Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:48 |
|
ShadowBot joined #minetest-dev |
03:18 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
03:34 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
03:39 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
04:20 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
04:28 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
04:40 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
04:51 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
04:59 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
05:15 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
08:22 |
|
Warr1024 joined #minetest-dev |
08:47 |
|
Warr1024 joined #minetest-dev |
09:43 |
sfan5 |
merging #14533, #14541 in 10m |
09:43 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14533 -- Fix 4dir nodebox sometimes not rendering face by Wuzzy2 |
09:43 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14541 -- lua_api: Clarify some environment API functions by sfan5 |
10:32 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
10:34 |
|
cranez joined #minetest-dev |
10:40 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
12:29 |
|
Warr1024 joined #minetest-dev |
12:46 |
|
Lupercus joined #minetest-dev |
15:06 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> it would be meeting time now. should we adjourn? it seems there are not enough core devs who have time, and i should probably also be doing something else right now. |
15:08 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> there was one point from grorp, I don't know |
15:12 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> grorp unfortunately doesn't have time though |
15:12 |
MTDiscord |
<luatic> and me, myself and I discussing grorp's point doesn't make a whole lot of sense ^^ |
15:18 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> alright then |
15:28 |
rubenwardy |
!dev Meetings |
15:28 |
ShadowBot |
Meetings - Minetest Developer Wiki -- http://dev.minetest.net/Meetings |
18:14 |
|
panwolfram joined #minetest-dev |
19:02 |
|
panwolfram joined #minetest-dev |
19:31 |
sfan5 |
regarding grorp's point: I bet there's other fixes that would also make sense in which case we perhaps rather do a proper 5.8.1 |
19:31 |
sfan5 |
...which nobody wants to work on |
20:00 |
[MTMatrix] |
<grorp> sfan5: a non-proper 5.8.1 which still brings some improvements is better than no 5.8.1 at all IMO |
20:01 |
[MTMatrix] |
<grorp> a Play Store / Android only release should be easier to do than a normal patch release, you don't need to build and test on all platforms etc. |
20:02 |
[MTMatrix] |
<grorp> my primary motivation for a patch release isn't be "ship the fixes faster" anyway, it is "get new data" |
20:03 |
sfan5 |
yeah but I'm thinking if you have the overhead of a patch release why not ship all the fixes |
20:03 |
sfan5 |
anyway I'm not again a small android-only 5.8.1, if someone wants to do it |
20:03 |
sfan5 |
against* |
20:04 |
[MTMatrix] |
<grorp> nice, I want to do it. unfortunately I don't have the privileges, so someone else would have to upload to the Play Store. |
20:06 |
sfan5 |
rubenwardy or me should be able to |
20:08 |
[MTMatrix] |
<grorp> 👍️. https://dev.minetest.net/Releasing_Minetest#Signing_APKs_for_the_Play_Store only lists nerzhul and rubenwardy |
20:08 |
sfan5 |
I have access too but actually I don't remember if I have the signing key password |
20:09 |
[MTMatrix] |
<grorp> I have read-only access. |
20:09 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> aren't we getting closer to the 5.9 deadline anyway? |
20:11 |
sfan5 |
maybe |
20:11 |
sfan5 |
but I see some blockers in the milestone that don't look like they're getting solved soon |
20:12 |
[MTMatrix] |
<grorp> maybe we need to prioritize them. "every core dev picks one regression and fixes it until May 1" |
20:13 |
[MTMatrix] |
<grorp> were there so many regressions before previous releases as well, or is the amount something special? |
20:15 |
sfan5 |
might as well not beat around the bush and say that I'm thinking of the inventory regressions |
20:15 |
sfan5 |
🤷 |
20:15 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> it'd also be nice to have the CDB rework for 5.9. I think MT should show that it's actually focusing on graphics |
20:16 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> I think we did a great job with settings in 5.8 |
20:22 |
[MTMatrix] |
<grorp> I agree. settings in 5.8, CDB in 5.9, what's next? |
20:30 |
rubenwardy |
next up on my to do list is the key change menu and the select mods menu |
20:30 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> right now it says that 5.9 is due to May 01. That's definitely unfeasibile |
20:30 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> *unfeasible |
20:30 |
rubenwardy |
5.9 is due for when we finish the SDL work |
20:31 |
rubenwardy |
may 1 is just a placeholder |
20:31 |
|
Desour joined #minetest-dev |
20:31 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> but people might rely on it. Let's move it to June 1? |
20:32 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> that would also allow grorp to go for a 5.8.1 if they want, since 5.9 is not gonna get released anytime soon |
20:38 |
sfan5 |
it would be nice to not delay 5.9 more because there are other important fixes in there |
20:40 |
sfan5 |
one could argue we should release more often in general |
20:47 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> 7 regressions, ouch |
22:32 |
|
panwolfram joined #minetest-dev |
23:17 |
MTDiscord |
<andrey2470t> It would be nice to delay 5.9 before June. I've started refactoring the wield mesh code and adding a new "mesh" HUD element the dual wielding will be based already on that. So, I hope I'll have time to do it during these two months. |
23:36 |
|
Lupercus joined #minetest-dev |
23:48 |
MTDiscord |
<herowl> Considering a feature freeze before release, it's unlikely. But then the May 1 is very unlikely, and (let's get real) a delay beyond June is also possible. |
23:57 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> considering that 5.8 was released December 4, releasing around June 1 it'd be ~6 months after that. I personally think it makes sense as a date, maybe with a feature freeze May 12 (a Sunday, also a meeting day) |