Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:02 |
rubenwardy |
It may be worth discussing cleaning up player related flags |
00:03 |
rubenwardy |
we currently have HUD flags, player object properties, and privileges |
00:05 |
paramat |
oh crumbs, it needs a lot of justification though |
00:05 |
paramat |
it works ok so why? |
00:06 |
rubenwardy |
it may be worth making HUD flags just flags |
00:07 |
rubenwardy |
means you can reuse the sending code |
00:08 |
paramat |
ok, no harm discussing |
00:09 |
rubenwardy |
it's best to do this before 0.5, to not break zoom and minimap too much |
00:10 |
paramat |
yes, consider now is best, but it needs a reason |
00:11 |
rubenwardy |
makes it easier to add flag like properties in the future |
00:12 |
rubenwardy |
should reduce code |
00:13 |
|
Fritigern joined #minetest-dev |
00:51 |
|
Tmanyo joined #minetest-dev |
01:50 |
|
ThomasMonroe joined #minetest-dev |
01:53 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
01:54 |
paramat |
will merge game#1911 in a moment |
01:54 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/1911 -- Map mod: Remove confusing 'use', reduce update interval by paramat |
02:05 |
paramat |
done |
02:51 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
04:34 |
|
jordan4ibanez joined #minetest-dev |
05:15 |
|
Hunterz joined #minetest-dev |
05:43 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-dev |
06:15 |
Hijiri |
#5612 just needs one more approval |
06:15 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/5612 -- Allow overriding tool capabilities through itemstack metadata by raymoo |
07:37 |
|
AntumDeluge joined #minetest-dev |
07:40 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
07:47 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-dev |
07:48 |
|
AntumDeluge joined #minetest-dev |
08:02 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-dev |
08:47 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-dev |
08:49 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
09:03 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
09:31 |
|
ThomasMonroe joined #minetest-dev |
09:35 |
|
ThomasMonroe joined #minetest-dev |
09:59 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
10:01 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
10:22 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
10:32 |
|
CalebDavis joined #minetest-dev |
11:25 |
|
Gundul joined #minetest-dev |
11:31 |
|
lisac joined #minetest-dev |
11:46 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
11:51 |
|
ThomasMonroe joined #minetest-dev |
12:36 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
12:59 |
|
Raven262 joined #minetest-dev |
13:28 |
|
antims joined #minetest-dev |
13:40 |
|
Raven262 joined #minetest-dev |
14:22 |
|
ThomasMonroe joined #minetest-dev |
14:33 |
|
srifqi joined #minetest-dev |
14:55 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
15:08 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
15:16 |
|
Hunterz joined #minetest-dev |
15:23 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
15:33 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
16:04 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
16:12 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
16:55 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
17:10 |
|
t7 joined #minetest-dev |
17:11 |
|
t7_ joined #minetest-dev |
17:14 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
17:14 |
|
cx384 joined #minetest-dev |
17:19 |
|
DTA7 joined #minetest-dev |
17:21 |
DTA7 |
Is it ok to make a setting variable thread_local? |
17:21 |
DTA7 |
Like in https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/4e19791cde6b203ad853905d8c1481c43004a7ea/src/mapblock_mesh.cpp#L259-L260 |
17:22 |
sfan5 |
yes |
17:23 |
DTA7 |
Ok, thanks |
17:30 |
paramat |
on that subject. in rapidly used code, is 'static const thing = g_settings->get..()' just as optimal as using a cache variable that does 'g_settings->get..()' once outside the rapidly used code? |
17:32 |
DTA7 |
Yes, it is only initialized once per thread |
17:34 |
DTA7 |
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/storage_duration |
17:35 |
DTA7 |
In the section "Static local variables" |
17:38 |
DTA7 |
(with thread_local I mean, otherwise once per program) |
17:48 |
paramat |
yea i know, but i was wondering if despite that one is slightly more optimal than the other |
17:51 |
|
jordan4ibanez joined #minetest-dev |
18:08 |
|
ThomasMonroe joined #minetest-dev |
18:09 |
|
DTA7 joined #minetest-dev |
18:15 |
|
nerzhul joined #minetest-dev |
18:15 |
|
t7 joined #minetest-dev |
18:15 |
|
Puka joined #minetest-dev |
18:32 |
DTA7 |
Oh ok, I don't know, where else would you cache the setting? |
18:39 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
18:40 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
19:09 |
|
t7 joined #minetest-dev |
19:15 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
19:38 |
paramat |
dunno :} |
19:54 |
|
DTA7 joined #minetest-dev |
20:24 |
|
bigfoot547 joined #minetest-dev |
20:24 |
|
bigfoot547 joined #minetest-dev |
20:27 |
|
bigfoot547 joined #minetest-dev |
20:39 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
20:43 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
21:02 |
|
ThomasMonroe joined #minetest-dev |
21:12 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
22:08 |
|
johnnyjoy joined #minetest-dev |
22:49 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
23:09 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
23:10 |
|
Natechip joined #minetest-dev |
23:13 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
23:21 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
23:23 |
|
AntumD joined #minetest-dev |
23:26 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
23:28 |
|
AntumDeluge joined #minetest-dev |
23:29 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
23:32 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
23:36 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
23:41 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |