Time Nick Message 02:22 Blockhead256[m] flux: that's a source of endless debate. Basically a lot of programmers like it in .txt, it's not actually usually a perfect markdown formatted file, and you can change the extension yourself if you like 02:23 Blockhead256[m] there are editors with WYSIWYG/preview markdown editing and tools like pandoc to render markdowns on your own systems 04:21 MTDiscord Can't we have both? 04:21 MTDiscord yeah, you make it a markdown file, then you can append ?plain or something to the end of the url 04:23 MTDiscord https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/README.md?plain=1 for example 04:23 MTDiscord then allows you to link lines like so https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/README.md?plain=1#L58 04:23 MTDiscord relevant pr https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/12449 10:19 MTDiscord I tried to build with luajit again. However I try, it doesn't work. Here's the smallest repro I could come up with: https://pastebin.com/A0Jb3t0Z Could anyone please take a look and say where I am dumb? 10:35 sfan5 you say you didn't install luajit but there's "libluajit-5.1-dev" in your apt line 10:36 MTDiscord Yes, that's the item I deleted from that line 10:36 sfan5 plus if you link with a .so file it will (as always) start looking in /usr/lib, /usr/lib64 or whatever else 10:36 sfan5 so it won't find the one in /home/vboxuser/5.7.0/LuaJIT/src/ 10:37 sfan5 not at runtime that is, it will compile fine 10:37 MTDiscord I tried linkling with the .a file, but then I got the "thing is old" warning 10:39 sfan5 that might be an edge case with the symbol detection, not sure 10:42 MTDiscord If I compile with -DLUA_LIBRARY="/home/vboxuser/5.7.0/LuaJIT/src/libluajit.a" the ldd doesn't show luajit at all 10:42 MTDiscord while cmake says: -- Found LuaJIT: /home/vboxuser/5.7.0/LuaJIT/src/libluajit.a 11:10 sfan5 it's working correctly then 11:13 MTDiscord Despite ldd not showing luajit it is correct? 11:20 MTDiscord I added worldedit, startet a game and did //lua core.chat_send_all(dump(jit)) and it shows, among other values, version = "LuaJIT 2.1.0-beta3" I'm pretty confused now ... 11:54 sfan5 ldd shows dynamically loaded libraries, .a is a static library 11:55 sfan5 "LuaJIT 2.1.0-beta3" has been the name of the latest development state for years 11:55 sfan5 you can't tell the 2.1.0-beta3 release apart from a git clone that way 11:55 sfan5 (yes, that's stupid) 12:12 MTDiscord you can change "-beta3" to "-beta4" or something else 12:30 Blockhead256[m] ..which is something that LuaJIT itself should have done a while ago. Or just admit to moving to something like rolling release. LuaJIT is kinda neglected honestly :( 12:45 MTDiscord Is there maybe a more modern fork? From first glance, a lot of people forked, but none is considered "new canon" ? 13:30 MTDiscord try openresty's LJ https://github.com/openresty/luajit2 13:38 sfan5 i think mike pall once indicated that he hasn't favorable toward the openresty fork 13:38 sfan5 moonjit died 13:38 sfan5 really upstream luajit is good, the author just thinks version numbers are nonsense 13:49 LonelyMusicDisc Do they not worry about errors and instability? That's some confidence right there. 13:53 LonelyMusicDisc Nevermind, upstream means something else 16:21 MinetestBot 02[git] 04lhofhansl -> 03minetest/minetest: Restart map-send cycle if visible blocks are soon to be unloaded. (#1… 1348fc286 https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/48fc286a9500abfbd6c05f2002d73cc8ba57eebb (152023-03-30T16:19:13Z)