Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:13 |
paramat |
nice |
01:45 |
|
VargaD joined #minetest-dev |
01:58 |
|
Foz joined #minetest-dev |
02:01 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
03:46 |
|
popey joined #minetest-dev |
03:46 |
|
dmurph joined #minetest-dev |
05:11 |
|
DI3HARD139 joined #minetest-dev |
05:24 |
|
davisonio joined #minetest-dev |
05:32 |
|
larrythecow joined #minetest-dev |
05:32 |
|
`z joined #minetest-dev |
05:32 |
larrythecow |
is it possible to change a node's formspec inside on_receive_fields? |
05:33 |
larrythecow |
ie, have a button change the formspec |
05:35 |
|
popey joined #minetest-dev |
05:40 |
Cornelia |
I think you can issue some commands to display a new formspsc if needed. |
05:40 |
Cornelia |
And if you're programmatically generating your formspsc it could update that way. |
05:43 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
05:44 |
larrythecow |
i'm just using meta:set_string("formspec", my_formspec) |
05:45 |
larrythecow |
the same code works in on_construct and in an abm |
05:45 |
larrythecow |
just not in on_receive_fields |
05:45 |
larrythecow |
i'm not sure if this is a bug or if it's the known and expected behavior |
05:46 |
larrythecow |
i also tried using minetest.after() inside on_receive_fields, but that didn't seem to work either |
05:47 |
ANAND |
larrythecow: this channel is for core development only. Modding and Lua API related questions can be asked on #minetest |
05:49 |
larrythecow |
ANAND: duly noted. |
05:50 |
|
popey joined #minetest-dev |
05:50 |
ANAND |
:) |
06:10 |
|
popey joined #minetest-dev |
06:16 |
|
ensonic joined #minetest-dev |
06:21 |
|
popey joined #minetest-dev |
06:21 |
|
dmurph joined #minetest-dev |
06:21 |
|
__vy joined #minetest-dev |
06:22 |
|
__vy joined #minetest-dev |
06:22 |
|
`z joined #minetest-dev |
06:24 |
|
`z joined #minetest-dev |
06:27 |
|
`z joined #minetest-dev |
06:31 |
|
clavi joined #minetest-dev |
06:31 |
|
davisonio joined #minetest-dev |
08:04 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
09:13 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
10:20 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
10:24 |
ANAND |
Super-trivial PR: #7466 |
10:24 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7466 -- Fix incorrect directive in lua_api.txt by ClobberXD |
10:25 |
ANAND |
Could also be implemented via another open PR focusing on the Lua API documentation. |
10:47 |
davisonio |
when will 0.4.17.1 be in the PPA? |
11:49 |
|
rubenwardy joined #minetest-dev |
11:50 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
11:51 |
paramat |
#7465 updated. will merge #7466 in 15mins |
11:51 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7465 -- README.md: Improve version scheme text by paramat |
11:51 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7466 -- Fix incorrect directive in lua_api.txt by ClobberXD |
12:02 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
12:04 |
paramat |
merging 7466 |
12:06 |
paramat |
done |
12:08 |
ANAND |
Thank you :) |
12:10 |
paramat |
merging 7465 |
12:11 |
paramat |
done |
12:17 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
13:32 |
|
antims joined #minetest-dev |
14:03 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
14:59 |
|
cx384 joined #minetest-dev |
15:07 |
ManElevation_ |
about ipv6 that i was saying before how do i put this on the config? cause its says its wrong |
15:07 |
ManElevation_ |
If you want to announce your ipv6 address, use serverlist_url = v6.servers.minetest.net. |
15:07 |
ManElevation_ |
serverlist_url = v6.servers.minetest.net. |
15:11 |
red-001 |
** server can't find v6.servers.minetest.net: NXDOMAIN |
15:11 |
rubenwardy |
literally just do enable_ipv6 = true |
15:11 |
rubenwardy |
don't change serverlist_url |
15:11 |
|
Beton joined #minetest-dev |
15:11 |
rubenwardy |
make sure you allow ipv6 to the port |
15:12 |
sfan5 |
rubenwardy: enable_ipv6 is the default |
15:12 |
sfan5 |
what you're looking for is ipv6_server = true |
15:12 |
rubenwardy |
ah right |
15:17 |
sfan5 |
ManElevation_: is it still not working? |
16:38 |
|
Darcidride_ joined #minetest-dev |
17:18 |
red-001 |
nerzhul, do you plan to add a Lua interface to the new chat message protocol? |
17:18 |
red-001 |
protocol/packet |
17:34 |
nerzhul |
red-001 hello ! nice to see you |
17:34 |
nerzhul |
red-001 in CSM part or SSM part ? |
17:34 |
Krock |
why not both? |
17:34 |
nerzhul |
it's a question, both are possible |
17:34 |
nerzhul |
you mean with the message type attribute ? |
17:35 |
nerzhul |
someone can add it if needed on the SSM part and use the new correct call |
17:35 |
nerzhul |
for client it's already the case, no ? |
17:37 |
red-001 |
message type and timestamp |
17:37 |
Krock |
I don't think so. I'm still relying on string.match in Lua to check whether the message could be sent by the server or whether it's a chat message |
17:38 |
red-001 |
yeah last I checked CSM still used the old system |
17:38 |
nerzhul |
feel free to update, i'm busy on side projects these days, i miss some time to do it :) |
17:49 |
nerzhul |
i have some work on other parts, like android then i'm not free for a such feature, red-001 and Krock go |
17:49 |
nerzhul |
i can review only |
17:54 |
|
Gael-de-Sailly joined #minetest-dev |
18:08 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
18:13 |
|
Player-2 joined #minetest-dev |
18:29 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
18:39 |
|
rubenwardy joined #minetest-dev |
18:48 |
paramat |
hate to mention it but, this needs doing before 5.0.0 release #6925 |
18:48 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6925 -- Secure builtin CSM code against modification |
18:54 |
|
ensonic joined #minetest-dev |
19:00 |
|
Raven262 joined #minetest-dev |
19:02 |
Krock |
paramat, not just that but also the reported crashes plus the android port need fixing |
19:13 |
paramat |
yes :) |
19:15 |
paramat |
i'm looking through 5.0.0 milestones. i think we should start focussing on what needs doing for 5.0.0 |
19:16 |
paramat |
0.4.16 feels like ancient history now :) |
19:22 |
paramat |
#7456 |
19:22 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7456 -- Decoration API: Add lightweight ability to have complete coverage by paramat |
19:23 |
Krock |
why not "-1"? |
19:23 |
Krock |
10 sounds like yet another random magic number |
19:39 |
|
rubenwardy joined #minetest-dev |
19:51 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
19:54 |
paramat |
oh actually 10 is carefully chosen as explained |
19:55 |
paramat |
it's the value which currently (in master) causes very-near complete coverage |
19:57 |
Krock |
ah I see. Working on #7467 rn |
19:57 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7467 -- Rename CSM_FLAVOUR_LIMITS |
20:39 |
Krock |
#7468 |
20:39 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7468 -- [Don't squash me!] Rename CSM flavours to CSM restrictions by SmallJoker |
20:56 |
rubenwardy |
#7469 |
20:56 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7469 -- Formspecs: Add tooltip element for area by rubenwardy |
21:02 |
|
lumberJ joined #minetest-dev |
21:19 |
|
lumberJ joined #minetest-dev |
21:25 |
|
ManElevation_ joined #minetest-dev |
21:33 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
22:38 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-dev |
22:39 |
|
Gael-de-Sailly joined #minetest-dev |
22:55 |
|
Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev |
22:57 |
|
Foz joined #minetest-dev |
22:58 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
23:21 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
23:33 |
|
turtleman joined #minetest-dev |
23:39 |
|
turtleman_ joined #minetest-dev |
23:43 |
|
turtleman joined #minetest-dev |
23:43 |
|
turtleman joined #minetest-dev |