595?
23:52 ShadowBot  https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10595 -- Slight simplification and optimization of RemoteClient. by lhofhansl
23:56 sfan5      the only complaint I have is that // Check whether the block exists (with data). shouldn't end with a period
23:56 sfan5      LGTM otherwise
23:58 lhofhansl  I'll update the comment.
23:59 lhofhansl  BTW. The reason why the server (especially with large settings for max_block_send_distance) spends much time in isOccluded is that the occluded blocks are not sent to the client. So each time RemoteClient::getNextBlocks is called the server has to recheck these blocks.