| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:00 |
|
AliasStillTaken joined #minetest |
| 01:01 |
|
smk joined #minetest |
| 01:02 |
Pope_Rigby |
Is there a way to see which mod an item comes from? |
| 01:11 |
|
sabino joined #minetest |
| 01:11 |
MinetestBot |
sabino: Aug-06 06:46 UTC <BuckarooBanzai> which version of the `pipeworks` mod are you running? And, about the wrench: which fork of `technic` are you using? afaik in the https://github.com/mt-mods/technic fork the wrench is almost completely rewritten and should work for almost everything chest-like |
| 01:12 |
sabino |
hello! there is a version of minetest on microsoft store. Is the official? |
| 01:12 |
sabino |
https://www.microsoft.com/store/productId/9NZ5P9FHDG1M |
| 01:12 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> no |
| 01:12 |
MTDiscord |
<Warr1024> It wouldn't be 4 releases behind if it were official |
| 01:13 |
MTDiscord |
<Warr1024> Also it would almost certainly not cost money |
| 01:15 |
sabino |
yeah, it was that I think. But the people shouldn't sell a project if they dont has a copyright |
| 01:20 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest |
| 02:00 |
|
beanzilla joined #minetest |
| 02:03 |
|
sparky4 joined #minetest |
| 02:06 |
|
stevet2 joined #minetest |
| 02:15 |
|
stevet joined #minetest |
| 02:40 |
|
diceLibrarian joined #minetest |
| 03:26 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
| 04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest |
| 04:29 |
|
air joined #minetest |
| 04:38 |
|
specing joined #minetest |
| 04:47 |
celeron55 |
yeah that's ridiculous. feels like M$ is trying to gouge my eyes out |
| 04:49 |
celeron55 |
i wonder how easy it is to upload something there |
| 04:50 |
celeron55 |
i think it could be worth it to me for the low price of $1/copy |
| 04:50 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> krita, some other projects charge on the ms store, steam, for people who want the convince/want to donate to the project |
| 04:51 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> that specific listing has been reported multiple times |
| 04:51 |
celeron55 |
i really don't want to endorse that store though, or any other store |
| 04:51 |
celeron55 |
so maybe 10$ just to keep people away |
| 04:51 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> relevant https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/12605 |
| 04:54 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> krita charges $15 us, so $10 wouldnt be that bad https://apps.microsoft.com/store/detail/krita/9N6X57ZGRW96?hl=en-us&gl=US |
| 04:55 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> if i assume they take the max, $1.50 us, still leaves you with $8.50 us per purchase |
| 04:55 |
celeron55 |
we kind of need a minetest store team whose only task would be to spam MT into every crappy store there is every time a release is made. it's not something developers should have to think about |
| 04:56 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> id volunteer |
| 04:56 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> however, i think that the things pointed out in the issue should be resolved first |
| 04:56 |
celeron55 |
and every store listing should say downloading directly from minetest.net is recommended and free |
| 04:57 |
MTDiscord |
<Jonathon> or you could just release it for free ? |
| 04:58 |
celeron55 |
basically use the stores as advertisements for minetest.net |
| 05:01 |
celeron55 |
well, devs probably aren't very interested in supporting crappy platforms that have crappy stores so the store team needs someone who can hack each release into working at the various stores and their platforms |
| 05:05 |
|
calcul0n_ joined #minetest |
| 05:13 |
|
TomTom joined #minetest |
| 06:17 |
|
Lesha_Vel joined #minetest |
| 06:28 |
|
definitelya joined #minetest |
| 06:51 |
air |
can shadows be toggled inside the game? |
| 07:05 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #minetest |
| 07:39 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #minetest |
| 08:05 |
|
sometalgoo joined #minetest |
| 08:24 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
| 08:28 |
mrkubax10 |
air: you can use this mod https://content.minetest.net/packages/ROllerozxa/enable_shadows/ |
| 08:30 |
air |
I meant a command or key to toggle them in the client |
| 08:31 |
air |
I can type "/set enable_dynamic_shadows true/false" but I think the shaders need to be reloaded for it to work |
| 08:32 |
mrkubax10 |
ah, then I'm not sure |
| 08:52 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
| 08:59 |
|
lemonzest joined #minetest |
| 09:08 |
AliasStillTaken |
Can someone help me un-riddle a couple of log messages? I get these even during login: 2022-08-16 09:07:23: VERBOSE[ConnectionSend]: con(4/1)RE-SENDING timed-out RELIABLE to 2001:9e8:339b:900:8484:e846:2f5a:db79(t/o=0.1): count=1, channel=0, seqnum=4132 |
| 09:08 |
AliasStillTaken |
That's my IP v6 address |
| 09:16 |
celeron55 |
that means your or the server's network connection (or something in between, or the server itself) is dropping some packets. it's normal to a slight extent as it's the way programs detect available bandwidth, but if there's a lot then it could be a network issue |
| 09:18 |
AliasStillTaken |
That would be odd - it's a 1 GBit connection serverside, which according to serverstats is hardly at its limit. On my ide its only 100 Mbit, but still enough bandwidth available. |
| 09:19 |
AliasStillTaken |
Ofc real life distance doesn't always say something about network distance, but ping to the machine is 18 ms |
| 09:19 |
AliasStillTaken |
And I live about 100 km away :D |
| 09:20 |
Ingar |
that's less than 12 parsec! |
| 09:21 |
AliasStillTaken |
What bothers me most is that my server has odd episodes of chatlag. With only 22 people on it, they feel their chat gets delayed by more than a minute occasionally |
| 09:21 |
AliasStillTaken |
Sometimes, 40 people happily dig and fight and there's no lag whatsoever |
| 09:22 |
AliasStillTaken |
2022-08-16 08:53:21: VERBOSE[ConnectionSend]: con(4/1)Possible packet stall to peer id: 5401 queued_commands=59436 |
| 09:22 |
AliasStillTaken |
I was suggested to add prometheus support, I did that on the testserver. (same machine, only port 30001 instead) |
| 09:23 |
celeron55 |
have you done the obvious and started logging the round trip time and packet loss to the server using ping |
| 09:23 |
celeron55 |
and looked at what that looks like when there are problems |
| 09:24 |
AliasStillTaken |
yes. ping is fine. server step is fine. the chatbridge that runs on the same machine gets the message way before we do in the client |
| 09:24 |
celeron55 |
something is obviously eating the packets so i hope you're friends with the relevant network admins |
| 09:24 |
AliasStillTaken |
It's odd: I send a mesasge. I can see in the log its there. Chatbridge hands it out. Only my (and the clients of *some* others) have a delay |
| 09:25 |
celeron55 |
:D |
| 09:25 |
AliasStillTaken |
It's a dedicated machine, the only clog we found was the MT server sending packets to clients |
| 09:27 |
AliasStillTaken |
But that's an area I'm not familiar with. How does the server decide when to send a packet? On each entity movement? Or does it compile info each serverstep into one packet to send to a client? |
| 09:28 |
celeron55 |
it sends separate packets for different things. as you can see the log message, it's re-sending a packet which means it didn't get an ACK from the client for a previous attempt |
| 09:29 |
celeron55 |
i.e. it already tried, and the client didn't respond (i assume this is the server's log) |
| 09:29 |
AliasStillTaken |
yes, its verbose log on the server |
| 09:30 |
celeron55 |
this can of course happen also if the packets get to the client but the responses don't get to the server |
| 09:31 |
AliasStillTaken |
I can watch clients from log. Even through those 1 minute lag episodes, whenever I do something on the client, it goes to the log immediately. |
| 09:31 |
AliasStillTaken |
So, the connection from client to server is ok, right? The result is processed, if its a chatmesage, the bridge hands it out |
| 09:32 |
AliasStillTaken |
But when the server wants to tell my client "hey, there's someone chatting, this is the mesage!" it doesn't reach the client |
| 09:32 |
celeron55 |
that does sound like the problem is outgoing packets at the server, or incoming packets at the client |
| 09:33 |
AliasStillTaken |
Is there some hardcoded limit? |
| 09:33 |
AliasStillTaken |
It also says 2022-08-16 09:30:00: VERBOSE[ConnectionSend]: con(4/1)Ran out of sequence numbers! |
| 09:35 |
celeron55 |
the sequence numbers are a 16 bit integer which rolls over from 65535 to 0 |
| 09:35 |
celeron55 |
if i recall correctly |
| 09:36 |
celeron55 |
so maybe there are 65535 packets queued? seems like a lot |
| 09:36 |
AliasStillTaken |
If they roll over, under what circumstances would they run out then? |
| 09:36 |
celeron55 |
well you can't reuse a number before the packet has been acknowledged by the client |
| 09:36 |
AliasStillTaken |
The server is not entirely lightweight :D I can read out any values that you want me to, but I wouldn't know which |
| 09:37 |
proller |
... still not switched to enet or other working proto.... ;) |
| 09:37 |
celeron55 |
is there a chance it's just trying to send impossible large amounts of data to the client and MT's poor little network stack can't handle it? |
| 09:38 |
AliasStillTaken |
How can I gauge this? |
| 09:41 |
BuckarooBanzai |
last time i had issues like this i tested the connection with iperf3 (https://github.com/esnet/iperf) and udp always had some losses, about 10% iirc from my residential connection to a vps a couple 100km away |
| 09:41 |
celeron55 |
the client logs a "Client packetcounter" list every 30 seconds |
| 09:42 |
BuckarooBanzai |
but the engine did a good job re-transmitting those, never had too much network-lag problems |
| 09:42 |
celeron55 |
you could take a look what that's showing |
| 09:42 |
celeron55 |
the server doesn't have anything similar i think |
| 09:42 |
AliasStillTaken |
I assume I should enable verbose log on the client, too? |
| 09:42 |
AliasStillTaken |
Then what would I grep for? |
| 09:43 |
celeron55 |
it's at the info log level |
| 09:43 |
celeron55 |
that exact string, "Client packetcounter". the list comes after that as one line per packet type |
| 09:43 |
celeron55 |
each line starting with "cmd" |
| 09:47 |
AliasStillTaken |
https://pastebin.com/HTUXZ8Ha |
| 09:48 |
AliasStillTaken |
A while later: 2022-08-16 11:47:37: INFO[Main]: cmd 67 (TOCLIENT_DETACHED_INVENTORY) count 10218 |
| 09:48 |
AliasStillTaken |
Are those "amount of poackets" ? |
| 09:49 |
celeron55 |
67 is the packet type in its numeric form, 10218 is the number of packets since the previous print |
| 09:49 |
celeron55 |
as a baseline that looks fine enough |
| 09:49 |
celeron55 |
well, 10218 of TOCLIENT_DETACHED_INVENTORY seems like a lot |
| 09:50 |
celeron55 |
but not like anything that would break it |
| 09:50 |
celeron55 |
or |
| 09:50 |
celeron55 |
well, depending on the number of players, it might, maybe? no idea |
| 09:51 |
AliasStillTaken |
THis recoridng is not from a chatlag episode. They happen "randomly", so I'd need to wait for one of those and see if the numbers are different |
| 09:51 |
celeron55 |
but i'd be looking if i could find more like 100 000 of some packet type |
| 09:52 |
celeron55 |
if you do, then you run into the problem that the server doesn't collect statistics about how much packets each mod is causing to be sent |
| 09:52 |
AliasStillTaken |
Ok, but if the server for some reason cannot send the packages out, then they wouldn't appear on the client anyways, right? |
| 09:53 |
celeron55 |
well |
| 09:53 |
celeron55 |
better just get the data first and then think |
| 09:53 |
sfan5 |
!c 10218 / 30 |
| 09:53 |
MinetestBot |
340.6 |
| 09:54 |
sfan5 |
as a rough number - expect for movement-related packets - more than 10 per second of any packet type is too much |
| 09:54 |
sfan5 |
except* |
| 09:54 |
celeron55 |
yes it's clearly a lot of players being active or a mod doing something it probably shouldn't |
| 09:55 |
celeron55 |
but it shouldn't break the protocol |
| 09:55 |
AliasStillTaken |
so this detached inventory (largest amount i've seen so far was 12553) is not so good? |
| 09:55 |
celeron55 |
let's say there's a 50% chance you'll see a ridiculous number in that when the problem occurs |
| 09:57 |
|
Flabb joined #minetest |
| 09:58 |
AliasStillTaken |
Alright. Anything else I could record/look at/read out when the next episode arrives? |
| 09:58 |
sfan5 |
the entire network traffic with wireshark |
| 09:59 |
AliasStillTaken |
The problem is not wiresharking the data. The problem is making sense of what I gathered |
| 10:00 |
AliasStillTaken |
Regarding prometheus: What value would I look at there? |
| 10:00 |
AliasStillTaken |
Unfortunately I only enabled it on the testserver yet |
| 10:00 |
sfan5 |
not sure if it has something relevant out of the box |
| 10:01 |
sfan5 |
re wireshark: the dissector can help here but you can also give the capture to me and I can interpret it for you |
| 10:02 |
AliasStillTaken |
to add prometheus to the main server, I need to recompile anyways. If there's stuff we can add to get more relvant readings, I'd like to test them oin the tesserver first |
| 10:05 |
AliasStillTaken |
lol. We just hit another chatlag episode, but the packet numbers went down |
| 10:06 |
AliasStillTaken |
https://pastebin.com/kHUWBiSK |
| 10:07 |
AliasStillTaken |
In this paste, the lag started between 2022-08-16 12:04:08 and 2022-08-16 12:04:38 |
| 10:09 |
AliasStillTaken |
Na packets in the 100k range. |
| 10:09 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> Chatlag may not be related to packet problems |
| 10:10 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> I can imagine that a bad mod causes lags in one case and sends a lot of packets in another |
| 10:10 |
AliasStillTaken |
It's not only chatlag. All actions, inventory, fight, anything that is sent from server to client is delayed |
| 10:10 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> Yeah, a classic server lag. Smth blocked the main thread. |
| 10:11 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> It could be a network problem too tho |
| 10:12 |
AliasStillTaken |
server is on a 1 Gbit connection, all other network related back and forth runs nicely |
| 10:17 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> Doesn't prometheus have smth like server lag metric? You should look into that. |
| 10:25 |
AliasStillTaken |
You mean minetest_core_latency ? |
| 10:29 |
AliasStillTaken |
If I'm not terribly mistaken, those are the metrics I can see via prometheus: https://pastebin.com/M6Tx61BE |
| 10:29 |
AliasStillTaken |
(disregard the values of the paste, they're from another test instance) |
| 10:36 |
AliasStillTaken |
perf top gives me con::ReliablePacketBuffer::insert as one of the toppermost functions |
| 10:37 |
AliasStillTaken |
(along with server::ActiveObjectMgr::getObjectsInsideRadius) |
| 10:43 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> yes minetest_core_latency |
| 10:46 |
AliasStillTaken |
That would be the same as the dtime value ingame, right? On the main server I set server step to 0.044, which is not affected by the chatlag episodes |
| 11:00 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> chatlag doesn't affect dtime? |
| 11:00 |
AliasStillTaken |
No. When I send a message ingame during chatlag, the chat bridge immedialte yrelay it to discord |
| 11:01 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> but other players don't see it? |
| 11:01 |
AliasStillTaken |
That tells me client to server is ok, server lua is ok, server to localhost http is ok, but server to clients is not ok |
| 11:01 |
AliasStillTaken |
I don't see it myself until the server says I can have the message :D |
| 11:02 |
AliasStillTaken |
That's how I measure delay between discord message and ingame message |
| 11:04 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> sus |
| 11:05 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> Then the server fails to send packets indeed |
| 11:08 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> Probably the server thinks that's enough for me and drops all packets in the queue |
| 11:09 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> That's why packet number counters went down |
| 11:10 |
AliasStillTaken |
You mean client side? Yes, we came to the same conclusion |
| 11:11 |
AliasStillTaken |
For some reason server says "I'd like to send out this bazillion of packets, but ... I don't" |
| 11:12 |
AliasStillTaken |
dedicated_server_step = 0.044 |
| 11:12 |
AliasStillTaken |
<- Is that too fast maybe? |
| 11:12 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #minetest |
| 11:13 |
celeron55 |
i wouldn't set it that fast, there's really no benefit |
| 11:13 |
AliasStillTaken |
Actually there is, people felt it was much more responsive |
| 11:13 |
AliasStillTaken |
What's the minimum reasonable value? |
| 11:14 |
celeron55 |
well, anything, as long as you know your game can take it |
| 11:14 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> Is there anything in server logs during the chatlag about how many packets it dropped? |
| 11:14 |
AliasStillTaken |
Same goes for max_packets_per_iteration? |
| 11:16 |
celeron55 |
never played with that setting, i don't actually even know what "iteration" means |
| 11:16 |
AliasStillTaken |
Since the lua thread is fine during chatlag episodes, the dtime during normal gameplay hardly ever increases beyond 0.1, only during heavy monster invasion events we get ticks of 0.2 or 0.3, I'd say the machine can take it. If you disagree and say better set it to x, I'll do |
| 11:17 |
|
appguru joined #minetest |
| 11:19 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> It can be that a mod changes smth every globalstep and it causes the server to send packets. So the less dedicated_server_step, the more packets. |
| 11:20 |
AliasStillTaken |
Yes, ofc. But the quesiton is, why can't the server send out those packets? |
| 11:21 |
appguru |
The server probably sends them out but they fail to reach the clients |
| 11:21 |
appguru |
So the server tries to resend and the queue fills up |
| 11:21 |
|
mrkubax10 joined #minetest |
| 11:22 |
AliasStillTaken |
This would indicate a problem on clients to receive that many packets. I need to compare wireshark of the server and wireshark of the client |
| 11:22 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> The queue is per client. They fail to reach all the clients? |
| 11:23 |
AliasStillTaken |
At least some of them. But during those episodes, at least half of the population claims they feel lag |
| 11:23 |
AliasStillTaken |
Also, we have messages like this: 2022-08-16 08:53:21: VERBOSE[ConnectionSend]: con(4/1)Possible packet stall to peer id: 5401 queued_commands=59436 |
| 11:24 |
AliasStillTaken |
Tehre is no way to match peer id to a playername? |
| 11:24 |
celeron55 |
looks like max_packets_per_iteration divided by player count is the maximum number of commands to try to send per ConnectionSendThread loop iteration, and that loop doesn't run at a consistent rate but does a 50ms sleep between iterations except when it's waken up by the engine wanting to send a packet. so 50ms when nothing is sent but waiting for timeouts, otherwise no delay |
| 11:24 |
celeron55 |
command is an MT network stack concept, it translates into one or more packets depending on how large the payload is |
| 11:26 |
definitelya |
savilli: Yes, some of the authors of the mods may assume you are just hosting a server with lightly modded MTG, and at this scale the server just can't keep up. |
| 11:26 |
celeron55 |
AliasStillTaken: grep the log for INFO[Server]: Server: New connection: "singleplayer" from 127.0.0.1 (peer_id=2) |
| 11:27 |
AliasStillTaken |
Ok, thanks :) |
| 11:32 |
AliasStillTaken |
Could that 50ms send the network thread into a sleep-wake cycle, when server step is lower than 50 ms? |
| 11:33 |
celeron55 |
? |
| 11:33 |
celeron55 |
your problem is definitely not there |
| 11:37 |
|
sometalgoo1 joined #minetest |
| 11:57 |
AliasStillTaken |
Someone tried to log in to the server, but supplied and empty password. I have a single attempt from this IP address in the log. However, this prompted a lot of those : 2022-08-16 11:53:40: VERBOSE[ConnectionSend]: con(4/1)RE-SENDING timed-out RELIABLE to ::ffff:HIS_IP_ADDRESS(t/o=0.708): count=3, channel=2, seqnum=24876 |
| 12:19 |
BuckarooBanzai |
AliasStillTaken: did you take a look at this: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10088#issuecomment-647723155 ? |
| 12:23 |
BuckarooBanzai |
(re: the "timed-out RELIABLE" part) |
| 12:25 |
AliasStillTaken |
Thanks, didn't see that yet |
| 12:26 |
AliasStillTaken |
I'm still trying to wrap my head around wireshark atm |
| 12:30 |
|
orwell96 joined #minetest |
| 12:47 |
MinetestBot |
[git] rubenwardy -> minetest/minetest: Add package title to ContentDB error messages (#12705) c4ffe63 https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/c4ffe630f106712d5c655e642cfca10096efba3a (2022-08-16T12:46:11Z) |
| 12:50 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
| 12:55 |
sfan5 |
AliasStillTaken: do you have the a pcap of the traffic during before/the lag |
| 12:55 |
sfan5 |
eh messed up the word order |
| 12:55 |
sfan5 |
I think you still get it |
| 12:56 |
AliasStillTaken |
Yes :D I still experiment with how to generate a pcap file |
| 12:56 |
sfan5 |
if you have the packets in wireshark you can just click save |
| 12:57 |
AliasStillTaken |
That's what I struggle with. If you have a simple recipe, I could certainly put it to work. |
| 12:59 |
AliasStillTaken |
Another drawback: Ever since the serverrestart, there was no chatlag episode -.- |
| 13:01 |
sfan5 |
you're struggling with the "have packets in wireshark" or the "save it" part? |
| 13:02 |
AliasStillTaken |
With the CLI of wireshark atm |
| 13:02 |
sfan5 |
tshark? |
| 13:04 |
AliasStillTaken |
Yes. Plus, some other questions around it. When I start logging, will that disconnect all the players? |
| 13:07 |
BuckarooBanzai |
AliasStillTaken: nope, this _should_ not affect anyone, it is usually just `tshark -i <interface-name> -w <outputfile>` (this will capture _all_ the traffic though, including non-encrypted stuff you may have running) |
| 13:08 |
BuckarooBanzai |
this should work better: `tshark -i <interface-name> -w <outputfile> "port 30000"` |
| 13:08 |
AliasStillTaken |
Will that not only capture incoming traffic? |
| 13:09 |
BuckarooBanzai |
it captures everything on that interface with source- or destination-port 30000 |
| 13:14 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest |
| 13:15 |
AliasStillTaken |
Sounds like you're familiar with wireshark a bit. How can I make it that I capture the episodes? Is there a way to rotate the capture file ? |
| 13:16 |
AliasStillTaken |
Like "the following 10 minutes everything goes to THIS file, the next 10 minutes everything goes to THAT file" ? |
| 13:16 |
AliasStillTaken |
I mean, sure, I could let it run continuously, but that would give us gigabytes of captures, right? |
| 13:17 |
AliasStillTaken |
Earlier today, the chatlag episodes were frequent, but after a serverrestart it takes a bit until the episodes start again |
| 13:17 |
BuckarooBanzai |
don't let that thing run continuously, it has some memory-leak issues :) |
| 13:17 |
BuckarooBanzai |
i usually just run it when something happens, otherwise you have TB's worth of captures and no idea where to start :/ |
| 13:19 |
AliasStillTaken |
That means I might miss what happens immediately before and the first few seconds of the event |
| 13:20 |
BuckarooBanzai |
there's a stop-condition parameter, let me check the --help quick... |
| 13:20 |
sfan5 |
-b <ringbuffer opt.> ..., --ring-buffer <ringbuffer opt.> |
| 13:20 |
sfan5 |
duration:NUM - switch to next file after NUM secs |
| 13:20 |
BuckarooBanzai |
`-a duration:3600` to run it for an hour for example |
| 13:21 |
BuckarooBanzai |
sfan5: you are too far below... |
| 13:21 |
BuckarooBanzai |
ah, sorry, my bad |
| 13:21 |
BuckarooBanzai |
no, this is exactly your use case :) |
| 13:21 |
sfan5 |
-b does more than -a depending on what AliasStillTaken needs |
| 13:22 |
sfan5 |
you also definitely want to run with -n and -M <some value here> to fix the memory "leaks" |
| 13:22 |
BuckarooBanzai |
yeah |
| 13:22 |
sfan5 |
this would perhaps be easier with tcpdump |
| 13:29 |
AliasStillTaken |
What's a nice value for -M? about 1 Million? |
| 13:30 |
sfan5 |
dunno, maybe 5000 |
| 13:31 |
AliasStillTaken |
Alright. That's what I cobbled together: tshark -i eno1 -w /root/administration156.pcap -b duration:180 -n -M 5000 "port 30000" |
| 13:33 |
sfan5 |
looks good |
| 13:37 |
AliasStillTaken |
Ok ... now comes the fun part: How do I filter out all chat and private messages? |
| 13:38 |
sfan5 |
if you have the minetest dissector installed in wireshark you can filter out all chat packets |
| 13:38 |
AliasStillTaken |
How do I do that? |
| 13:39 |
AliasStillTaken |
Sorry to bother you about such things, I have very little knowledge in ... a lot of parts of this adventure :D |
| 13:47 |
sfan5 |
you copy util/wireshark/minetest.lua to ~/.wireshark/plugins/ and use the following filter |
| 13:47 |
sfan5 |
!(minetest.server.command == 0x002f) |
| 13:48 |
sfan5 |
its not perfect since it can only take the first of a split packet into account but should be good enough unless your users PM eachother entire novels |
| 13:48 |
sfan5 |
you can also exclude auth information with types 0x51 0x52 and 0x60 |
| 13:51 |
sfan5 |
(those aren't cleartext anyway) |
| 13:53 |
AliasStillTaken |
Hm, I don't have a .wireshark directory ... |
| 14:19 |
MinetestBot |
[git] celeron55 -> minetest/minetest: Log sockets into tracestream instead of dstream (#12701) 3f67215 https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/3f67215df9dbc16f3bfe1ffc5c2582a308532914 (2022-08-16T14:18:11Z) |
| 14:26 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
| 14:40 |
|
FreeFull joined #minetest |
| 14:57 |
|
FreeFull joined #minetest |
| 15:16 |
sfan5 |
you can create those two obviously |
| 15:17 |
MTDiscord |
<PrairieWind> wireshark...you can check minetest packets? |
| 15:28 |
MTDiscord |
<savilli> Everyone can |
| 16:14 |
diceLibrarian |
they're usp |
| 16:14 |
diceLibrarian |
*udp |
| 16:36 |
|
specing_ joined #minetest |
| 16:50 |
|
Talkless joined #minetest |
| 17:31 |
|
creation joined #minetest |
| 18:54 |
|
appguru joined #minetest |
| 18:54 |
|
Verticen joined #minetest |
| 18:59 |
|
Guest2931 joined #minetest |
| 19:00 |
Guest2931 |
hi |
| 19:22 |
|
vampirefrog joined #minetest |
| 19:39 |
|
Clygro joined #minetest |
| 19:44 |
|
Clygro left #minetest |
| 19:57 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest |
| 20:29 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest |
| 21:35 |
|
Sven_vB joined #minetest |
| 21:46 |
|
natewrench joined #minetest |
| 21:50 |
|
Sven_vB joined #minetest |
| 21:51 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest |
| 22:31 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest |
| 22:33 |
|
panwolfram joined #minetest |
| 22:34 |
|
proller joined #minetest |
| 22:50 |
|
prairiewind[m] joined #minetest |
| 23:09 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest |
| 23:13 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest |
| 23:17 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest |
| 23:34 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest |
| 23:37 |
|
Lesha_Vel joined #minetest |
| 23:43 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest |
| 23:54 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest |
| 23:59 |
|
AliasAlreadyTake joined #minetest |
