Luanti logo

IRC log for #minetest-dev, 2024-05-24

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext

All times shown according to UTC.

Enable nick filtering
Time Nick Message
4 more elements. Show/hide.
09:58 [MTMatrix] <grorp> merging #14689, #14690 in 10 min
09:58 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14689 -- Consistent width for internal scrollbars of formspec elements by grorp
09:58 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14690 -- Scale C++ menus down to fit the window by grorp
13 more elements. Show/hide.
20:49 MTDiscord <luatic> is there a reason we are shipping release builds with unit tests or is it just an oversight
20:49 sfan5 nobody ever thought about not doing that
20:50 sfan5 a reason could be that linux distros might want to run tests with the built binary to verify that it works
20:51 sfan5 but that's better adressed by splitting unit tests into a separate binary
20:51 sfan5 in either case you'd have my +1 for defaulting ENABLE_UNITTEST to FALSE on release builds
20:53 MTDiscord <luatic> btw sfan5, would moving test data to devtest be fine?
20:53 MTDiscord <luatic> we are considering this for gltf models. it would have the added benefit of being able to easily verify that the models render as they should.
20:54 sfan5 it's okay if some unit tests depends on devtest being installed imo
20:54 MTDiscord <luatic> alright. we could also just skip the tests if devtest happens to not be installed.
20:55 sfan5 they should not fail if it's missing of course
3 more elements. Show/hide.

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext