Time |
Nick |
Message |
00:01 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
00:29 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
00:54 |
|
p_gimeno joined #minetest-dev |
01:25 |
|
kaeza joined #minetest-dev |
01:32 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
01:34 |
paramat |
well, first i'll bisect to confirm if it is that commit |
01:57 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
02:00 |
p_gimeno |
it's faster to check that commit and the one before :) |
02:08 |
paramat |
heh, yes that's what i'm doing :) |
02:09 |
paramat |
bisecting from a range of 2 commits |
02:11 |
p_gimeno |
lol |
02:16 |
|
benrob0329 joined #minetest-dev |
02:21 |
|
kaeza joined #minetest-dev |
02:26 |
paramat |
confirmed the cause is the suspected commit, i might attempt a revert PR |
02:30 |
paramat |
doing that now |
03:08 |
paramat |
not too bad. done #8288 |
03:08 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8288 -- Revert CSM particles commit to fix bug for 5.0.0 by paramat |
03:39 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
03:58 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
04:17 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
04:24 |
paramat |
merging #8288 build fails are due to translation thingy |
04:24 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8288 -- Revert CSM particles commit to fix bug for 5.0.0 by paramat |
04:32 |
paramat |
nerzhul (for when you are around) are you able to help with #8284 ? |
04:32 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8284 -- Can’t compile due to weblate, translation issue |
04:33 |
ANAND |
paramat: Updated #8260 with your suggestion |
04:33 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8260 -- README: Remove references to Minecraft and InfiniMiner by ClobberXD |
04:35 |
paramat |
ok |
05:02 |
|
lumberJ joined #minetest-dev |
05:34 |
|
benrob0329 joined #minetest-dev |
06:02 |
|
GreenDimond_ joined #minetest-dev |
06:03 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
07:23 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
07:31 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
07:37 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
07:53 |
nerzhul |
seriously |
07:54 |
nerzhul |
01cd63bd3bca0192dab2834faf414b022706a77e is unacceptable. |
07:54 |
nerzhul |
re commiting. We should find a fix. |
07:54 |
nerzhul |
it should not be difficult to find the problem the client part is not very difficult to understand |
07:54 |
nerzhul |
the problem is in that part |
07:59 |
|
Unarelith joined #minetest-dev |
08:41 |
|
Unarelith_ joined #minetest-dev |
08:58 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
09:05 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
09:06 |
nerzhul |
the PR fix #8289 |
09:06 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8289 -- Fix particle spawners not visible since CSM spawner implementation by nerzhul |
09:07 |
nerzhul |
this is the real way to fix it. |
09:07 |
nerzhul |
dropping a whole feature is not the solution when the problem is just the registration of a id... |
09:11 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
09:30 |
|
rocky1138 joined #minetest-dev |
09:44 |
|
Ritchie joined #minetest-dev |
09:59 |
|
Beton joined #minetest-dev |
11:47 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
11:53 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
12:01 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
12:26 |
|
Unarelith_ joined #minetest-dev |
12:26 |
|
Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev |
12:27 |
|
xerox123_4 joined #minetest-dev |
12:28 |
|
ANAND_ joined #minetest-dev |
12:28 |
|
cheapie_ joined #minetest-dev |
12:29 |
|
fluxflux_ joined #minetest-dev |
12:29 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
12:31 |
|
Lunatrius joined #minetest-dev |
12:32 |
|
bobby joined #minetest-dev |
12:39 |
|
Lia joined #minetest-dev |
12:41 |
|
Unarelith__ joined #minetest-dev |
13:02 |
|
T4im joined #minetest-dev |
13:26 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
13:29 |
|
Unarelith__ joined #minetest-dev |
13:32 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
14:16 |
|
Unarelith joined #minetest-dev |
14:31 |
|
kaeptmblaubaer joined #minetest-dev |
15:02 |
jas_ |
i would agree, if i were in a position to |
15:20 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
15:45 |
|
p_gimeno joined #minetest-dev |
15:46 |
|
p_gimeno joined #minetest-dev |
16:04 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
16:14 |
|
entuland joined #minetest-dev |
16:42 |
|
ANAND_ joined #minetest-dev |
16:50 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
17:40 |
|
benrob0329 joined #minetest-dev |
18:13 |
|
Lone-Star joined #minetest-dev |
18:15 |
|
Beton joined #minetest-dev |
18:24 |
|
Lone-Star joined #minetest-dev |
19:09 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
19:09 |
ANAND |
#8034 is no longer WIP, and is ready for testing and review |
19:10 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8034 -- Disable auto-setting server as favorite on connect; display "Add Favorite" button by ClobberXD |
19:17 |
|
ANAND_ joined #minetest-dev |
19:18 |
|
entuland_ joined #minetest-dev |
19:21 |
|
Lunatrius joined #minetest-dev |
19:22 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
19:30 |
|
fwhcat joined #minetest-dev |
19:47 |
|
ichoquo0Aigh9ie joined #minetest-dev |
19:50 |
|
xerox123_ joined #minetest-dev |
20:07 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
20:17 |
|
ichoquo0Aigh9ie joined #minetest-dev |
20:24 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
20:27 |
paramat |
nerzhul reverting a commit by yourself is not acceptable, especially at the 'We should find a fix.' stage. the first revert should stay until your PR is tested |
20:28 |
paramat |
we are very close to a release, your fix may cause unforseen issues, the safest solution is a revert, then you can make your fix after release. the feature is not important and CSM is unfinished |
20:29 |
|
reductum joined #minetest-dev |
20:31 |
paramat |
we have reverted a few other things that caused bugs, due to doing this being the least risky solution, this situation is no different |
20:32 |
paramat |
you could have based your PR on the reverted code, it would have been no more difficult, then the revert would have been a backup solution |
20:33 |
paramat |
i will recommit the initial revert then you can rebase your PR |
20:33 |
VanessaE |
paramat: so you want to revert the reverted revert? |
20:35 |
|
Sokomine joined #minetest-dev |
20:37 |
paramat |
but anyway, we all make impulsive mistakes, i hope you admit your mistake and apologise ;) |
20:38 |
paramat |
sfan5 could you look at nerz's PR? i remember you considered a proper fix non trivial |
20:39 |
sfan5 |
that was a guess |
20:39 |
sfan5 |
but sure |
20:45 |
paramat |
heh yes |
20:46 |
paramat |
i'm concerned this is too risky and we won't have enough time to test. 5.1.0 will likely be soon after so the proper fix won't be far off. ugh |
20:47 |
sfan5 |
not every code is buggy, I don't think risk is a concern here |
20:47 |
p_gimeno |
even 5.0.1 |
20:59 |
paramat |
i'm not saying the PR is buggy, but we have decided several times recently to apply the low risk solution due to how close release is, this is no different. so yes risk is a huge concern at this stage, obviously |
21:12 |
paramat |
but, i won't revert yet, as that would then break this latest PR, even though we 'should' |
21:27 |
|
Icedream joined #minetest-dev |
21:41 |
paramat |
should a build warning be considered a blocker? #8292 i'll make a PR |
21:41 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8292 -- Warning about “writing to an object of type 'struct NoiseParams' with no trivial copy-assignment” in file src/noise.cpp when compiling |
21:54 |
paramat |
i can fix one warning but have no idea about this one #8291 |
21:54 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/8291 -- Warning about out-of-bounds offset in src/util/srp.cpp when compiling |
21:58 |
paramat |
hm suddenly lots of blockers, i can see release slipping another week |
22:07 |
nerzhul |
test my pr. |
22:08 |
nerzhul |
it's just working and restoring the behaviour you got by reverting the feature PR. |
22:08 |
nerzhul |
build warning are not intended to be blocker paramat |
22:10 |
nerzhul |
i just registered particlespawner properly. the problem in the original pr is the mapper between server & client ids |
22:11 |
nerzhul |
it's a wrong idea due to another code part which requires that ID but doesn't know about it. i just merged the two behaviour by using a uint64 with lower values (u32) for server part, like before, and upper parts for client ids |
22:23 |
paramat |
it's mostly your responsibility to thoroughly test it, since you are promoting a risky situation. understandably i don't much feel like testing it |
22:25 |
paramat |
and yes i somewhat agree a warning is not a blocker, removing labels ... |
22:58 |
|
Unarelith_ joined #minetest-dev |
23:29 |
|
entuland_ joined #minetest-dev |
23:36 |
|
GreenDimond joined #minetest-dev |
23:50 |
|
benrob0329 joined #minetest-dev |