| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:04 |
|
diemartin joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:06 |
|
shadowzone joined #minetest-dev |
| 00:48 |
|
shadowzone joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:30 |
|
kahrl joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:31 |
kahrl |
ShadowNinja: lua_pop(L, -1) should clear the stack if I read the implementation right |
| 01:32 |
kahrl |
but that's probably an implementation detail, the documented way to do that is lua_settop(L, 0) |
| 02:14 |
|
darkrose joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:14 |
|
zat joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:17 |
|
Zeno` joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:24 |
Zeno` |
hi kahrl, thanks for the comments |
| 02:24 |
Zeno` |
I don't understand the line comment for line 453 regarding the \\\\; |
| 02:27 |
ShadowNinja |
kahrl: That could actually be the source of the bug then, over-poping produces obscure segfaults in Lua. Where'd you read that? I've only seen it as "Effectively #define lua_pop(l, n) lua_settop(l, lua_gettop(l) - n)" |
| 02:33 |
Zeno` |
This is what I mentioned the other night |
| 03:08 |
|
MikeFair joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:33 |
|
Miner_48er joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:44 |
|
Hunterz joined #minetest-dev |
| 06:46 |
|
zat joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:06 |
|
nore joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:10 |
|
sol_invictus joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:13 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:18 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:38 |
kahrl |
Zeno`: that comment (for line 453) isn't relevant anymore |
| 07:39 |
Zeno` |
I took it away |
| 07:39 |
kahrl |
ShadowNinja: it's in lua.h: #define lua_pop(L,n) lua_settop(L, -(n)-1) |
| 07:39 |
Zeno` |
Can't remember but I think I meant to type unescape... not sure (just took it away) |
| 07:39 |
kahrl |
Zeno`: ah |
| 07:40 |
|
Miner_48er joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:40 |
kahrl |
ShadowNinja: so with n==-1 that evaluates to lua_settop(L, 0) |
| 07:49 |
|
ImQ009 joined #minetest-dev |
| 07:52 |
|
GrimKriegor joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:05 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:48 |
|
daswort joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:57 |
|
zat joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:16 |
|
zat joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:21 |
|
nore joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:49 |
|
FR^2 joined #minetest-dev |
| 09:55 |
|
ImQ009 joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:30 |
|
jin_xi joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:57 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:11 |
|
Amaz joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:19 |
|
iqualfragile joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:59 |
|
iqualfragile joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:17 |
|
iqualfragile_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:18 |
Zeno` |
hmm |
| 12:24 |
|
Amaz joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:25 |
|
kaeza joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:49 |
|
iqualfragile joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:52 |
|
kilbith joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:56 |
|
shadowzone joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:32 |
|
zat joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:33 |
|
iqualfragile_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:44 |
|
exio4_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:49 |
|
Gethiox joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:50 |
|
Gethiox joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:55 |
|
casimir joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:01 |
|
exio4_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:02 |
|
ImQ009 joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:21 |
|
UnknownSentinel joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:27 |
|
hmmmm joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:59 |
|
shadowzone joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:03 |
|
Gethiox joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:22 |
|
jin_xi joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:30 |
|
MikeFair joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:31 |
|
jin_xi joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:59 |
|
CraigyDavi joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:08 |
|
Megaf joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:17 |
|
Calinou joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:28 |
|
zat joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:43 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:44 |
|
Hunterz joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:46 |
|
kilbith joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:59 |
kahrl |
sfan5: weblate 2.0 was just released, should we try it out? |
| 17:00 |
|
PenguinDad joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:03 |
sfan5 |
kahrl: is it easier to install? |
| 17:03 |
kahrl |
dunno |
| 17:04 |
kahrl |
haven't tried it yet, hence why I asked :) |
| 17:05 |
kahrl |
but it supports django 1.7 out of the box so maybe some of the old bugs have vanished |
| 17:10 |
Calinou |
happy trolling, sfan5 |
| 17:10 |
Calinou |
“Does it still remove the running kernel?†|
| 17:10 |
Calinou |
here's a question you can ask to the developers |
| 17:11 |
sfan5 |
what? |
| 17:16 |
|
MinetestForFun joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:17 |
MinetestForFun |
Hi everybody, somenone can inform me about the version of the protocol of minetest between 0.4.10-stable and the latest 0.4.10-dev release ? i need to know if the protocol have changed between this two version... thank you :) |
| 17:22 |
|
Krock joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:34 |
|
selat joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:47 |
|
Hunterz joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:52 |
OldCoder |
Here is a clue to MT network problems: |
| 17:52 |
OldCoder |
https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?id=5026 |
| 17:52 |
OldCoder |
This mod causes Kindle Fires, some, to time out every time |
| 17:53 |
OldCoder |
But not regular PCs |
| 17:55 |
PenguinDad |
OldCoder: maybe because of the models? |
| 17:56 |
PenguinDad |
*model |
| 17:57 |
OldCoder |
Unusual models have different effects, then? |
| 17:58 |
OldCoder |
Makes sense, I guess. But lockout occurs at media load time. Is this consistent? |
| 17:58 |
PenguinDad |
No I was thinking about the size of the model |
| 17:58 |
OldCoder |
Reviewing |
| 17:58 |
OldCoder |
I deleted it; how large is it? |
| 18:00 |
PenguinDad |
About 600 kb :/ |
| 18:03 |
Krock |
kinda big |
| 18:04 |
PenguinDad |
using a binary model format might fix it |
| 18:13 |
OldCoder |
We don't especially need it. But apparently 0.5MB models can't be loaded even with large timeouts. |
| 18:13 |
OldCoder |
I set timeouts to 5 seconds as an experiment; no dice |
| 18:13 |
OldCoder |
Thank you for the comments. This would appear to be the explanation. |
| 18:13 |
* OldCoder |
rests |
| 18:19 |
|
CraigyDavi` joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:21 |
|
CraigyDavi`` joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:24 |
|
dust_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:38 |
|
gravgun joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:50 |
|
gravgun joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:52 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:52 |
|
zat joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:54 |
|
RiZom-91 joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:55 |
RiZom-91 |
Hi there! Is there an "easy" way to make entities flammable as node please ? |
| 18:55 |
RiZom-91 |
I've tried groups = {flammable=2} but no success |
| 18:56 |
sfan5 |
entities can't burn |
| 18:56 |
sfan5 |
so, no |
| 18:58 |
RiZom-91 |
Would it be merged if someone (me?) changes this in the core code ? or is it a chosen feature ? |
| 19:01 |
sfan5 |
pull requests are always welcome |
| 19:01 |
sfan5 |
especially if they add new useful features |
| 19:02 |
RiZom-91 |
ok so I will try to do something for this |
| 19:03 |
proller |
welcome ignoring |
| 19:03 |
proller |
for |
| 19:03 |
Calinou |
proller, solved in freeminer? |
| 19:03 |
proller |
yes |
| 19:06 |
RiZom-91 |
proller? you already have this (flammable entities) in freeminer? |
| 19:06 |
proller |
no |
| 19:07 |
RiZom-91 |
so I don't understand your comment ? |
| 19:08 |
RiZom-91 |
why would it be ignored ? |
| 19:08 |
sol_invictus |
because everything is ignored in minetest |
| 19:11 |
RiZom-91 |
maybe. I'll see (if and when I'll have something good to pull...). |
| 19:30 |
Krock |
:/ latest irrlicht seems to be incompatible with MT or just broken |
| 19:30 |
Krock |
(r3526) |
| 19:33 |
Krock |
yeah. the stuff crashes without even starting irrlicht |
| 19:56 |
|
shadowzone joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:57 |
|
shadowzone joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:00 |
|
shadowzone joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:35 |
|
Miner_48er joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:05 |
Krock |
ShadowNinja, I can reproduce the "bug" and uploaded an image. you wouldn't see more on an animated image. it just spawns and expires |
| 21:07 |
ShadowNinja |
Krock: Give me a few minutes and I'll confirm it. |
| 21:07 |
Krock |
okay. |
| 21:14 |
ShadowNinja |
Krock: Confirmed. |
| 21:17 |
Krock |
:) |
| 21:25 |
|
iqualfragile joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:32 |
ShadowNinja |
Comments? This is a modified version of donat-b's last_login patch: http://sprunge.us/JgjM?diff |
| 21:33 |
|
iqualfragile joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:47 |
|
iqualfragile joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:47 |
kaeza |
ShadowNinja, in line 39, you try to assert that last_login is a number, but I see nowhere where you actually ensure it is a number to begin with |
| 21:48 |
ShadowNinja |
kaeza: Good catch, thanks. |
| 21:48 |
ShadowNinja |
I thought I got all of those. |
| 21:48 |
kaeza |
only thing I see is last_login = tonumber(last_login), but at that point, the original last_login could be nil (due to not being in auth.txt), so tonumber() returns nil |
| 21:49 |
kaeza |
maybe last_login = tonumber(last_login) or 0 ? |
| 21:51 |
kaeza |
other than that, looks good |
| 21:52 |
|
iqualfragile joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:52 |
kaeza |
`/last-login` could be `/last_login` or `/lastlogin` to be consistent (think `/setpassword`) |
| 21:58 |
ShadowNinja |
kaeza: Yes, both of those things were as it was before but 1. 0 is still a perfectly good date, nil is a better way to indicate invalidity. 2. It's two seperate words, so they should be seperated. I just like '-' for commands because it's allowed. |
| 21:58 |
ShadowNinja |
The way I want to do this I have to change string.split though ('+' -> '*' in regex). |
| 21:59 |
ShadowNinja |
So a:b:c::d -> {'a','b','c','','d'} |
| 21:59 |
ShadowNinja |
The issue of the dozen or so different ways that a split function can act is discussed at length in a ua-users wiki article. |
| 22:01 |
|
shadowzone joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:12 |
|
iqualfragile joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:45 |
|
darkrose joined #minetest-dev |
