| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:47 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:24 |
|
olliy_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:29 |
|
search_social joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:31 |
|
Ritchie joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:44 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:49 |
|
olliy joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:49 |
|
karamel joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:00 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:13 |
|
Fleckenstein joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:17 |
Fleckenstein |
Hi, i'm currently fixing the entity_speed or God Mode exploit and I'm having a strange problem: The player SAO has an offset from the attachment parent that doesnt seem to have anything to do with the offset passed to ObjectRef:set_attach() |
| 08:18 |
Fleckenstein |
e.g. parent base pos: 404.63 13.5 -2492.91; player base pos: 404.74 14.76 -2489.9; attachment offset: 0 0.42 -1 |
| 08:25 |
|
BuckarooBanzai joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:30 |
|
Seirdy joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:30 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:33 |
|
Seirdy joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:35 |
|
Seirdy joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:05 |
Fleckenstein |
hmm guess i'll have to reverse engineer it |
| 09:21 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:24 |
|
Thomas-S joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:24 |
|
Thomas-S joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:02 |
|
NetherEran joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:10 |
Fleckenstein |
ok forget it i'm stupid |
| 10:20 |
|
absurb joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:36 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:48 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:43 |
|
Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:32 |
|
fluxflux joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:34 |
|
calcul0n_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:39 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:17 |
|
NetherEran joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:11 |
|
tuedel joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:15 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:43 |
|
twoelk joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:45 |
|
Warr1024 joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:04 |
|
wsor4035 joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:29 |
|
pyrollo joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:46 |
|
appguru joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:20 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:44 |
|
fluxflux joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:46 |
|
Warr1024 joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:06 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:13 |
|
Warr1024 joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:27 |
|
indiana joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:28 |
|
Warr1024 joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:31 |
Krock |
will merge #10227 #10338 and #10339 in 15 minutes |
| 19:31 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10227 -- Android: drop simple MainMenu by MoNTE48 |
| 19:31 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10338 -- Open get_texture_mod to lua api by karamel59 |
| 19:32 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/10339 -- Add some details in lua_api for set_texture_mod and select_x_by_camera by karamel59 |
| 19:40 |
v-rob |
I'm debating whether to give the formspec parser access to ITextureSource or not |
| 19:41 |
v-rob |
It's either that or give it to the element creator and to all the elements that need it (the ones using StyleSpec internally, like buttons) |
| 19:42 |
v-rob |
This would also include things like inventory management and item image sourcing |
| 19:43 |
v-rob |
Giving it to the parser would necessitate adding lots more types to ElementSpec |
| 19:46 |
Krock |
merging |
| 19:46 |
v-rob |
Any suggestions? |
| 19:48 |
Krock |
how is ITextureSource related to styles? |
| 19:48 |
v-rob |
bgimg |
| 19:49 |
v-rob |
StyleSpec just stores the texture name |
| 19:51 |
Krock |
that's also what GenericCAO does |
| 19:51 |
Krock |
texture plus modifiers, |
| 19:53 |
v-rob |
Guess that's what I'll do too then |
| 20:10 |
|
fluxflux joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:18 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:10 |
|
twoelk left #minetest-dev |
| 21:54 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:43 |
|
Taoki[laptop] joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:44 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:47 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
