Time |
Nick |
Message |
01:39 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
03:20 |
|
Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev |
04:44 |
jas_ |
#4256 |
04:44 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/4256 -- Fade and sound playback with gain <= 0 delete the handle (for mute) |
04:44 |
jas_ |
i will continue testing as im not 100 percent sure |
04:45 |
jas_ |
but still, minetest.fade isnt suitable for (un)muting |
08:32 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
08:47 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
09:14 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
09:27 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
09:58 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
10:28 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
10:34 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
10:39 |
|
Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev |
11:17 |
|
Lunatrius joined #minetest-dev |
11:25 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
11:25 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
11:25 |
|
Gael-de-Sailly joined #minetest-dev |
11:37 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
11:40 |
|
proller__ joined #minetest-dev |
11:44 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
11:57 |
|
troller joined #minetest-dev |
12:10 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
12:42 |
|
T4im joined #minetest-dev |
12:51 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
13:14 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
13:22 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
13:30 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
13:42 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
14:09 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
14:32 |
|
Jordach joined #minetest-dev |
15:23 |
|
Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev |
16:17 |
|
Gael-de-Sailly joined #minetest-dev |
16:21 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
16:45 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
17:28 |
paramat |
some android PRs are coming in attending to the blockers, please review |
17:34 |
* VanessaE |
growls at paramat |
17:39 |
paramat |
can anyone help with this " I would like to verify that NDEBUG is in fact present for release builds. It should be, otherwise something else is wrong but this still needs to be verified." https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7525#issuecomment-435605854 |
17:40 |
p_gimeno |
hmm... add "assert(false);" at the top of main() and see? |
17:41 |
p_gimeno |
or even #ifndef NDEBUG \n # error NDEBUG not set \n #endif |
17:42 |
sfan5 |
#error something is definitely the easiest way |
17:45 |
rubenwardy |
That's not a fix, that's hiding the problem |
17:45 |
rubenwardy |
Please only merge that into backport |
17:45 |
paramat |
i know :) but no-one is coding the fix |
17:45 |
paramat |
and it can be done later |
17:47 |
rubenwardy |
It won't be done later |
17:48 |
rubenwardy |
Well fine, add it to the list of graphics issues |
17:51 |
paramat |
hm, it's certainly better to fix it properly, i'm just concerned that won't get done. that issue has gone nowhere for months. well, at least the fix can be backported if done |
18:32 |
Krock |
!tell paramat Where's the second disapproval? https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7833#issuecomment-435609366 |
18:32 |
ShadowBot |
Krock: O.K. |
18:33 |
Krock |
!tell paramat If you think that were me - the code only needs a few changes, it's not a PR disapprobal |
18:33 |
ShadowBot |
Krock: O.K. |
18:38 |
VanessaE |
whoa whoa whoa |
18:38 |
VanessaE |
I'm sorry, now I gotta say something |
18:39 |
VanessaE |
paramat: that last reply was just plain unacceptable |
18:41 |
sfan5 |
"Neglect closure" a day after the PR was proposed |
18:41 |
sfan5 |
wew |
18:44 |
Krock |
wew indeed. wrote a statement |
18:47 |
p_gimeno |
looks like paramat is pissed of based on his previous experience with this guy, kind of understandable but maybe he should just recuse himself from participating in these |
18:47 |
VanessaE |
tenplus1 has been a decent, well-meaning contrib to this project for a while now. |
18:48 |
VanessaE |
to chase him off just.... I have no words. |
18:54 |
|
Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev |
19:04 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
19:10 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
19:31 |
|
epoch_ joined #minetest-dev |
20:33 |
|
Jordach joined #minetest-dev |
21:36 |
crazyR |
I dont know more than what ive read in that PR... but from reading that PR... seems personal opinion of the author has impaired paramats judgment in that particular PR. Regardless of history between 2 people. as a reviewer paramat should be impartial when reviewing.. *just my 2 cents |
21:36 |
crazyR |
*each pr should be judged on its own merit i think i ment to say |
21:40 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest-dev |
21:41 |
paramat |
nope, my review of that PR and my requests would have been identical whoever wrote it and however they behaved. the other stuff about behaviour is independent |
21:43 |
paramat |
putting irritation aside, here are the remaining issues https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7833#issuecomment-435616837 |
21:44 |
paramat |
those 5 issues are valid |
21:45 |
VanessaE |
paramat: I'm sorry, but just no. I think you crossed the line. or to put it another way... had you made those comments to me, I'd have walked away too, and you know how persistent I can be. |
21:49 |
paramat |
you haven't been reviewing his PRs over the last few years though, |
21:49 |
VanessaE |
no, I have not. but I have seen the results of his efforts. |
21:57 |
paramat |
so you don't know that i am actually stating the truth about his behaviour :) |
21:57 |
VanessaE |
... |
21:58 |
sfan5 |
"my review of that PR and my requests would have been identical whoever wrote it" / "you haven't been reviewing his PRs over the last few years though" |
21:58 |
VanessaE |
stating the truth, you may be, but you still went way too far., |
21:58 |
sfan5 |
isn't that a direction contraction |
21:58 |
sfan5 |
contradiction* |
22:01 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
22:07 |
paramat |
i see no contradiction, but nevermind :) vanessa i was quite restrained actually, no personal insults, fairly civil |
22:07 |
* VanessaE |
shrugs |
22:09 |
paramat |
anyway, closing it was wrong, i was irritated. this is what years of uncooperative behaviour and trying to tolerate it does |
22:10 |
paramat |
not just me, so-far was also irritated by his contribution behaviour a few years back |
22:12 |
|
Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev |
22:13 |
VanessaE |
you're missing a crucial point: it isn't just one message I'm talking about, it's the whole barrage. 6 in a row, AFTER he walked away and closed? |
22:14 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest-dev |
22:14 |
|
Jordach joined #minetest-dev |
22:19 |
paramat |
read the comments after his close. the first deals with my irritation, the rest are not rants and are technical points |
22:19 |
VanessaE |
I did. |
22:19 |
VanessaE |
you repeated yourseld. |
22:19 |
VanessaE |
f* |
22:19 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
22:20 |
paramat |
in the first comment only, not 6 |
22:20 |
VanessaE |
yse yse, but you simply did NOT need to reply at all. |
22:20 |
VanessaE |
yes** |
22:20 |
paramat |
it's unhealthy to bottle in deep irritation, that's what caused this in the first place :) |
22:23 |
sofar |
I may have been irritated in the past with tenplus1, but honestly at this point I'd try and focus on cooperation as much as possible |
22:23 |
sofar |
identify acceptable and wanted elements in a PR, work on a solution together etc. |
22:23 |
paramat |
yeah |
22:23 |
sofar |
( I didnt read the thread ) |
22:23 |
VanessaE |
you want to vent irritation, go find a punching bag. |
22:23 |
paramat |
see my later comments |
22:25 |
paramat |
nah, if someone is extremely difficult, they need to be told, as long as it's reasonably civil |
22:25 |
sofar |
my preference is always to leave PRs open until the desired outcome is reached |
22:26 |
sofar |
closed PRs means submitters are no longer attached and will just vaporize |
22:26 |
paramat |
yes, my mistake |
22:26 |
sofar |
I've made so many mistakes myself :) |
22:27 |
sofar |
I just replied to a forum thread earlier today, for instance! |
22:27 |
sofar |
XD |
22:30 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
22:47 |
sofar |
can I be honest? that PR is a disaster to begin with |
22:48 |
sofar |
I'm reading the code and 50 lines changed while 3 lines of functionality are the actual core of the change |
22:48 |
sofar |
and half of that isn't even properly mentioned in the summary |
22:49 |
sofar |
PR's that start with "rewrite X" and "to fix Y" are pure garbage to begin with |
22:49 |
sofar |
if Y needs fixing, submit a fix to Y, and don't pull in 30+ lines of rewrite with it |
22:49 |
sofar |
[/rant] |
22:50 |
sofar |
"honey I fixed the plumbing!" -> house burnt down |
22:54 |
paramat |
yeah, the bugfix needs to be separate, as i requested :) |
22:56 |
paramat |
also the bug isn't explained and there isn't a link to an issue, so we don't really know what is being fixed and what changes attend to the bug |
22:57 |
paramat |
but i'm going to try to extract any useful bugfix (if there is one) out of this |
23:02 |
paramat |
i think he redoes code for his own use, then gets butthurt when we point out the mistakes and how it's wrong for MT, so then ignores some issues, won't answer questions, the usual behaviour as before :) |
23:16 |
paramat |
the really irritating behaviour is the 'going silent' on an issue or a question, would much prefer he refuses, or argues :) |
23:19 |
|
Jordach joined #minetest-dev |
23:23 |
crazyR |
unless there is some other convo that i've not been privy too... i dont see how he got but hurt... no bodt is telling you that your "opinion/points" are wrong regarding the PR.... simply the way you handled it. I think... thats my impression anyhow |
23:24 |
|
epoch joined #minetest-dev |
23:25 |
crazyR |
any how, its late im going spending some time with the missus, i hope you guys can resolve your diffrences.... it never ends well when contributers and devs fall out |
23:37 |
paramat |
well ... you wrote above: "I dont know more than what ive read in that PR.", and i'm referring to the history of his behaviour in my 'butthurt' comment. tenplus can resolve this by being more cooperative, i would welcome that |
23:41 |
paramat |
your judgement is actually very limited if you know very little about the topic. if you knew more you might somewhat sympathise with me and understand how irritating it is :) |