Minetest logo

IRC log for #minetest-dev, 2019-11-09

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:34 paramat joined #minetest-dev
00:49 proller joined #minetest-dev
01:26 nepugia joined #minetest-dev
02:08 paramat !tell Krock concerning PR 9093, i changed the value to 10 as you suggested
02:08 ShadowBot paramat: O.K.
02:08 paramat merging #9093
02:08 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9093 -- Tunnels: Completely disable generation when 'cave width' >= 10 by paramat
02:51 ssieb joined #minetest-dev
03:01 paramat merging trivial #9095
03:01 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9095 -- Silence invalid Clang Format report by paramat
03:03 paramat see related #9074 , any more opinions?
03:04 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9074 -- Clang Format: Whitelist all files and use in a new way to avoid the problems
03:04 paramat #9016
03:04 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9016 -- Display true/false for states of bools instead of enabled/disabled in 'All Settings' menu
03:07 paramat please can core devs give feedback on issues i open? there are many with little or no feedback, it is odd
03:09 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
03:19 Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev
05:26 Lia joined #minetest-dev
05:39 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
05:49 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
08:38 ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev
08:40 Krock joined #minetest-dev
09:48 Krock joined #minetest-dev
10:05 proller joined #minetest-dev
10:37 nerzhul joined #minetest-dev
10:38 nerzhul hello !
10:38 nerzhul i just pushed the apk v24 (5.1.0 on github). It's not valid on the play store. We need  to have 64b support in the apk now
10:38 nerzhul https://github.com/minetest/minetest/releases/tag/5.1.0
10:38 nerzhul the apk is working well, people who whats to test it can gather it on github
10:38 nerzhul it's just not pusheable yet :D
10:39 Krock at least it's a start. thank you.
10:39 Krock looking forward to a G Play version
10:59 nepugia joined #minetest-dev
11:06 tomraceror joined #minetest-dev
11:13 Fixer joined #minetest-dev
11:16 nerzhul i'm porting a multi arch fix on the build.gradle, build is in progress, will try to push that after
11:29 ensonic joined #minetest-dev
11:35 Krock InvRef:add_item does not respect stack_max >.<
11:39 rubenwardy nerzhul: you pushed to the wrong branch
11:40 rubenwardy Oh nevermind
11:40 rubenwardy You pushed to both
11:46 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
11:47 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
11:48 nerzhul rubenwardy yes, pushed to stable-5 then ported
11:51 nerzhul i just pushed a second fix for 64bit support, but it's not sufficient yet
11:55 nerzhul then we are currently stucked on the deploy on the play store unfortunately
12:20 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
12:36 sfan5 Krock: I think that's on purpoise
12:36 sfan5 -i
12:37 ANAND And it should remain that way, IMHO
12:37 Krock well, handle_node_drops is broken in that case
12:38 sfan5 add_item could have an additional parameter that makes it respect stack size and handle_node_drops could then use that
12:38 Krock opened an issue because I wasn't sure about it anyway
12:38 ANAND IIRC we just recently had an issue for wanting to use add_item to bypass stack_max :)
12:38 sfan5 btw, anyone mind reviewing my CSM pr?
12:38 Krock ANAND: ikr, but I couldn't find it
12:38 Krock sfan5: mods usually add "/logic.lua" after get_modpath(), why is it not needed for CSM?
12:38 Krock looks like the paths are different (tailing DIR_DELIM)
12:39 sfan5 get_modpath returns "modname:" which is also documented that way
12:39 sfan5 would be nice if it worked identically but DIR_DELIM is not ':' so that's not possible
12:39 ANAND Aha, #8519
12:39 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8519 -- Revert e6a9e60 by ClobberXD
12:40 Krock that's a confusing difference
12:40 Krock modname:/lua_file.lua should be valid too in that case
12:40 ANAND Krock: #8518
12:40 Krock i.e. trim first DIR_DELIM if there's any
12:40 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8518 -- Allow exceeding 'stack_max' with '/give(me)'
12:40 Krock thnaks ANAND
12:41 ANAND ;)
12:42 sfan5 I guess it could do that, will look at it later
12:44 Krock ANAND: won't reopen the old issues, but provided a history of "bugfixes" and "bugs"
12:45 ANAND lol
12:45 ANAND Endless cycle of fix and reverts :P
12:45 ANAND > Caused by #8519 which reverted #5774, which itself fixed #5773 which is in conflict to #8518.
12:45 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8519 -- Revert e6a9e60 by ClobberXD
12:45 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/5774 -- Make addItem for empty ItemStacks respect max stack size by nybble41
12:45 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/5773 -- ItemStack::addItem does not enforce stack size limit when ItemStack is empty
12:45 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8518 -- Allow exceeding 'stack_max' with '/give(me)'
12:45 ANAND Uh oh, sorry
12:46 ANAND sfan5's idea of optional param for add_item sounds good to me
12:46 Krock indeed
12:47 tomraceror joined #minetest-dev
12:49 Krock So std::string(size, 0) is the replacement of char[size] and memset()?
12:49 Krock apparently.
13:25 sfan5 yes https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string/basic_string
13:25 sfan5 see constructor (2)
14:07 tomraceror joined #minetest-dev
14:10 Krock sfan5: other than DIR_DELIM and the single comment in the CSM PR there's nothing else. Looks good.
14:11 sfan5 <Krock> modname:/lua_file.lua should be valid too in that case
14:11 sfan5 ^ I'm about to push a commit for this
14:11 Krock great :)
14:12 Krock I'm aware about the second constructor. Just wondered whether that's the C++ way of doing it. Answered my question, though.
14:15 sfan5 using an automatically managed string instead of manually managed memory is certainly more C++-like
14:17 sfan5 PR updated
14:26 tomraceror joined #minetest-dev
14:37 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
14:53 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
15:03 sfan5 merging #9092 in 5 minutes
15:03 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9092 -- Some CSM changes by sfan5
15:12 Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev
16:32 tomraceror joined #minetest-dev
16:35 ensonic joined #minetest-dev
17:01 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
17:20 troller joined #minetest-dev
17:29 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
17:39 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
17:42 nepugia joined #minetest-dev
17:54 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
17:56 tomraceror joined #minetest-dev
18:08 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
18:11 Amaz joined #minetest-dev
18:43 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
18:51 ensonic joined #minetest-dev
19:17 paramat joined #minetest-dev
19:19 paramat i will merge trivial #9094 in 4 hours
19:19 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9094 -- Randomwalk caves: Extend beyond mapchunk vertically also by paramat
19:27 ensonic joined #minetest-dev
19:33 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
19:48 Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev
19:51 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
19:52 Lia joined #minetest-dev
20:07 Krock thanks paramat. those issues were not that popular so it's probably best to close them until someone insists on reopening
20:12 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
20:25 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
20:44 NoctisLabs joined #minetest-dev
20:58 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
21:43 Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev
22:35 Icedream joined #minetest-dev
22:57 realz joined #minetest-dev
23:13 longerstaff13 joined #minetest-dev
23:17 nepugia joined #minetest-dev
23:32 longerstaff13 joined #minetest-dev

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext