| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:15 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:33 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:35 |
|
swift110-mobile joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:43 |
|
cranez joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:45 |
|
cranez left #minetest-dev |
| 00:50 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:55 |
|
cranez joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:12 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:15 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:50 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:10 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:17 |
|
SFENCE_arch joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:36 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:58 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:17 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:19 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:22 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:32 |
|
Slashcat joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:53 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:20 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:37 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:13 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:31 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:37 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:55 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:15 |
|
sofar joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:25 |
|
sofar joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:57 |
|
hwpplayer1 joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:01 |
|
Slashhcat joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:12 |
|
Lupercus joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:43 |
|
untilted joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:10 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:22 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:43 |
|
hwpplayer1 joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:13 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:32 |
|
untilted joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:47 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:57 |
sfan5 |
5.9.1 soon? |
| 16:02 |
[MatrxMT] |
<grorp> imo we should revert https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/5280863300e88c6e42c320115a53f0957e113589 for 5.9.1 |
| 16:04 |
[MatrxMT] |
<grorp> the commit apparently introduced a very relevant regression and we should fix that regression since we can. it's not very relevant whether the commit the root cause or not. |
| 16:05 |
[MatrxMT] |
<grorp> (#14999) |
| 16:05 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14999 -- minetest 5.9 mapblock flickering depending on camera view |
| 16:07 |
sfan5 |
feel free to |
| 16:09 |
[MatrxMT] |
<grorp> 👍 |
| 16:10 |
MTDiscord |
<bastrabun> Regarding 5.9.1: Are there specific testcases on the remaining issues we should look at? As in "this issue is considered solved if under circumstance A result B is achieved" ? |
| 16:10 |
[MatrxMT] |
<grorp> ("not very relevant" because we have don't know the root cause and have no fix for it) |
| 16:10 |
sfan5 |
grorp: it doesn't revert cleanly however, you might have to check where the calls moved in a follow-up commit |
| 16:11 |
sfan5 |
@bastrabun: #15087 is still an unconfirmed fix. that's it. |
| 16:11 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/15087 -- [no squash] Fix network window size logic by sfan5 |
| 16:16 |
MTDiscord |
<bastrabun> That's what I tried to repro but my setup is insufficient or I'm not smart enough to understand what's expected. What I tested is not what was expected (or there is a general threashold of bandwidth necessary - at some point we may need to acknowledge Minetest requires more than pidgeon carrier ping - at least smoke signal and above) |
| 16:19 |
sfan5 |
ah, right. thanks for testing that anyway. |
| 16:20 |
MTDiscord |
<bastrabun> I just want to prevent people waiting on me. And I if I can I want to test whatever you throw at me. Bring it on 😛 |
| 16:31 |
MTDiscord |
<wsor4035> grorp: reverting the use_texture_alpha commit also fixes it. might be worth having some people other than me test the ci builds ive posted links to |
| 17:02 |
sfan5 |
stars with and without shaders look different: https://0x0.st/Xxms.png vs. https://0x0.st/Xxmz.png |
| 17:03 |
sfan5 |
which one is correct? |
| 17:03 |
sfan5 |
(I know the technical answer but want to fix know in which way this should be fixed) |
| 17:06 |
sfan5 |
s/to fix know/to know/ |
| 17:13 |
MTDiscord |
<warr1024> Is there some kind of brightness/intensity control for stars? |
| 17:14 |
MTDiscord |
<warr1024> If gamedevs can choose how bright they want them to be, then the bottom one should represent maximum brightness. If not, and they only come in one default brightness, then the top one looks saner. |
| 17:15 |
sfan5 |
api allows picking color |
| 17:16 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> i would expect to see exactly the color specified in the API |
| 17:18 |
sfan5 |
if there's an uncontroversial result I can prepare a fix |
| 17:18 |
sfan5 |
if not i'll open an issue |
| 17:20 |
MTDiscord |
<warr1024> "I would expect to see exactly the color" ... doesn't really ever happen anywhere in MT, though, tbh. When I once tried to make a solid-color skybox and then make the fog match it, I had to take a screenshot of the skybox and sample the color from there. |
| 17:32 |
|
Desour joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:46 |
|
Sharpman joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:55 |
sfan5 |
#15143 |
| 17:55 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/15143 -- Star color is incorrect |
| 17:56 |
sfan5 |
I was wrong actually (thought the brighter color is correct) and with context it simply turns out to be a regression |
| 18:01 |
|
Desour joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:26 |
[MatrxMT] |
<Zughy> Is it really a regression if it's 5 versions old? |
| 18:28 |
sfan5 |
yes |
| 18:45 |
MTDiscord |
<warr1024> being 5 versions old just puts you in the unenviable position where the bug is a regression and then the fix is also a regression for other people. |
| 18:47 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> in this case i'm saying fix is fix |
| 18:48 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> this was never a consistent regression, and the API docs are clear about what should happen |
| 18:51 |
sfan5 |
are they? |
| 19:00 |
Krock |
I'd honestly be surprised if the documentation turns out to be 100% clear |
| 19:01 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> well okay |
| 19:01 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> it says this: "star_color: ColorSpec, sets the colors of the stars, alpha channel is used to set overall star brightness. (default: #ebebff69)" |
| 19:01 |
sfan5 |
that is indeed quite clear |
| 19:02 |
Krock |
I assume that fog must be turned off so that this holds true |
| 19:03 |
sfan5 |
would be weird to render the sky with fog applied |
| 19:05 |
Krock |
yes, somewhat. |
| 19:50 |
|
Sokomine joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:52 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:18 |
|
vampirefrog joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:26 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:29 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:59 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:32 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:49 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:23 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:32 |
|
panwolfram joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:42 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:05 |
|
Eragon joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:07 |
|
SFENCE joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:50 |
|
Slashhcatt joined #minetest-dev |
