Minetest logo

IRC log for #minetest-dev, 2024-05-07

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:02 YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev
00:54 YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev
01:00 ShadowBot joined #minetest-dev
01:02 Eragon joined #minetest-dev
01:31 Lupercus joined #minetest-dev
01:36 Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev
01:46 Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev
02:08 Lupercus joined #minetest-dev
02:18 Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev
04:00 MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev
05:21 Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev
06:25 MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev
08:32 YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev
08:32 Eragon joined #minetest-dev
08:54 Eragon joined #minetest-dev
11:06 MTDiscord <josiah_wi> #14565 should be easy to review given that it has concept approval and sfan5 has previously reviewed most of the changes.
11:06 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14565 -- Upgrade client active object mgr tests to Catch2 (reviving #13609) by JosiahWI
11:07 MTDiscord <josiah_wi> Seeing that sfan5 has PRd some benchmarks for active objects (thank you, sfan!) it seems like a good time to work on these unit tests as well.
11:43 rubenwardy #14616 seems like it could be merged under the one approval trial
11:43 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14616 -- Add benchmarks for server::ActiveObjectMgr by sfan5
11:52 Lupercus joined #minetest-dev
12:08 sfan5 it could be
12:22 rubenwardy I'm not familiar with the benchmarking library used but it appears to only run the function once in that callback. Shouldn't it run loads of times to get an average? Or does the library do that
13:33 sfan5 the library does that
16:23 Lupercus joined #minetest-dev
17:37 Sharpman joined #minetest-dev
17:50 Eragon_ joined #minetest-dev
17:58 pgimeno sfan5: re https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14611#issuecomment-2094364044 the problem is not the jump range per se, but the failure to allocate memory that is within that range of a couple certain symbols, and that *is* OS-dependent, not just arch-dependent.
20:32 TheCoffeMaker joined #minetest-dev
22:00 sfan5 apparently std::fstream classes only return error information if you enable exceptions and it's also implementation-defined whether there will be anything useful in them
22:00 sfan5 this is terrible, who designed this?
22:19 sfan5 it doesn't even return anything other than "basic_ios::clear: iostream error" on libstdc++
22:33 panwolfram joined #minetest-dev
22:41 imi joined #minetest-dev
23:04 MTDiscord <luatic> just commented on another post on the forums effectively complaining about free not returning (enough) memory to the OS, mislabeling this as a memory leak (https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?p=435760).
23:04 MTDiscord <luatic> should we consider tweaking M_TRIM_THRESHOLD via mallopt? should we perhaps consider a setting to let server admins conveniently tweak it themselves?

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext