IRC log for #minetest-dev, 2020-11-10

Time	Nick	Message
00:05		fluxflux joined #minetest-dev
00:29		fluxflux joined #minetest-dev
01:10		lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev
01:12	lhofhansl	Hi. Does anybody know why there are two separate server-emerge-queue limit for disk and generate? (emergequeue_limit_diskonly, emergequeue_limit_generate)
01:12	lhofhansl	When would I ever set them differently?
01:13	lhofhansl	Also curious to know what people think about #10616
01:13	ShadowBot	https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10616 -- Increase default emerge queue limits and limit enqueue requests for ABMs. by lhofhansl
01:19	lhofhansl	I suppose the two should not compete (generate can take a while), but why would I want to set them to different values?
03:40	lhofhansl	celeron55: do you have an opinion on the emerge enqueu limits?
06:05		lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev
06:27		Icedream joined #minetest-dev
06:46		m42uko joined #minetest-dev
06:59		mizux joined #minetest-dev
07:06		YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev
07:29		m42uko joined #minetest-dev
07:42		calcul0n joined #minetest-dev
08:00		ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev
08:04		Seirdy joined #minetest-dev
08:17		pgimeno joined #minetest-dev
09:17	sfan5	merging #10620 in 5 min
09:17	ShadowBot	https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10620 -- [NO SQUASH] Fix some fallback font issues by sfan5
09:30	sfan5	..
09:49		absurb joined #minetest-dev
10:25		proller joined #minetest-dev
11:00		p_gimeno joined #minetest-dev
11:05		lisac joined #minetest-dev
12:08		Thomas-S joined #minetest-dev
12:08		Thomas-S joined #minetest-dev
13:00		YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev
14:47		Fixer joined #minetest-dev
17:04		m42uko joined #minetest-dev
18:38		lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev
18:58		m42uko joined #minetest-dev
19:53	Krock	will merge #10585 in approx. 10 minutes
19:53	ShadowBot	https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10585 -- ObjectRef: Re-add legacy code for set_physics_override by SmallJoker
19:54		proller joined #minetest-dev
19:54	Krock	#10559 too
19:54	ShadowBot	https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10559 -- Do not set a default for description in itemdef table by Desour
20:02	Krock	merging
20:08	sfan5	can we revert #10419 too or is a fix ready yet?
20:08	ShadowBot	https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10419 -- Replace MyEventReceiver KeyList with std::unordered_set by v-rob
20:12	Krock	#10622
20:12	ShadowBot	https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10622 -- Revert "Replace MyEventReceiver KeyList with std::unordered_set" by SmallJoker
20:16		Icedream joined #minetest-dev
20:52	sfan5	bugfixes, changes are pretty small -> #10623
20:52	ShadowBot	https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10623 -- I did some bugfixes by sfan5
20:53	Krock	title on spot
20:58	sfan5	the commit messages should already close those issues when merged
20:58	sfan5	not sure if that works though
21:00	Krock	Perhaps. The text is underlined, so they might close the issues if it's still mentioned in the squashed commit
21:01	Krock	or merged commits
21:48		proller joined #minetest-dev
22:17		lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev
22:49		Foz joined #minetest-dev

← Previous day | Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | Next day → | Google Search | Plaintext