Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:06 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
00:19 |
|
est31 joined #minetest |
00:20 |
|
fling joined #minetest |
00:23 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
00:29 |
|
kyle56 joined #minetest |
00:33 |
kyle56 |
and now! for something no one asked for!! My list of the top 3 most anticipated features coming to minetest 5.9.0! number 3, pointability override. number 2, set_bone_override(), and number 1! URL buttons. |
00:40 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
00:57 |
|
ShadowBot joined #minetest |
01:13 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
01:30 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
01:31 |
|
Kimapr joined #minetest |
01:47 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
02:02 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
02:21 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
02:38 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
02:56 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
03:13 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
03:31 |
|
amfl2 joined #minetest |
03:40 |
|
amfl joined #minetest |
03:40 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
03:51 |
|
Blockhead256 joined #minetest |
03:52 |
Blockhead256 |
!tell kyle56: sounds good. You could post it over in the "New feature hypte thread" -> https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?t=29936 |
03:52 |
MinetestBot |
Blockhead256: Do not put an : at the end of nickname |
03:52 |
Blockhead256 |
!tell kyle56 sounds good. You could post it over in the "New feature hypte thread" -> https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?t=29936 |
03:52 |
MinetestBot |
Blockhead256: I'll pass that on when kyle56 is around |
03:52 |
Blockhead256 |
thank you MinetestBot |
03:52 |
Blockhead256 |
mwah |
03:56 |
|
sivarajan joined #minetest |
04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
04:03 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
04:20 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
04:51 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
05:19 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
05:37 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
05:53 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
05:59 |
|
TomTom joined #minetest |
06:06 |
|
gregon joined #minetest |
06:06 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
06:22 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
06:30 |
|
tarsovbak joined #minetest |
06:39 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
06:56 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
07:07 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
07:23 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
07:36 |
|
bdju joined #minetest |
07:40 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
07:52 |
|
Talkless joined #minetest |
07:58 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
08:07 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #minetest |
08:08 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #minetest |
08:22 |
|
Warr1024 joined #minetest |
08:24 |
|
jaca122 joined #minetest |
08:27 |
|
fling joined #minetest |
08:27 |
|
PoochInquisitor joined #minetest |
08:42 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
08:44 |
|
Hanicef joined #minetest |
08:46 |
|
Warr1024 joined #minetest |
08:59 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
09:05 |
|
olliy joined #minetest |
09:09 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
09:11 |
|
amfl2 joined #minetest |
09:25 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
09:39 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
09:43 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
09:52 |
|
ireallyhateirc joined #minetest |
10:00 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
10:10 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
10:26 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
10:43 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
11:01 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
11:11 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
11:22 |
|
fling joined #minetest |
11:26 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
11:28 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #minetest |
11:40 |
|
shaft joined #minetest |
11:41 |
shaft |
Requesting review of https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/pull/3123 and merge of https://github.com/minetest-mods/mesecons/pull/669 |
11:43 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
12:03 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
12:11 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
12:14 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
13:13 |
|
whitepaperkat joined #minetest |
14:13 |
|
silverwolf73828_ joined #minetest |
14:35 |
|
dv^_^ joined #minetest |
14:59 |
shaft |
I have a stupid issue |
15:00 |
MTDiscord |
<greenxenith> Welcome to the club |
15:00 |
MTDiscord |
<greenxenith> Meetings are on the 32nd of each month |
15:00 |
shaft |
I added universal wood support to my mod Tables and Chairs. I did it with minetest.register_on_mods_loaded and now the inventory recipes tab doesn't show the recipes anymore. |
15:01 |
shaft |
I suspect it's doing the same thing |
15:01 |
shaft |
Can I set some priority flag or something? |
15:02 |
ireallyhateirc |
I think recipes can be only registered before runtime |
15:02 |
ireallyhateirc |
and "on_mods_loaded" is after that |
15:03 |
shaft |
registering works just fine anytime. They are craftable |
15:03 |
shaft |
Just don't show up in the recipes list |
15:05 |
ireallyhateirc |
perhaps the code that is responsible for getting recipe list runs before all mods get loaded? |
15:06 |
ireallyhateirc |
try not using minetest.register_on_mods_loaded and see what happens |
15:06 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> shaft: chances are the mod that shows recipes also uses register_on_mods_loaded |
15:06 |
shaft |
I have a better idea |
15:06 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> and ends up running before your mod, because it registers first |
15:06 |
shaft |
I hijack register_nodes |
15:06 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> if what lars says is correct, just insert your callback at the front of the stack |
15:07 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> one possible hack would be to do something like table.insert(1, minetest.registered_on_mods_loaded, function(...) ... end) to ensure that you run "first" |
15:07 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> (what wsor said) |
15:11 |
|
silverwolf73828 joined #minetest |
15:14 |
shaft |
That works but not with my crafting mod. (because it's a mod and thus not guaranteed to be loaded first) |
15:14 |
shaft |
May not work with other inventory mods too |
15:16 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> what |
15:17 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> this is for the mod that registers recipes in on_mods_loaded, not for the crafting mod |
15:17 |
|
MacroFaxSax joined #minetest |
15:17 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> the crafting mod wants to run last, not first, to catch all recipes |
15:17 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> otherwise it could hook the recipe registration functions |
15:19 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> the mod that registers recipes wants to run its on_loaded before the crafting mod's on_loaded runs |
15:22 |
shaft |
No, you're right. |
15:25 |
shaft |
btw table.insert has the table as first argument luatic |
15:25 |
shaft |
Works great |
15:28 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> yeah shaft you're right, i mixed the order up there |
15:30 |
sfan5 |
sounds like the crafting mod should be using minetest.after(0) |
15:33 |
shaft |
But MTGs inventory mod isn't either. It's fine. I think prepending to minetest.registered_on_mods_loaded is a great solution. |
15:34 |
sfan5 |
no, it's a hack |
15:34 |
shaft |
How? |
15:35 |
shaft |
Even if I fixed up my crafting mod and I may do that, I still can't expect all games and mods by other people to do the same thing, so I have to do it this way for my furniture mod |
15:36 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> minetest loading in general is a hack, it gets worse when your doing mapgen things, given they dont actually error, just silently fail |
15:39 |
sfan5 |
it is a solution for you in your mods, but multiple mods cannot truly be "first" and this might also depends on the loading order relative to the crafting mod. so in short, the craftings mods still have to be fixed or it will just be bandaid |
15:40 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
15:40 |
ireallyhateirc |
would be great if MT offered a way to specify mod loading order, afaik currently we have only " Allow game to specify first and last mod in mod loading order (#14177) " |
15:40 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14177 -- Allow game to specify first and last mod in mod loading order. by sfence |
15:41 |
shaft |
Yes but inventory mods will append and mods that add recipes prepend and then the order is good enough |
15:42 |
shaft |
I don't expect people to make a mod for furniture mod. |
15:42 |
shaft |
my furniture mod |
15:43 |
shaft |
I expect woods to be added during the "regular" mod loading |
15:45 |
sfan5 |
ireallyhateirc: and what happens if two mods want to load first? |
15:46 |
sfan5 |
there's a reason the PR only defined this for games |
15:46 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> something like "reverse dependencies" as in "load before this mod" could be considered but tbh i think this would result in a mess |
15:47 |
shaft |
Who even cares, who's really first? Some people may think they absolutely have to be first but then someone makes a mod that has to load before that person. |
15:47 |
ireallyhateirc |
you mean in my imaginary feature? I guess mods could declare what they need and based on that they'd get loading order |
15:47 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> i agree with sfan5 that the authors of mods need to provide proper APIs - or run at proper points in time |
15:48 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> in this case, what would be needed would rather be hooking of recipe registration, which can already be done. or, assuming recipes can't / aren't registered after on_mods_loaded, minetest.after(0, ...) as sfan said. |
15:48 |
ireallyhateirc |
sfan5, though I'm not a maintainer of a mod soup so I don't really know what exactly would be needed or if there's a use case |
15:48 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> ireallyhateirc: this just sounds like our current dependency-based system with extra steps. |
15:58 |
ireallyhateirc |
well I guess solving problems like having two mods that want to modify default:foobar is the responsibility of a maintainer of the mod soup |
16:04 |
shaft |
Anyway, who will handle my PR? https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/pull/3123 |
16:04 |
|
fluxionary joined #minetest |
16:04 |
shaft |
I really want those cacti fixed. |
16:04 |
shaft |
Just the thought that someone is generating upside down cacti somewhere on earth horrifies me. |
16:04 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> i'm kinda tempted to just smack the approve button, but first i'll have to ensure there's no jia tanning happening here lol. the joys of binary files... |
16:05 |
shaft |
Yes, please test |
16:06 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> I will, just let me finish some engine things first |
16:06 |
shaft |
okay |
16:27 |
|
Sharpman joined #minetest |
17:07 |
shaft |
My wishlist for 5.9: texture aliasing, fallback styling for ui elements, glTF support |
17:08 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> given only one of those has a pr unlikely, also if the core devs decide to start feature freeze any time soon gltf wont make it in as its a feature |
17:10 |
shaft |
Come on. Texture aliasing shouldn't be too much work and is absolutely crucial |
17:10 |
shaft |
My texture pack basically can't do shit except support tiny mods and MTG without it. |
17:11 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> there only 81 other prs to pick from before one that doesnt exist. also that one issue is only one in 1.2k |
17:11 |
shaft |
Gotta prioritize right |
17:11 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> if you want to improve the odds, write the pr |
17:12 |
shaft |
Merge my fucking PRs before telling me to create new ones |
17:12 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> you dont have any engine prs |
17:12 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> i mean, convincing devs that something is high value / low effort is also a good idea to improve the odds, but doesn't really help when the devs already have plenty of stuff going on :P |
17:13 |
shaft |
Mhttps://github.com/minetest-mods/mesecons/pull/669 |
17:13 |
shaft |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/pull/3123 |
17:13 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> anyways i'll test your MTG PR now |
17:13 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> you made prs two both orgs/repos that are known to take forever with prs lol |
17:14 |
shaft |
That's always your excuse. Then make it quicker |
17:14 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
17:15 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> im not a member of either of those. the orgs im a part of and cdb are much faster |
17:33 |
MacroFaxSax |
shaft: STFU |
17:34 |
shaft |
what's wrong with you? you always bitch about nothing |
17:35 |
MacroFaxSax |
Don't cry now. :/ |
17:39 |
MinetestBot |
[git] mruncreative -> minetest/minetest_game: Fix upside down nodes in large cactus schematic (#3123) 5116192 https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/commit/511619253facd524df75ae44537d7b2c4e30a8db (2024-06-02T17:38:35Z) |
17:39 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> shaft: we need no "excuses", i don't get what you're complaining about here; your MTG PR hasn't even been waiting for a single day |
17:40 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> and yes, it's definitely important that different orgs and teams have different load and different expected response times |
17:40 |
shaft |
I'm not trying to offend. Just being pushy, so we push forward |
17:41 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> being pushy doesn't have any advantage over polite probing |
17:42 |
shaft |
Polite probing does even less |
17:43 |
definitelya |
shaft: So you are a troll after all. |
17:43 |
shaft |
With the amount of work I put into my packages and PRs, definitely not |
17:44 |
|
PoochInquisitor joined #minetest |
17:46 |
sfan5 |
fortunately quality of work cannot compensate for good manners |
17:47 |
ROllerozxa |
"you attract more bees with honey than with vinegar" |
17:47 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
17:48 |
shaft |
Bees are annoying as fuck, yet you keep them. Same with me |
17:48 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> speaking from personal experience, yes sometimes i forget, or prioritize poorly, etc etc, and then i appreciate a polite reminder. |
17:48 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> if however someone is being "pushy" or rude, this will slightly annoy me, especially if i planned to get to them anyways. |
17:48 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> this will make me (or other devs) less inclined to work with you, as you've already seen in the past, and will continue to see in the future, if you don't improve your manners. |
17:49 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> when we have to choose between working with someone who respects us and our time and someone who doesn't - or at least doesn't communicate this properly - we're inclined to pick the former. |
17:50 |
shaft |
I just couldn't think of a better pun than "pushy". Don't take my words apart |
17:50 |
shaft |
I do respect you and your work |
17:52 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> happy to hear that, however it doesn't come across that way if you write things like "That's always your excuse. Then make it quicker", which sounds pretty demanding (note: in reply to someone who isn't involved in reviewing your PRs) |
17:55 |
shaft |
I mean your (plural as a community). Maybe I should say our. |
17:55 |
shaft |
It's our excuse. (me included) |
17:57 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> phrasing it that way would certainly have helped, but still i think it doesn't go in the right direction |
17:58 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> a better idea would be to actually suggest and discuss ways to reduce wait times - if that is deemed necessary. do we need more reviewers? if so, where can we get them in the long run? do we need to triage stricter? etc etc. |
18:02 |
shaft |
I did that. I already proposed myself to review packages on contentDB occasionally. |
18:03 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> contentdb already has an average 2 day turn around time, now the bus factor on the other hand |
18:03 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
18:04 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> shaft: even if that had a positive impact on CDB, that would've hardly impacted engine or MTG dev |
18:06 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> (not to mention that, even if a team is severely understaffed (which the CDB team doesn't seem to be?), a solid foundation of trust first needs to be established) |
18:06 |
shaft |
Well if I can't do it then you need to do it and I don't see how it's any different for those repos |
18:07 |
shaft |
you (plural) |
18:12 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> anyways, minetest engine org, and minetest-mods org slowness has been discussed at length before. while still not ideal, both seem to at least gotten somewhat better |
18:21 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
18:24 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> now if you want to see a trival pr that takes about two seconds to approve and has been in hell for two weeks ............. https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/14680 |
18:25 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> let me guess it's GX's PR |
18:25 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> yes lol |
18:26 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> pokes lars to review it |
18:26 |
|
liceDibrarian joined #minetest |
18:34 |
|
grorp joined #minetest |
18:36 |
|
grorp1 joined #minetest |
18:43 |
|
PoochInquisitor joined #minetest |
18:52 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #minetest |
18:52 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
18:55 |
ireallyhateirc |
Minetest doesn't need .mtl files produced by Blender? |
18:55 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> correct |
18:56 |
ireallyhateirc |
great, time to trash them :) |
18:56 |
|
olliy joined #minetest |
19:00 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
19:05 |
MinetestBot |
[git] grorp -> minetest/minetest: Allow toggling fullscreen without restart and add keybind (#14714) 833bb54 https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/833bb542fce78e2f94ca1b568c0b988234155621 (2024-06-02T19:05:16Z) |
19:05 |
MinetestBot |
[git] grorp -> minetest/minetest: Document keymap_toggle_block_bounds, remove unimplemented BLOCK_BOUND… 508b5cc https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/508b5ccc6386de700d39ff6e885d3dc553fd7d28 (2024-06-02T19:05:35Z) |
19:18 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
19:39 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
19:57 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
20:01 |
|
shaft joined #minetest |
20:03 |
shaft |
I found a real issue: Even when the formspec isn't being rewritten, sometimes it doesn't react to clicks. I first thought my mouse was being fucky but it's not the case. Like when you spam on an item in your inventory it only reacts to every third click but the scrollbar is sometimes not activating too. |
20:03 |
shaft |
In MTG inventory. |
20:03 |
|
Leopold joined #minetest |
20:04 |
shaft |
The thing with the item only being picked up is the same in VoxeLibre. |
20:04 |
shaft |
But the scrollbar behaviour is weird |
20:10 |
shaft |
ENGINE BUG. |
20:11 |
shaft |
I just had my mouse over a wide scrollbar clicked on it and the little scroller wouldn't move to it. |
20:11 |
|
olliy joined #minetest |
20:12 |
shaft |
And it happens especially often when you just moved the curser on top of the scrollbar! |
20:18 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
20:19 |
shaft |
You can try reproducing it in my mod commit 5c4909d7e86698c642c074d9d128fa22f2079516 https://gitgud.io/blut/simple_crafting/ |
20:20 |
shaft |
The world scrollbar in the main menu works fine though, so it can't be an engine bug. |
20:21 |
shaft |
What a pain. |
20:22 |
shaft |
Does the main menu use formspec? |
20:25 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> yes |
20:25 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> file an issue with a minimally reproducable example please |
20:25 |
shaft |
But the main menu works. It must be with the games then right? |
20:26 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> main menu has basically the same formspec api as games do |
20:36 |
Mantar |
did you click a tab? 5.8.0 has a bug where the formspec loses focus when you click a tab and nothing works until you click the formspec again |
20:36 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
20:36 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> shaft: this sounds an awful lot like #14702 |
20:36 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14702 -- Fix scrolling in scroll containers by appgurueu |
20:36 |
|
boingman joined #minetest |
20:37 |
shaft |
The fuck |
20:37 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> if it is the tab bug, you could try #14661 - but that wouldn't explain losing "every third click" or something like that, so the former seems more plausible |
20:37 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14661 -- Fix inventory items unresponsive after tab interaction until LMB click on formspec by sfence |
20:38 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> shaft: could you check whether one of these PRs fixes your issue? |
20:39 |
shaft |
No idea. Am I supposed to compile all of those and test? |
20:39 |
shaft |
I'm playing with an appimage on linux mint |
20:39 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> finally, there is also in principle the option of another, overlapping element preventing the event from "getting through"; but again this should be consistent. hence why i think 14702 is most likely. |
20:40 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> shaft: yes, you'd have to compile these to test |
20:41 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> anyways afk |
20:41 |
shaft |
But yes, not all events come through it seems. When I click on an inventory item slowly, it picks it up but when I spam the mouse button it picks it up on the first click does nothing on the second, and places it down on the third |
20:42 |
shaft |
I'm not sure this is related to the scrollbar though or intented behaviour |
20:42 |
shaft |
It just feels weird |
20:42 |
Mantar |
that is weird |
20:59 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
21:22 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
21:39 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
21:45 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
21:48 |
shaft |
Damn I'm retarded. A fucking scrollcontainer was overlapping just slightly on the left. I don't know why though. The scrollbar had position x 3 width 0.4 and the overlapping scrollbar had position x 4.5 |
21:50 |
shaft |
* The scrollbar had position x 3 width 0.4 and the overlapping scroll_container had position x 4.5 |
21:50 |
shaft |
How does that math even work? |
21:51 |
shaft |
Why is 3+0.4 > 4.5 |
21:53 |
shaft |
I feel the width and height don't use the same units as the x and y |
21:53 |
shaft |
Can someone explain that? |
21:53 |
shaft |
https://content.minetest.net/packages/shaft/simple_crafting/ |
21:54 |
shaft |
That's the mod. Just install and you'll notice the left edge of the scrollbar doesn't work because the right scrollcontainer overlaps with it. |
21:54 |
shaft |
But why? |
21:56 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
21:56 |
Mantar |
which coordinate system are you using? |
21:57 |
shaft |
formspec |
21:58 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> you mod uses formspec v1, have fun with that hell hole |
21:59 |
shaft |
Why are there different formspecs? |
21:59 |
Mantar |
yeah the old coord system was a terrible kludgey mess, you want to switch to the new coord system if possible |
21:59 |
shaft |
Can't you use the newest one by default? |
21:59 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> >= v2 |
21:59 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> nope |
22:00 |
shaft |
PLEASE |
22:00 |
Mantar |
because the system was cobbled together all nibbly bibbly, and then mods began using it, so the MT team couldn't remove the old system, they had to build a new one alongside it |
22:00 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> formspecs are client side, so typically you want to pick the minum minetest version you want to support |
22:00 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> see https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/doc/lua_api.md#version-history |
22:00 |
Mantar |
recent FS versions are much nicer and more sensible |
22:01 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> i mean, fs1 to fs2 was the big improvement due to cords system. after that its just the same terrible formspec system |
22:01 |
Mantar |
MT can't assume you want the new version though or old mods will break |
22:01 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> you can write for the latest version and then let fs51 handle back compat ish |
22:03 |
shaft |
I put formspec_version[7] before size but nothing changes |
22:03 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> 5.4 is a good minium minetest version to pick for support, becuase you get all the useful new formspec elements, and also thats when the new node alpha params became a thing |
22:04 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
22:07 |
shaft |
do you need to prepend formspec before everything or just the size element? |
22:08 |
shaft |
Where do I need to put it in my mod? |
22:12 |
shaft |
why does mtg not contain "formspec_version["? |
22:20 |
shaft |
Okay prepending formspec_version[7] to the entire inventory formspec works but it screws it up. Am I supposed to remake the inventory or can I just throw a container or window on top of it that is formspec 7? |
22:23 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
22:27 |
shaft |
real_coordinates[true] after size does just that. Thank god |
22:35 |
|
panwolfram joined #minetest |
22:40 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
22:55 |
|
appguru joined #minetest |
22:57 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
23:07 |
|
nopjmp_ joined #minetest |
23:15 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
23:24 |
shaft |
damn I'm so tired now. Thanks for helping me out wsor. I'll go to bed now |
23:29 |
Mantar |
'night |
23:33 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |
23:41 |
ireallyhateirc |
is there a way to disable Minetest's map overgeneration? |
23:44 |
|
BluebirdGrey51 joined #minetest |
23:45 |
|
BluebirdGrey39 joined #minetest |
23:49 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest |