Time  Nick       Message
12:50 Krock      til Minetest is a barnyard
12:56 VanessaE   I thought it was a zoo?
12:56 VanessaE   :P
12:57 Krock      perhaps..
12:58 VanessaE   or an asylum
12:58 VanessaE   :)
13:09 Krock      \busername\b
13:10 Krock      "*Krock" highlights me because * is not a valid IRC name character
13:10 Krock      so in hexchat it might be [^A-z0-9_]username[^A-z0-9_]
13:12 Krock      VanessaE: .*$NICK.* would be very unhandy in case your nickname is a common syllable
13:12 * VanessaE shrugs
13:39 CWz        Hello Vanessa of E
13:40 VanessaE   hi
14:48 TenPlus1   hi folks
14:48 TenPlus1   hey Krock
14:48 Krock      damn it
14:49 Krock      hi TenPlus1
14:49 TenPlus1   :)
14:49 TenPlus1   don't suppose you know of any way to change player hp to a lower value without the red screen and damage sound playing ?
14:52 Krock      yes sure I do. spawn the player in lava so it doesn't look unusual and then mute
14:52 TenPlus1   hahaha, nice
14:52 Krock      no I don't
14:52 Krock      there's however a workaround in the issue. configurable max HP for all  players
14:53 TenPlus1   +1000 would be much better
14:53 Krock      BUT
14:53 Krock      that means the player HP will be 1 for everybody as soon the mod is disabled
14:53 Krock      but the max value back up to 20
14:54 TenPlus1   hrmmmm
14:54 TenPlus1   issues with da fix as well
14:55 Krock      and mods which raise the max HP to a very high number would leave the players with an insane high amount in case the mod is disabled
14:55 Krock      unless there's a mod to change it back to 20 whenever someone joins
14:55 TenPlus1   this should be a player override I think
14:58 Krock      it is.
14:58 Krock      it's already a player property
14:58 TenPlus1   hi ANAND
14:58 TenPlus1   hah, 5.0 is getting new stuff again
14:58 ANAND      Heya TenPlus1! Long time no see :)
14:59 TenPlus1   o/
14:59 TenPlus1   was walking my snail, took forever
14:59 ANAND      Heh
14:59 TenPlus1   what's new ?
15:00 ANAND      Nothing much, I'm afraid :)
15:00 TenPlus1   slow winter :) same here...  tinkering with Os tho
15:01 TenPlus1   disabled spectre meltdown fix and got my system back up to full speed again :))
15:01 ANAND      Lol
15:02 TenPlus1   and deleting many emails from he who shall not be named
15:03 VanessaE   don't delete them.  archive.
15:03 TenPlus1   hi Vanessa
15:03 ANAND      Voldemort sends you emails? o_O
15:03 TenPlus1   yeah, somehow me got my addy
15:03 VanessaE   no, Voldemort isn't this bad :P
15:04 ANAND      Ha true
15:04 TenPlus1   the emails sounds like babble, have been deleting them for weeks now
15:04 VanessaE   oh.
15:05 TenPlus1   he's up to something
15:05 VanessaE   he's a little chihuahua barking his head off
15:05 VanessaE   nothing more :)
15:06 TenPlus1   annoying as one also
15:06 Krock      don't say his name
15:06 TenPlus1   hi xenon
15:06 VanessaE   they're not all annoying, just that one.
15:06 _Xenon     Hello
15:06 VanessaE   the little guy on my desk is a sweetie :)
15:06 TenPlus1   hehehe
15:06 Krock      TenPlus1: funny but sad to watch the "bugs" list in /proc/cpuinfo grow the more recent kernel version you've got
15:06 * TenPlus1 offers doggy a donut
15:07 VanessaE   oh he'd gobble that up for sure :)
15:07 VanessaE   Dandy has a bit of a sweet tooth
15:07 TenPlus1   Krock: I've got spi=off and a cpu fix for j2900 in place, so dont see them
15:08 Krock      bugs		: cpu_meltdown spectre_v1 spectre_v2 spec_store_bypass l1tf
15:08 VanessaE   AMD here, so no Spectre worries.  Not sure about Meltdown
15:08 Krock      with 4.20 (weed lol) there will be more of them I guess
15:08 TenPlus1   my next desky will be an Amd...
15:08 TenPlus1   am liking those more and more
15:09 TenPlus1   intel_idle.max_cstate=1 and pti=off
15:09 TenPlus1   stops slowdown and fixes intel glitch with that cpu
15:10 Krock      I think it would already result in a faster processing time if the affected parts could be turned off
15:11 TenPlus1   the newer intel bug they found is suppose to hit some cpu's up to 20% speed reduction, it's gonna come with an opt-in switch
15:12 VanessaE   man Intel really screwed the pooch..
15:12 Krock      https://www.zdnet.com/article/linus-torvalds-after-big-linux-performance-hit-spectre-v2-patch-needs-curbs/
15:12 TenPlus1   hell, I may even buy a NanoPi NEO4 arm board...  tiny and more powerful than my desktop
15:13 TenPlus1   would make for an ideal minetest server :)
15:15 Calinou    ARM and game servers rarely mix well due to the need in good single-threaded CPU performance
15:15 Calinou    heavyweight game servers are often VPS-unfriendly already :(
15:15 TenPlus1   hi Cal
15:16 * TenPlus1 rewrites minetest in ruby to support multiple cores...   *as if*
15:16 Calinou    heh
15:16 Calinou    you mean Rust?
15:17 Calinou    Ruby isn't known for high parallelism possibilities
15:17 TenPlus1   er... dunno :P just pulled the name outta my ass really :DD
15:20 Krock      eww
15:20 TenPlus1   prolly a good word to describe Rust :D
15:21 nore       oh, hey, Calinou
15:22 nore       VanessaE wanted your opinion on https://github.com/minetest-mods/moreblocks/pull/134
15:22 TenPlus1   hi nore
15:22 nore       hi :)
15:22 Calinou    I'm testing it locally right now
15:23 TenPlus1   basic_materials is spreading :D
15:23 Krock      hi nore :D
15:23 Krock      TenPlus1: not sure if it's forth a ":D"
15:23 Krock      s/f/w/
15:23 nore       hey all
15:23 TenPlus1   :P
15:27 TenPlus1   hi Grandolf
15:27 Grandolf   hello
15:27 Krock      hi Grandolf
15:28 Grandolf   hi krock
15:38 TenPlus1   foody time, bbl o/
16:27 IhrFussel  What causes HUD elements to not disappear even though hud_remove() is called? Connection wasn't gone either
16:28 IhrFussel  And it's also not a conflict cause the command that causes the HUD element to appear has only been sent once
16:29 IhrFussel  Basically I have a text HUD that is supposed to disappear after 15 seconds but sometimes it just doesn't
16:31 Krock      A: HUDs are messed up
16:31 Krock      that or because it's UDP. packets might get lost
16:32 IhrFussel  Krock, so I'm guessing the client does not send the server a "HUD changed" confirmation packet and the server just assumes that the client got the data?
16:49 Krock      exactly. the client barely ever sends feedbacks to the server
17:34 rubenwardy Are you sure?
17:34 rubenwardy Minetest supports reliable packets
17:34 rubenwardy Using it here would make sense
17:46 Krock      but how reliable are they?
17:47 Krock      all of the HUD packets are sent as "reliable" FYI https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/src/network/serveropcodes.cpp#L189-L193
17:49 Krock      in fact, the only unreliable packet is the client's position sending
18:36 rubenwardy I thought so
18:37 rubenwardy And entity position sending
18:37 rubenwardy Hopefully
18:40 Krock      hmm gob_cmd_update_position
18:41 Krock      yes, not reliable.
18:42 Krock      https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/src/content_sao.cpp#L787
18:55 rubenwardy How many channels are used?
19:13 Krock      *shrug* not a network expert
19:14 Krock      ^ or just: "dunno"
19:23 BillyS     This is a silly question ... but does anyone know what deltasquared's repo is?
19:39 Krock      never heard of that
19:40 Krock      BillyS: ask in #minetest ?
19:40 BillyS     ...I meant where, not what xD
19:40 BillyS     Oh well, and I'll ask there