| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:11 |
|
Jordach joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:59 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:43 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:02 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:56 |
|
CBugDCoder joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:19 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:32 |
|
DI3HARD139 joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:40 |
|
Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:47 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 03:57 |
|
Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev |
| 05:55 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:19 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:04 |
|
Lymkwi joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:14 |
|
twoelk joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:06 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:16 |
|
CBugDCoder joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:56 |
|
Jordach joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:18 |
|
ANAND joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:48 |
|
Jordach joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:56 |
|
Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:28 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:01 |
|
Lia joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:06 |
|
Jordach joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:08 |
|
Xio joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:38 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:38 |
|
Jordach joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:41 |
|
YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
Darcidride joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:05 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:52 |
|
Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:57 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:59 |
paramat |
hm so many of the blockers for release are android issues or PRs. it seems to take up a disproportionate amount of time and effort |
| 18:00 |
paramat |
but it seems we should at least get it working for release |
| 18:03 |
paramat |
any more thoughts on #7569 ? |
| 18:03 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7569 -- Send custom floats (log2) by SmallJoker |
| 18:07 |
paramat |
also #7395 will need processing before release, i intend to test that |
| 18:07 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7395 -- Add Lua methods 'set_rotation()' and 'get_rotation()' by CoderForTheBetter |
| 18:08 |
paramat |
nerzhul if you can look at #7483 sometime that would be great, just needs 1 more approval |
| 18:08 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7483 -- Move touchscreen input handling to base GUIModalMenu class by stujones11 |
| 18:35 |
nerzhul |
paramat i open the tab |
| 19:06 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:07 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:17 |
paramat |
thanks for reviewing |
| 19:24 |
paramat |
although the author is not very happy :3 |
| 19:26 |
paramat |
*sigh* i know we probably shouldn't but it would be a relief to completely drop android support =/ maybe we can't fix it before 5.0.0 |
| 19:26 |
paramat |
although that would be rather embarassing |
| 19:27 |
paramat |
we also need to deal with #7525 and #7672 |
| 19:27 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7525 -- GL_INVALID_ENUM on Android |
| 19:27 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7672 -- Android App crashes on start with `SettingNotFoundException: Setting [TMPFolder] not found.` |
| 19:33 |
paramat |
well, i'm going to remove 'blocker' from all android issues and PRs. maybe they'll get fixed but i don't think it's worth them delaying a release, otherwise it will be many months |
| 19:34 |
VanessaE |
um |
| 19:34 |
paramat |
and dev is too slow |
| 19:34 |
VanessaE |
bad idea... |
| 19:35 |
VanessaE |
75% of MT players are on mobiles... |
| 19:37 |
rubenwardy |
no |
| 19:37 |
paramat |
i know :) |
| 19:37 |
rubenwardy |
don't do that |
| 19:38 |
rubenwardy |
well |
| 19:38 |
rubenwardy |
remove the less important ones |
| 19:38 |
rubenwardy |
but not the big crashes and such |
| 19:38 |
rubenwardy |
*at most remove |
| 19:38 |
Shara |
Should just assess whether a thing really is a blocker to a release or not |
| 19:38 |
rubenwardy |
although this is a release to get right on mobile :) |
| 19:38 |
paramat |
well we either need to attend to them or not let them block |
| 19:38 |
rubenwardy |
yeah |
| 19:38 |
Shara |
Some of those android issues seem pretty bad... |
| 19:39 |
paramat |
they can still be labelled high priority |
| 19:39 |
Shara |
paramat: if they are serious issues, they should still be blockers |
| 19:40 |
paramat |
i want android fixed for 5.0.0 too but at this dev rate it will be a struggle to attend to just the non-android blockers |
| 19:40 |
paramat |
well, i sort of agree with you but .. |
| 19:42 |
Shara |
paramat: seriously #7122 should be a blocker |
| 19:42 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7122 -- Android: confirmation dialog is... unreable and crashes |
| 19:42 |
Shara |
That's a new feature for 5.0 (a terrible one in my opinion but whatever) and will stop android users knowing how to join servers |
| 19:42 |
paramat |
ok, i'll let others add the labels and won't argue |
| 19:45 |
paramat |
however, we need core devs to actually attend to these issues, i would do it if i was able but much of this android stuff is beyond my expertise :/ |
| 19:46 |
Shara |
Then in the case of 7122, if it can't be fixed, the "feature" needs to be removed, at least for android |
| 19:47 |
paramat |
if core dev time is near-zero then that can't block a release only due to android. very few use the official app and it's always very broken anyway, so i can't see much loss, hmmm |
| 19:49 |
Shara |
I guess it's another release with more new bugs for lots of users then. |
| 19:52 |
paramat |
well, hopefully not, i hope they get attended to |
| 19:52 |
VanessaE |
paramat: why's dev so slow lately? |
| 19:53 |
paramat |
ok, i'll re-add the blocker labels =s |
| 19:53 |
paramat |
lol |
| 19:53 |
VanessaE |
"at this dev rate" implies that you think things are going too slow.. |
| 19:54 |
paramat |
it's got nothing to do with me, ask the others :) |
| 19:55 |
paramat |
apart from krock who is my hero |
| 19:57 |
VanessaE |
I was probing for your opinion :) |
| 19:59 |
paramat |
no idea, i guess people are busy, understandable |
| 19:59 |
paramat |
blocker labels re-added, you were right, i was just irritated |
| 20:01 |
paramat |
also Shara has been active recently i must add, much appreciated |
| 20:19 |
rubenwardy |
having both blocker and high priority is silly |
| 20:19 |
rubenwardy |
blocker is a priority above high priority |
| 20:19 |
sfan5 |
supposedly blocker issues are ones that definitely need to be solved |
| 20:19 |
sfan5 |
the same often (if not always) applies to high prio issues too |
| 20:24 |
paramat |
hm |
| 20:25 |
paramat |
it seems the distinction makes some sense, in that we need a label for something that specifically must be done before a release, that is not necessarily identical to high priority. but i see what you mean |
| 20:26 |
paramat |
for example, particle performance is high priority but doesn't need fixing before release |
| 20:28 |
paramat |
oh but, blocker obviously means high prioriy, yeah :3 |
| 21:06 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:15 |
rubenwardy |
oh nice! |
| 21:15 |
rubenwardy |
2 new GH feature on a comment: |
| 21:15 |
rubenwardy |
the ability to quote it |
| 21:15 |
paramat |
actually, no, because of results when filtering by 'high priority' =s |
| 21:15 |
rubenwardy |
and the ability to open a new issue with its contents |
| 21:15 |
rubenwardy |
is there an inclusive OR? |
| 21:16 |
rubenwardy |
really this should be a field |
| 21:16 |
rubenwardy |
rather than a label |
| 21:16 |
paramat |
oh yeah |
| 21:16 |
rubenwardy |
it would have a numeric value then, and you could do "high priority or above" |
| 21:16 |
rubenwardy |
but alias |
| 21:50 |
|
BakerPrime joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:53 |
|
Cornelia joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:50 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest-dev |
