Time Nick Message 02:22 lhofhansl Going to merge #14212 in a few. 02:22 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14212 -- Ensure deterministic client occlusion culling and minor improvements by lhofhansl 02:44 lhofhansl Done. Now only #14185 is left in that set of changes. 02:44 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14185 -- Allow active blocks to be generated by lhofhansl 10:46 MTDiscord hello there! I was fixing some graphical issues on the Minetest logo, and I decided to try to make it a bit more consistent. I ended up changing quite a lot. here is the result https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/369123125021114369/1192891156804141116/SPOILER_modified_minetest_logo_V2.0.png can you spot the differences? 10:57 Krock the desert shrunk and you enforced the block unit length 11:50 srifqi hello. merging #13814 in around 10 minutes 11:50 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13814 -- Android: Add selection dialog (drop down/combo box) by srifqi 12:00 srifqi done 13:42 zarac MTDiscord: Thanks for your answer, i missed it. GitHub is privacy intrusive. I cannot support it. 13:43 zarac It'd be nice if this project switched to a more respectable platform.. but that's another topic. ; ) 13:44 zarac MTDiscord: on second thought, not sure you were speaking to me. (luatic) 13:44 MTDiscord zarac: I was speaking to you 13:45 zarac MTDiscord: ok. a bit confusing with the federation-bot. Why don't use normal IRC? 13:45 zarac luatic* : you don't appear as a name in the chat. 13:46 MTDiscord Yeah, I'm using a relay 13:46 MTDiscord normal IRC is annoying due to lack of history 13:47 MTDiscord also, I'd have to run IRC and Discord in parallel 13:47 zarac MTDiscord: ok. Perhaps a so-called bouncer could be another option for ya if you want that. 13:47 zarac MTDiscord: or just ditch discord, lol =D 13:47 MTDiscord yeah, I've heard of bouncers, but as said, it's just the most convenient for me right now to chat from Discord 13:48 zarac alrighty =D 13:48 MTDiscord zarac: I'm afraid I've got too many contacts on Discord to do that 13:48 zarac to each his own ; ) 13:48 MTDiscord Even if I wanted to ditch Discord, I'm locked in by now :| 13:49 zarac yeah. it's quite a shame discord exists.. ; / 13:50 MTDiscord I'm not sure I would call it a shame. Yes, it's proprietary, but it exists for a reason: "Free" chat services simply don't have the same quality. This includes IRC and Matrix in my experience. 13:50 zarac i agree, the quality is always much greater if freedom is allowed. 13:50 zarac =P 13:51 zarac Do you know if there's any plans for the minetest project to switch source-hosting-provider to a fair platform? 13:51 rubenwardy no plans currently 13:52 zarac rubenwardy: ok. thanks. 13:52 rubenwardy see #12324 13:52 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/12324 -- Eventually move to a free git platform 13:52 MTDiscord I've discussed this at length on the forums. In my opinion, "Switching" is absolutely infeasible. Mirroring may be feasible, but someone would have to do the work for that. 13:52 zarac thx 13:52 rubenwardy presumably, we'd keep the GitHub repos but just use them as a readonly mirror 13:52 rubenwardy close off PRs 13:52 rubenwardy and issues 13:52 zarac yeah. mirroring to begin with then switching over, seems reasonable. 13:53 MTDiscord I don't think there will ever be a "switching over". 13:53 MTDiscord There is no need for a "switching over", i.e. terminating the mirror. Just like we haven't terminated IRC. 13:54 MTDiscord (TBF IRC is still the "main" in a way, but there are more "modern" platforms Minetest is represented on now, like Matrix. Still there's no need to kill the IRC when we can just mirror it.) 13:55 rubenwardy The Github would just be a readonly mirror to prevent pulls from breaking. For everything else, we would switch over 13:56 zarac "modernity" is not necessarily your friend. (though i like matrix, too.. since it's fair / a protocol). 13:56 zarac I'm glad this IRC channel exists.. =D 13:57 MTDiscord I'm glad it exists too. 13:58 rubenwardy obligatory https://xkcd.com/1782/ 14:00 rubenwardy who owns the minetest org on codeberg? 14:04 zarac i think i agree with the codeberg option. 14:05 zarac lol @ xkcd =D 14:07 zarac hm.. codeberg.org/minetest is regeistered.. but nothing there. 14:08 zarac seems mineclonia and mineclone2 are there already 14:08 zarac (at codeberg) 14:11 MTDiscord mineclone2 is just a mirror there 17:45 sfan5 any volunteer server owners with decent traffic who could test this PR in prod? https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/14217 17:49 LandarVargan Do I just compile it into the server code and keep an eye out for unusual behavior? 18:03 Krock yes 18:04 Krock curl -Ls https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/14217.patch | git am -3 --ignore-space-change - 18:07 sfan5 or: git fetch origin pull/14217/head && git merge --no-edit FETCH_HEAD 19:20 lhofhansl FWIW, I have tried 14217 locally and have seen no unduly behavior. But it's just minimal load, mostly blocks being transferred. 20:13 sfan5 reminder that #13616 could use another review 20:13 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13616 -- Meshgen tests by numberZero 20:14 sfan5 merging #14200, #14224 in 10m 20:14 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14200 -- [no sq.] Make client use second/fallback IP address from DNS by sfan5 20:14 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/14224 -- Fix dividing by zero crashes of texture modifiers by cx384 20:22 Krock sfan5: What does "void testTriangle() {" actually test in #13818 ? 20:22 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13818 -- Debundle Minetest Game by rollerozxa 20:22 Krock * #13616 20:22 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/13616 -- Meshgen tests by numberZero 20:23 Krock triangles are triangles. what can go wrong there? 20:48 sfan5 no idea 20:50 Krock :/ 22:16 sfan5 maybe it's testing the test methods itself?