Time |
Nick |
Message |
04:00 |
|
MTDiscord joined #minetest-dev |
04:51 |
|
fluxionary joined #minetest-dev |
05:35 |
|
calcul0n_ joined #minetest-dev |
06:16 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
06:20 |
|
diceLibrarian joined #minetest-dev |
08:05 |
|
calcul0n__ joined #minetest-dev |
10:48 |
|
appguru joined #minetest-dev |
13:05 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> I'd like to merge #13836 for 5.8.0 to avoid the confusion described in the PR with the new settings GUI on Android. |
13:05 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13836 -- Android: Add `field_enter_after_edit[]` formspec element by grorp |
13:06 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> It has the necessary approval, so I guess I'll merge it tomorrow if there are no objections. |
13:06 |
sfan5 |
can we declare that element as "subject to removal at any time" in the docs? |
13:07 |
sfan5 |
so we're not forced to support something that's just a workaround for mobile platforms in the future |
13:07 |
sfan5 |
(assuming a better solution is found) |
13:10 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> Can #13282 be added for 5.8 as well? See my latest comment |
13:10 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13282 -- Remove controls listed in the pause menu (no touchscreen) by Zughy |
13:10 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> (the fact that we can't see the bot messages on Matrix anymore is annoying, every time I have to find the issue/PR manually) |
13:11 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> sfan5: I'll do that, but I'm not sure if there is a better solution. |
13:19 |
rubenwardy |
I feel like that element could apply to desktop too - submitting when the field loses focus |
13:20 |
rubenwardy |
or when it stops changing for x seconds |
13:23 |
rubenwardy |
For #13282 to be merged, I'd like to see "Change Keys" renamed to "Controls" |
13:23 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13282 -- Remove controls listed in the pause menu (no touchscreen) by Zughy |
13:23 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> I'll write "subject to change or removal" then. |
13:23 |
rubenwardy |
the change keys dialog does need a redesign very soon... |
13:24 |
rubenwardy |
"Experimental: subject to change or removal" |
13:24 |
rubenwardy |
experimental is a key term used a lot in the docs already |
13:31 |
rubenwardy |
> I support doing this in the long term, can rename "Change Keys" to "Controls" and show a better interface there. As to whether this is a good idea with Change Keys in its current state is another matter |
14:31 |
|
Desour joined #minetest-dev |
15:40 |
MTDiscord |
<andrey2470t> What about my 3dline PR? Does it have a chance to be re-reviewed/approved by anyone still before the 5.8 feature freeze? |
15:42 |
|
fluxionary joined #minetest-dev |
16:28 |
Desour |
merging #13854 in 10 |
16:28 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13854 -- [NOSQUASH] Split up the internal sound stuff into src/client/sound and add a namespace by Desour |
16:49 |
MTDiscord |
<grorp> Andrey01: I don't think so. |
18:02 |
MTDiscord |
<andrey2470t> Sadly |
18:09 |
MTDiscord |
<andrey2470t> 5.8 could get a still one big feature as there is the only major one in the milestone which is the setting menu redesign and the remain ones are more minor (settings icon button, texture modifiers and physics overrides). |
18:13 |
MTDiscord |
<andrey2470t> And my PR has already been ready long ago and reviewed many times by various members, for now all what necessary is to do a still quick surficial review and mark a still approval and that's all. |
18:16 |
MTDiscord |
<andrey2470t> In any case further improvements will come only through next PRs, I don't intend to add anything anymore here as it is already large |
18:29 |
rubenwardy |
I wonder if there's any interest in participating in hacktoberfest again? They have done a fair amount that should combat the spam, the problem is going to be how beginner friendly we are... issues in "good first issue" are a bit suspect tbh |
18:30 |
rubenwardy |
andrey2470t: I haven't reviewed it as I'd like to see a review from someone that actually knows graphics well, like x2048 |
18:54 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
19:09 |
|
Noisytoot joined #minetest-dev |
20:16 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> rubenwardy: considering there are 1.1k issues, it'd be nice I guess |
20:22 |
[MTMatrix] |
<Zughy> andrey2470t: I think that something big like #13834 might benefit MT more than any other feature, even if I definitely understand your frustration |
20:22 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13834 -- Batched rendering of particles by x2048 |
20:24 |
wsor4035 |
on that note, semi wondering if https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/13834#issuecomment-1741837031 was supposed to be a review, since it reads that way, but 🤷 |
22:32 |
|
panwolfram joined #minetest-dev |
23:13 |
|
Sokomine joined #minetest-dev |