| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:07 |
|
\ joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:23 |
|
jonadab joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:09 |
|
Sokomine joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:10 |
|
Sokomine_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:25 |
|
Sokomine joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:25 |
|
queria joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:39 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:42 |
|
tekakutli joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:35 |
|
specing_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:48 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:48 |
|
Thomas-S joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:04 |
|
queria joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:47 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:07 |
|
\c joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:14 |
|
olliy1or joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:14 |
|
calcul0n_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:23 |
|
specing joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:36 |
sfan5 |
merging #11352 in 10m |
| 12:36 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/11352 -- Rework Settings to support arbitrary hierarchies by sfan5 |
| 13:22 |
sfan5 |
oops |
| 15:10 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:32 |
rubenwardy |
I'm using the "Roadmap: Approval needed" to track PRs that aren't on the roadmap and need a core dev concept approval: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22Roadmap%3A+Needs+approval%22+sort%3Acreated-asc |
| 15:33 |
rubenwardy |
If you support it, and by support I mean you also plan on reviewing it (:D), then you can replace that label with "Supported by core dev" |
| 15:35 |
|
Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:39 |
VanessaE |
has anyone run into an issue where a new LBM doesn't always run on every block of just-loaded (but OLD) terrain, even after changing the LBM's name, if the `run_at_every_load = false` ? I just had to set this to true on one of my mods to force it to do its job.. |
| 15:40 |
VanessaE |
(where by "OLD" I mean it's not newly-emerged, but old stuff that's been in the DB since before the LBM) |
| 15:46 |
VanessaE |
-the |
| 16:08 |
rubenwardy |
merging #11375 in 5 |
| 16:08 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/11375 -- Perform some quality assurance for translation strings by Wuzzy2 |
| 16:34 |
sfan5 |
those are long 5 minutes |
| 16:35 |
Krock |
hey rubenwardy |
| 16:35 |
rubenwardy |
oh right |
| 16:35 |
Krock |
quick jump into the TARDIS |
| 16:35 |
rubenwardy |
we need a bot for this |
| 16:36 |
Krock |
well, there's ShadowBot where a timer plugin could be added |
| 16:39 |
celeron55 |
let's just make an irc bot that operates github so that we don't need to open our web browsers |
| 16:39 |
|
tekakutli joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:39 |
celeron55 |
also who needs text editors, just implement ed in the bot |
| 16:40 |
celeron55 |
it would be an interesting experiment for a smaller collaborative project actually 8) |
| 16:40 |
sfan5 |
how about a bot that writes the code for us? |
| 16:40 |
sfan5 |
it would be the obvious next step |
| 16:42 |
celeron55 |
well, i mean, i can give you a concept approval but you better not ask help making it |
| 16:42 |
Krock |
if I only could find the link to the AI-generated fake source code webpage |
| 16:50 |
Krock |
https://doesnotexist.codes/ |
| 16:50 |
Krock |
sorry it took a while |
| 16:57 |
|
kilbith joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:01 |
kilbith |
I found a critical regression related to item lists |
| 17:05 |
kilbith |
okay that's what I suspected, this commit absolutely needs reverting as it causes regressions: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/2db6b07d |
| 17:06 |
Krock |
kilbith: have you checked today's new PRs yet? |
| 17:06 |
kilbith |
get the i3 mod and try moving items onto the trash slots, or clicking the trash button, or clicking the compress button |
| 17:06 |
kilbith |
* slot |
| 17:06 |
kilbith |
Krock: yes |
| 17:07 |
Krock |
then you know that it's already in the progress of being fixed |
| 17:07 |
kilbith |
ah no I didn't see 11382 |
| 17:09 |
kilbith |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/10788#issuecomment-866410646 |
| 17:09 |
kilbith |
holy shit sfan5 what are you doing |
| 17:09 |
kilbith |
you're much faster on merging your PRs |
| 17:11 |
kilbith |
we have Lars giving support to the best compression algo in the world and none is giving a shit |
| 17:21 |
Krock |
why are we doing double-compression? once for MapNode::deSerializeBulk and again for the node metadata? |
| 17:21 |
Krock |
a mistake in the current design? |
| 17:25 |
sfan5 |
there's no double compression right now |
| 17:25 |
sfan5 |
or do you mean in the PR? |
| 17:26 |
sfan5 |
(though there shouldn't be any there either) |
| 17:27 |
Krock |
first: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/10788/files#diff-958d818edcdc5e6ca5082d092312ddc89aeb2239ccfbdcc6ceb09ca25d3065a6R515 |
| 17:27 |
Krock |
second: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/10788/files#diff-958d818edcdc5e6ca5082d092312ddc89aeb2239ccfbdcc6ceb09ca25d3065a6R533 |
| 17:27 |
Krock |
moment. this seems to be segmented; separate |
| 17:28 |
sfan5 |
yes, there are two compressed streams in current mapblocks |
| 18:21 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:27 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:39 |
|
Guest2 joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:34 |
|
specing_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:39 |
sfan5 |
celeron55: the other PR has this demo video https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17455197/120680769-0226bc00-c49b-11eb-95db-b351aa23c7ba.mp4 |
| 19:39 |
sfan5 |
but on second thought I have no idea if corals actually look like this |
| 21:17 |
|
Extex joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:18 |
|
Extex joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:53 |
|
v-rob joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:30 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:39 |
|
olliy joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:00 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:02 |
|
Alias2 joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:34 |
|
kilbith joined #minetest-dev |
