Minetest logo

IRC log for #minetest-dev, 2018-06-18

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:25 entuland joined #minetest-dev
00:27 Lia joined #minetest-dev
00:38 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
03:01 AntumD joined #minetest-dev
04:11 YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev
07:04 behalebabo joined #minetest-dev
09:32 Fixer joined #minetest-dev
10:25 entuland joined #minetest-dev
11:29 entuland joined #minetest-dev
11:40 DI3HARD139 joined #minetest-dev
12:06 Beton joined #minetest-dev
12:21 ensonic joined #minetest-dev
12:43 lisac joined #minetest-dev
12:48 lumberJ joined #minetest-dev
13:29 thatgraemeguy joined #minetest-dev
13:29 thatgraemeguy joined #minetest-dev
14:10 Krock joined #minetest-dev
14:27 lisac joined #minetest-dev
15:15 Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev
16:35 Player-2 joined #minetest-dev
16:43 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
16:47 ANAND joined #minetest-dev
16:48 ANAND joined #minetest-dev
16:51 ensonic joined #minetest-dev
17:00 Darcidride joined #minetest-dev
17:02 paramat joined #minetest-dev
17:04 ANAND joined #minetest-dev
17:39 paramat the play store android app is still broken =) should it be removed until fixed?
17:40 rubenwardy probably worth reverting to the older version
17:40 nerzhul joined #minetest-dev
17:41 Krock yes, removing has already been suggested. for now it would be best to revert it to 0.4.16 stable
17:42 Krock ^ nerzhul (speaking of the android apk, plyastore)
17:44 paramat #7439
17:44 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7439 -- Android: Crash while loading singleplayer world
18:40 nerzhul it's not possible to remove it, but i can generate a new 0.4.16 apk if needed
18:40 nerzhul where is the problem, i really don't understand, is this MTG code or MT ?
18:40 nerzhul MT code is correct
18:41 nerzhul and MTG is correct too
18:41 nerzhul is this builtin ?
18:42 nerzhul i just diffed the workspace with both 0.4.17 tags it's exactly the same code
18:53 rubenwardy updated #7454
18:53 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7454 -- Update to new ContentDB API by rubenwardy
18:53 rubenwardy Krock ^
18:54 rubenwardy oh poo
18:54 rubenwardy turns out I made the PR from upstream/contentapi instead of rubenwardy/contentapi
18:55 Krock eh
18:56 rubenwardy #7459
18:56 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7459 -- Contentnewapi by rubenwardy
19:13 rubenwardy merging #7459 in 30
19:13 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7459 -- Contentnewapi by rubenwardy
19:17 Krock assuming 30 minutes
19:18 rubenwardy lol
19:18 rubenwardy nerzhul: I'm thinking on implementing support for offline player meta
19:19 rubenwardy easiest way would be having a map like   std::map<std::string, std::shared_ptr<Metadata>>  in server
19:19 rubenwardy would nice to somehow allow this to be tested
19:19 rubenwardy essentially, the idea is that both  player:get_meta()   and minetest.get_player_meta()   will group a ref_counted pointer to the player meta
19:19 sfan5 s/map/unordered_map/ :)
19:19 rubenwardy sure
19:20 rubenwardy and every save step it'll check to see if any of the metas don't have any more references, which case it'll unload
19:20 rubenwardy just wondering if there's a better class
19:22 rubenwardy well, I'll make a WIP patch for it, it could always be moved later
19:23 rubenwardy later as in before being merged ofc
19:31 rubenwardy argh, this is painful
19:46 Gael-de-Sailly joined #minetest-dev
19:54 paramat joined #minetest-dev
21:13 nerzhul rubenwardy: why a shared_ptr ? the ref will be owned by lua stack ?
21:13 nerzhul if yes, it means you can retain some shared_ptr in lua and trigger anoying memleaks from lua stack when some mods are badly written
21:29 sofar sweet
22:08 entuland joined #minetest-dev
22:36 Amaz joined #minetest-dev
23:11 paramat joined #minetest-dev
23:12 entuland_ joined #minetest-dev

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext