| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 01:02 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:10 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:07 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:42 |
|
ManElevation joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:41 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:15 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:13 |
|
ClobberDX joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:15 |
|
ClobberDX left #minetest-dev |
| 07:05 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:08 |
|
twoelk joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:05 |
|
ensonic joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:39 |
|
RichardTheTurd joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:09 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:26 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:44 |
|
ManElevation joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:15 |
ANAND |
Any of the null_command_handler entries in the *commandTable arrays can be used for new packet types, right? |
| 10:16 |
|
AntumD joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:16 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:22 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:38 |
|
ManElevation joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:49 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:54 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:11 |
|
Lunatrius` joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:29 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:37 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:19 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:29 |
|
ManElevation joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:20 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:56 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:34 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:43 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:00 |
|
Gael-de-Sailly joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:11 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:23 |
ANAND |
Both PlayerSAO and RemotePlayer classes provide getPeerId(). Is there a reason one should be chosen over the other? |
| 15:25 |
Krock |
depends on context. it's the same number anyway in-game |
| 15:26 |
ANAND |
It will be used in script/lua_api/l_object.cpp |
| 15:27 |
|
Corvus_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:28 |
Krock |
PlayerSAO. No need to do the way over RemotePlayer there |
| 15:28 |
ANAND |
Alright, thanks |
| 15:34 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:36 |
ANAND |
Any of the null_command_handler entries in the *commandTable arrays can be used for new packet types, right? |
| 15:37 |
ANAND |
can be replaced by new packet types* |
| 15:39 |
Krock |
yes |
| 15:39 |
ANAND |
Right, thanks again :) |
| 15:39 |
Krock |
null_command_handler discards the packet, so keep that in mind when providing backwards compatbility |
| 15:40 |
Krock |
but well, that's currently not an issue due to what 5.0.0-dev is |
| 15:41 |
ANAND |
Yes, I was about to clarify that... |
| 15:41 |
|
antims joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:42 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:53 |
Krock |
lhofhansl: #7188 |
| 15:53 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7188 -- Do not crash if the world is read only by HybridDog |
| 15:53 |
lhofhansl |
Just found that one. :) |
| 15:54 |
lhofhansl |
That one avoids any client only changes. What I have in mind is that a game can proceed, nodes added/removed/etc. |
| 15:54 |
lhofhansl |
Perhaps I should play around the rollback. |
| 16:03 |
lhofhansl |
I'll file a PR and we can have a discussion there. |
| 16:05 |
Krock |
sounds good :) |
| 16:09 |
lhofhansl |
#7544 |
| 16:09 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7544 -- Allow an optional readonly base database by lhofhansl |
| 16:10 |
lhofhansl |
Just 10 lines or so of changes. |
| 16:11 |
lhofhansl |
Any comments on #7542? |
| 16:11 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7542 -- Reduce block load glitches by lhofhansl |
| 16:11 |
lhofhansl |
Mostly interested in whether this should be configurable or not. |
| 16:12 |
lhofhansl |
Options are nice, but MT has sooo many options already. |
| 16:13 |
sfan5 |
regarding 7542: IMO we don't need an option for this |
| 16:13 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:13 |
lhofhansl |
I tend to agree. I will say that this could potentially load a lot of more blocks from the server (especially in huge underground caverns). |
| 16:14 |
lhofhansl |
To which I will add that huge underground cavern currently suck big time (because not enough blocks are loaded) |
| 16:14 |
lhofhansl |
:) |
| 16:17 |
lhofhansl |
So yeah, this is currently broken and we should make it the default and not configurable. |
| 16:38 |
lhofhansl |
Can anybody explain why we still need the max_simultaneous_block_sends_per_client setting? |
| 16:38 |
lhofhansl |
It defaults to 10, which is way to low, especially when there's latency between the server and client. |
| 16:39 |
lhofhansl |
It seems we should just remove this and let the network be the natural limiter. (I tried that by setting this to 1000, and everything is loading faster with bursts up to 100). |
| 16:48 |
|
ManElevation joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:01 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:35 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:48 |
|
Fritigern joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:59 |
|
Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:07 |
|
Foz joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:10 |
|
Foz1 joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:12 |
|
Foz joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:21 |
|
Amaz joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:30 |
|
Guest25750 joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:34 |
|
jordan4ibanez joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:35 |
|
jordan4ibanez joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:55 |
|
ensonic joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:56 |
|
jordan4ibanez joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:33 |
|
ManElevation joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:40 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:51 |
|
AndroBuilder joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:58 |
|
ManElevation joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:05 |
|
Icedream joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:16 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:21 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:45 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:10 |
|
Player-2 joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:16 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:32 |
ANAND |
{server|client}CommandFactory table has a "channel" field of u8 data-type. What is it and what value should be used for new packets? |
| 23:33 |
sfan5 |
pick whatever all other packets have |
| 23:34 |
ANAND |
Alright, and how about reliable (bool)? Should be true? |
| 23:34 |
sfan5 |
depends on the packet |
| 23:35 |
sfan5 |
but you probably want to set it to true |
| 23:35 |
ANAND |
Ok thanks |
| 23:46 |
|
Icedream joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:50 |
|
lhofhansl joined #minetest-dev |
