Time  Nick      Message
08:59 Zughy[m]  Hello. Why chat_message_limit_per_10sec is a float? https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/f8cef52ea07de6a6ccaa6f9a853a8e5ccaaff4ce/src/remoteplayer.cpp#L37
09:01 Zughy[m]  Like, I get that I might want people to write 1 message per 20 seconds top (so 0.5), but is that so necessary...?
09:02 Zughy[m]  It also sounds like the best way for having people not playing in your server
09:53 MTDiscord <luatic> I'd rather ask: why is it per 10 sec, and not simply per sec?
10:41 Zughy[m]  <MTDiscord> "<luatic> I'd rather ask: why..." <- I wouldn't dare touching an already existing parameter
10:41 Zughy[m]  also, completely unrelated but imho kind of critical: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/11843#issuecomment-1066074504
16:38 erle      Zughy[m] what makes your opinion about what other people should spend their time on critical?
17:19 Desour    other question: is m_setting_chat_message_limit_per_10sec per 10 seconds or per 8 seconds? https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/f8cef52ea07de6a6ccaa6f9a853a8e5ccaaff4ce/src/remoteplayer.cpp#L85
17:26 sfan5     who knows
17:26 Desour    (FYI, the PR that introduced it (#4571) makes me guess that it was just a stupid rename)
17:26 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/4571 -- Chat: new settings by nerzhul
18:04 Zughy[m]  <erle> "Zughy what makes your opinion..." <- I think my comment clearly states that it's not an opinion of mine and that I provided facts in support of my thesis, I'm sorry you see it that way
18:09 erle      “i'm sorry you see it that way” is the most condescending shit, stop doing that.
18:10 erle      yes, you provided arguments, but they are lacking rigor. why would masochism be a bad thing?
18:11 erle      when i compare the masochism argument to stuff like “breaking network compat splits community”, the latter seems much more grounded in objective reality
18:11 erle      that's why i said “opinion”
18:12 erle      i may be wrong here
18:12 erle      regardless, why do you think it is so important to stop the discussion? evidently only people who think it is worth their time will contribute.
18:12 erle      and only as much as they want to
18:13 erle      it costs absolutely nothing to let people add their opinions or even facts regarding the matter
18:14 Krock     rubenwardy: it seems that the meeting did not take place? would you please be so nice to announce the next one on the Engine team discussion page?
18:38 Zughy[m]  <erle> "yes, you provided arguments, but..." <- nice strawman, I'm out. Also, if you have a problem with me (I guess you're Erlehmann), please say it to my face next time without finding excuses to argue. Life is too precious to be intoxicated in this environment. What a sad person you are. Bye bye
18:39 erle      i don't have a problem with you, i have a problem with some of your arguments
18:40 erle      and ofc the ragequitting behaviour when encountering opposition
18:40 erle      not the first time
18:40 erle      i have argued much more vehemently against other people and they didn't ragequit, so …
18:41 MTDiscord <Jonathon> is it really ragequiting, or do they just not want to waste there time with you
19:03 erle      well, i have seen zughy react to others similarly
19:04 erle      regardless, i'm not here to debate a person, i wanted an answer to my question
19:04 erle      i won't get that, so topic is over for me