Time Nick Message 05:56 lissobone nubetest 05:57 lissobone Greetings. 05:57 lissobone I have been fighting demons in Hell until now. 05:58 DeepThgt hello lissobone 05:58 DeepThgt how are you 05:58 lissobone I am approximately alright precisely as of now. 05:58 DeepThgt good 06:01 lissobone Exactly in 5 minutes 22 seconds 98 nanosecods I will not be alright like I am now. By then I will have already commited multiple felonies on copyright ground. 06:01 DeepThgt lol I do this daily 06:01 lissobone How do you manage to do this daily? 06:01 DeepThgt seeding 06:01 lissobone And sharing the software? 06:01 Blockhead256[m] there's a lot of linux ISOs to be seeding :) 06:01 DeepThgt all kinds of media 06:02 lissobone GNU/Linux would be more correct, unless all bootable images contain no GNU software at all, which is very unlikely. 06:03 Blockhead256[m] some of them are alpine :P 06:03 lissobone True. 06:03 lissobone But does the presence of Alpine invalidate GNU? 06:03 lissobone Neither does GNU invalidate the presence of the first. 06:03 Blockhead256[m] GNU, Linux, and BSD ISOs 06:05 lissobone You may just say "free system ISOs", since all of them are free as in freedom (not as in price), or at least are comprised of mostly free software. 06:05 lissobone They're free, but most contain some nonfree software. It's a stretch. 06:05 Blockhead256[m] debian stretch was EOL 2020-07-06 :P 06:07 lissobone No, not as in debian stretch, but as in a term which definition does not fully match with what it's applied to. 06:08 Blockhead256[m] okay since you're so passionate 06:08 Blockhead256[m] which is more free: permissive or copyleft licenses? 06:08 lissobone Collectively calling all such seeded distributions "linux" disregards, first of all, GNU, since GNU is the system while linux is the kernel, and BSD, which have nothing to do with neither GNU nor linux. 06:08 lissobone Well... 06:08 lissobone Depends on how you define freedom. 06:08 lissobone But there is an official definition already. 06:09 Blockhead256[m] well, who will we ask? The FSF or the OSI? 06:09 lissobone Free software grants user four freedoms: freedom to execute the program for any purpose, freedom to modify and study it, distribute verbatim and modified copies. 06:11 lissobone There's a list of free licenses, as I recall, on the FSF website. GNU GPL is a strong copyleft license and it imposes some restrictions, but those restrictions are designed to prohibit acts a good citizen would not like to do. 06:11 lissobone You can, of course, say, that MIT, BSD or other permissive (pushover) are freer, since they allow to do more with the program. 06:12 lissobone (There's no comma after say). 06:13 lissobone But they have a flaw, and that's allowing to relicense the software under a different, often nonfree license. 06:14 Blockhead256[m] aha, a straight answer 06:14 Blockhead256[m] yeah personally I like the AGPL for Minetest mods 06:15 lissobone Since they're often used on servers, aren't they? 06:15 Blockhead256[m] right, so the additional clauses of the Affero part require people who run a server with modified versions of AGPL mods must publish their modifications 06:16 lissobone I don't think that it's hard to run an extra FTP or HTTP server along with minetest. 06:17 Blockhead256[m] right, even I have an HTTP server along with minetestserver on the same VPS 09:42 lissobone Greetings. 11:43 Blockhead256[m] Would you all recommend mobs_animal or animalia for a new world? Is it going to be hard to fix if i already generated a lot of the world to switch to animalia? 11:58 calcul0n you'll probably get a lot of unknown items, and maybe some unknown nodes 11:58 calcul0n it's annoying but the map should still be playable 11:59 Blockhead256[m] the important thing is: how can I make sure mobs spawn in the old areas? 12:00 calcul0n mob spawn is not related to mapgen, it only depends on things like altitude and node types 12:00 Blockhead256[m] okay and will animalia be compatible with cooking recipes from farming_redo/undo? 12:01 calcul0n no idea, i only know mobs_animal 12:02 Blockhead256[m] ok well thanks for your input 12:02 calcul0n i'd say the best is to try them both and see what you prefer 12:03 Blockhead256[m] well I'm going to be running a server so if one of them performs better I'd rather use it 15:12 schubisu Blockhead256[m]: asking myself very similar questions. Let me know when you find out more ;) 15:23 DeepThgt i have only used mobs_redo, its pretty conservative with resources at default settings 15:24 calcul0n also note that you can use both mods together 15:25 calcul0n i don't like to have such redundant stuff but some people don't care 15:25 Blockhead256[m] it would be a bit odd to get two cows that can't interbreed 15:26 calcul0n indeed :) 15:26 calcul0n with a bit of rp you can pretend they are different species 15:38 independent56 I have a crazy idea; earth in Minetest 15:38 independent56 to scale 15:38 independent56 Every 60 km^2 square of the world has its own server 15:38 Blockhead256[m] you'd need minetest32 15:39 independent56 Generated by Perl, every server exists together 15:41 Blockhead256[m] federated Minetest has been postulated 15:41 independent56 ? 15:41 Blockhead256[m] there would be an advantage compared to a flat world though, so you could slice squares off the surface of the sphere (geoid) instead of one big flat earth 15:42 Blockhead256[m] federated Minetest meaning features for letting a Minetest client navigate between different servers that have agreed to share player data 15:42 mrkubax10 interesting idea 15:42 independent56 I have an even worse idea: would i be allowed to spoof the existence of the server to servers.minetest.net and by emailing my server 5 minutes in advance with the server you would like to oin, it spins up the server and you can join it 15:42 independent56 That would be a good idea; federated minetest# 15:43 Blockhead256[m] you can run own list instead: https://github.com/minetest/serverlist/ 15:43 independent56 I can imagine a group of servers making the "Minetest Union" and having a "schengen area" 15:43 independent56 But yeah, running my own server list would be intresting 15:43 independent56 Maybe i send existance data to both 15:44 DeepThgt it would lead to an odd play experience, as inventory would be diff between worlds 15:44 independent56 Would it be against the server.minetest.net rules to run that many servers? 15:45 Blockhead256[m] deja vu except it was a different person asking 15:45 independent56 it would be about (7.48 * (10 ^ 7)) / 60, or 1246666.66667 15:46 independent56 different server 15:46 Blockhead256[m] the answer I recall back then was - rules aren't hard and fast, but if you cause too much load for the server you can be barred/banned 15:46 independent56 I'll probably never go do it 15:46 independent56 So i run my own server list, put all the worlds there, and then set up an email service to respond to server run requests 15:46 independent56 With captachs to prevent bots 15:47 Blockhead256[m] also where do you get metre accurate GIS data? 15:47 independent56 The servers only capture the scale of earth and not the actual physical of it 15:47 independent56 Maybe later on i make the server follow google data 15:48 independent56 I guess i'll make my own server system 15:49 independent56 Here's what happens when a client joins the server > Spawns at point null > Moves out of the server > Automatically reconnected to a different server to continue play 15:50 independent56 And then you might even end up in Africa 15:50 Blockhead256[m] it is always easiest to prototype with existing technology 15:50 Blockhead256[m] .. or the middle of the south atlantic 15:51 independent56 I might even make my custom client which is dumbed down and only allows joining the server 15:52 independent56 But the co-ordinates are IRL co-ordinates 15:52 independent56 Even crazier idea: 15:53 independent56 A IRL robot takes a video and streams it to the client and allows you to move around earth in real life from Minetest 15:53 independent56 Using sattelites i launched into space 15:53 independent56 To help me keep it connected to the server 15:54 independent56 What do you think? 15:54 independent56 Would it cause chaos if i released it in Germany? 16:01 independent56 In fact, we don't even need minetest for this. 16:01 independent56 Just a small web interface to control the bot 16:03 independent56 I can even add a speaker and laser gun which people can also control remotely 16:12 proller use https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/12142 and serve whole world from one server 16:20 independent56 Good idea 16:21 independent56 But i like my solution more because more 56independent.github.io/portfolio credit lol 16:21 independent56 *http://56independent.gitlab.io/portfolio