Time  Nick          Message
00:13 paramat       nice
05:32 larrythecow   is it possible to change a node's formspec inside on_receive_fields?
05:33 larrythecow   ie, have a button change the formspec
05:40 Cornelia      I think you can issue some commands to display a new formspsc if needed.
05:40 Cornelia      And if you're programmatically generating your formspsc it could update that way.
05:44 larrythecow   i'm just using meta:set_string("formspec", my_formspec)
05:45 larrythecow   the same code works in on_construct and in an abm
05:45 larrythecow   just not in on_receive_fields
05:45 larrythecow   i'm not sure if this is a bug or if it's the known and expected behavior
05:46 larrythecow   i also tried using minetest.after() inside on_receive_fields, but that didn't seem to work either
05:47 ANAND         larrythecow: this channel is for core development only. Modding and Lua API related questions can be asked on #minetest
05:49 larrythecow   ANAND: duly noted.
05:50 ANAND         :)
10:24 ANAND         Super-trivial PR: #7466
10:24 ShadowBot     https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7466 -- Fix incorrect directive in lua_api.txt by ClobberXD
10:25 ANAND         Could also be implemented via another open PR focusing on the Lua API documentation.
10:47 davisonio     when will 0.4.17.1 be in the PPA?
11:51 paramat       #7465 updated. will merge #7466 in 15mins
11:51 ShadowBot     https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7465 -- README.md: Improve version scheme text by paramat
11:51 ShadowBot     https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7466 -- Fix incorrect directive in lua_api.txt by ClobberXD
12:04 paramat       merging 7466
12:06 paramat       done
12:08 ANAND         Thank you :)
12:10 paramat       merging 7465
12:11 paramat       done
15:07 ManElevation_ about ipv6 that i was saying before how do i put this on the config? cause its says its wrong
15:07 ManElevation_ If you want to announce your ipv6 address, use  serverlist_url = v6.servers.minetest.net.
15:07 ManElevation_ serverlist_url = v6.servers.minetest.net.
15:11 red-001       ** server can't find v6.servers.minetest.net: NXDOMAIN
15:11 rubenwardy    literally just do enable_ipv6 = true
15:11 rubenwardy    don't change serverlist_url
15:11 rubenwardy    make sure you allow ipv6 to the port
15:12 sfan5         rubenwardy: enable_ipv6 is the default
15:12 sfan5         what you're looking for is ipv6_server = true
15:12 rubenwardy    ah right
15:17 sfan5         ManElevation_: is it still not working?
17:18 red-001       nerzhul, do you plan to add a Lua interface to the new chat message protocol?
17:18 red-001       protocol/packet
17:34 nerzhul       red-001 hello ! nice to see you
17:34 nerzhul       red-001 in CSM part or SSM part ?
17:34 Krock         why not both?
17:34 nerzhul       it's a question, both are possible
17:34 nerzhul       you mean with the message type attribute ?
17:35 nerzhul       someone can add it if needed on the SSM part and use the new correct call
17:35 nerzhul       for client it's already the case, no ?
17:37 red-001       message type and timestamp
17:37 Krock         I don't think so. I'm still relying on string.match in Lua to check whether the message could be sent by the server or whether it's a chat message
17:38 red-001       yeah last I checked CSM still used the old system
17:38 nerzhul       feel free to update, i'm busy on side projects these days, i miss some time to do it :)
17:49 nerzhul       i have some work on other parts, like android then i'm not free for a such feature, red-001 and Krock go
17:49 nerzhul       i can review only
18:48 paramat       hate to mention it but, this needs doing before 5.0.0 release #6925
18:48 ShadowBot     https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6925 -- Secure builtin CSM code against modification
19:02 Krock         paramat, not just that but also the reported crashes plus the android port need fixing
19:13 paramat       yes :)
19:15 paramat       i'm looking through 5.0.0 milestones. i think we should start focussing on what needs doing for 5.0.0
19:16 paramat       0.4.16 feels like ancient history now :)
19:22 paramat       #7456
19:22 ShadowBot     https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7456 -- Decoration API: Add lightweight ability to have complete coverage by paramat
19:23 Krock         why not "-1"?
19:23 Krock         10 sounds like yet another random magic number
19:54 paramat       oh actually 10 is carefully chosen as explained
19:55 paramat       it's the value which currently (in master) causes very-near complete coverage
19:57 Krock         ah I see. Working on #7467 rn
19:57 ShadowBot     https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7467 -- Rename CSM_FLAVOUR_LIMITS
20:39 Krock         #7468
20:39 ShadowBot     https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7468 -- [Don't squash me!] Rename CSM flavours to CSM restrictions by SmallJoker
20:56 rubenwardy    #7469
20:56 ShadowBot     https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7469 -- Formspecs: Add tooltip element for area by rubenwardy