| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 03:29 |
|
ircSparky joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:21 |
|
Kimapr[m] joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:55 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:05 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:06 |
|
anon5[m]1 joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:09 |
|
ircSparky joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:22 |
|
basxto joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:00 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:22 |
|
NetherEran joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:57 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:43 |
|
NetherEran joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:57 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:30 |
nore |
I think #10451 is ready for testing for those who want, the only missing part of it is tooling for the extraction of strings |
| 10:30 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10451 -- Client-side translations: gettext support by Ekdohibs |
| 10:34 |
|
anon5[m]1 joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:00 |
rubenwardy |
Nice! |
| 11:00 |
rubenwardy |
Merging #10460 in 10 |
| 11:00 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10460 -- Prevent games from setting secure settings by rubenwardy |
| 11:45 |
|
turtleman joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:58 |
|
bootlegbilly joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:00 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:56 |
|
jas_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:09 |
rubenwardy |
Do any core developers have MacOS on mac hardware? |
| 13:51 |
|
calcul0n_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:38 |
|
fluxflux joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:59 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:00 |
|
turtleman joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:03 |
MTDiscord |
<appguru> Might want to revert #10405, it seems to be breaking playeranim & character_anim. |
| 16:03 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10405 -- Fix short 180 degree rotation when using set_bone_position by appgurueu |
| 16:07 |
MTDiscord |
<appguru> It only fixes quite an edge case (setting the bone position of a parent bone but not of it's child bones) anyways and would break fairly popular mods |
| 16:07 |
MTDiscord |
<Lone_Wolf> Not something that can be fixed mod-side? |
| 16:07 |
MTDiscord |
<appguru> I don't think so |
| 16:15 |
sfan5 |
mind opening a PR for that? |
| 17:30 |
|
homthack joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:00 |
|
NetherEran joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:34 |
Krock |
will merge #5680 and #10279 in 15 minutes |
| 18:34 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/5680 -- Add minetest.get_artificial_light and minetest.get_natural_light by HybridDog |
| 18:34 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10279 -- Improve the `fsaa` setting description by Calinou |
| 18:34 |
sfan5 |
ah ninja'd |
| 18:34 |
sfan5 |
I was just looking for PRs I could merge |
| 18:34 |
Krock |
:3 |
| 18:34 |
sfan5 |
you can merge #10453 too |
| 18:34 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10453 -- -Wclass-memaccess only called when GCC > 7 by Zughy |
| 18:35 |
Krock |
alright! |
| 18:48 |
Krock |
merging |
| 18:51 |
Krock |
done. also what's the deal with #10464? This does not improve anything |
| 18:51 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10464 -- Pass ContentFeatures as reference to read_content_features. by JosiahWI |
| 18:52 |
Krock |
it even weakens the control of the ContentFeatures contents |
| 18:53 |
Krock |
and the compiler would likely just re-use the return value without copying - if it's smart enough |
| 19:15 |
|
Seirdy joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:30 |
MTDiscord |
<josiah_wi> It's a minor thing, but making small changes like this will help me get more familiar with the engine code, and if I'm doing these improvements I might as well make a PR. |
| 19:36 |
Krock |
I can see your point. It's a way to get started by trying a few things. Though this function is only called a few times (up to 36000x) on startup, a single return value optimization does not change anything there |
| 19:37 |
sfan5 |
might or might not help but I like the change |
| 19:39 |
Krock |
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ well then |
| 19:41 |
MTDiscord |
<josiah_wi> I understand your point that with optimization turned on this won't change the result of the compilation. This is cleaner code though in my opinion, because it puts the initialization of the resource in the function that deletes it (end of scope in this case) and makes it clearer to someone reading the code. |
| 19:47 |
MTDiscord |
<josiah_wi> You've got my curiosity peaked now; when I have time I'll try compiling both versions with optimization and see what instructions change if any. |
| 20:04 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:23 |
|
fluxflux joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:50 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:24 |
|
dennisjenkins joined #minetest-dev |
