Time Nick Message 01:12 lhofhansl Hi. Does anybody know why there are two separate server-emerge-queue limit for disk and generate? (emergequeue_limit_diskonly, emergequeue_limit_generate) 01:12 lhofhansl When would I ever set them differently? 01:13 lhofhansl Also curious to know what people think about #10616 01:13 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10616 -- Increase default emerge queue limits and limit enqueue requests for ABMs. by lhofhansl 01:19 lhofhansl I suppose the two should not compete (generate can take a while), but why would I want to set them to *different* values? 03:40 lhofhansl celeron55: do you have an opinion on the emerge enqueu limits? 09:17 sfan5 merging #10620 in 5 min 09:17 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10620 -- [NO SQUASH] Fix some fallback font issues by sfan5 09:30 sfan5 .. 19:53 Krock will merge #10585 in approx. 10 minutes 19:53 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10585 -- ObjectRef: Re-add legacy code for set_physics_override by SmallJoker 19:54 Krock #10559 too 19:54 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10559 -- Do not set a default for description in itemdef table by Desour 20:02 Krock merging 20:08 sfan5 can we revert #10419 too or is a fix ready yet? 20:08 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10419 -- Replace MyEventReceiver KeyList with std::unordered_set by v-rob 20:12 Krock #10622 20:12 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10622 -- Revert "Replace MyEventReceiver KeyList with std::unordered_set" by SmallJoker 20:52 sfan5 bugfixes, changes are pretty small -> #10623 20:52 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10623 -- I did some bugfixes by sfan5 20:53 Krock title on spot 20:58 sfan5 the commit messages should already close those issues when merged 20:58 sfan5 not sure if that works though 21:00 Krock Perhaps. The text is underlined, so they might close the issues if it's still mentioned in the squashed commit 21:01 Krock or merged commits