Time  Nick      Message
03:40 MTDiscord <exe_virus> Why do we have a 10x scaling on entity meshes vs node meshes?  I.e. the same node mesh loaded as an entity mesh is 10 times smaller.
09:35 sfan5     the engine uses a scale factor of 10 internally and someone forgot to hide this implementation detail from entities
11:19 MTDiscord <exe_virus> Could we please hide it by default? It really should be the same for both
11:20 sfan5     "could we please break backwards compatibility by default"
11:20 sfan5     sure if you wait until 6.0
11:23 sfan5     more seriously: yes this is obviously a good idea, it should have never been this way. hecks has mentioned fixing it before, but we can't 'just' do that without caring about existing mods
11:39 pgimeno   IIRC the solution he proposed was a field in the mesh to ignore the scale
12:52 nrz       merging #11570
12:52 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/11570 -- Update Dockerfile to Alpine 3.14 by nerzhul
13:45 pgimeno   <pgimeno> IIRC the solution he proposed was a field in the mesh to ignore the scale  <--  I mean in the node definition, sorry
15:24 nrz       sfan5: when you have time this one is pretty easy too ? 11571
15:24 nrz       #11571
15:24 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/11571 -- [NOSQUASH] Add debian 11 & fedora 34 to CI by nerzhul
15:24 nrz       fedora24 & debian 11 on the CI
15:25 sfan5     is there anything special about fedora34?
15:25 sfan5     because I don't see any advantage of building for it specificially
15:25 sfan5     (we don't even generate a package)
15:32 MTDiscord <josiah_wi> Is there a downside to adding platforms to CI? If nothing else I imagine courtesy to the server host is a valid consideration, but that doesn't seem like a major thing, maybe not a concern at all for some people.
15:32 nrz       just to ensure it works on redhat style recent things ? the 28 was already there and is pretty old
15:33 nrz       i should say if a platform has sufficient userbase, just add a platform to ensure nobody will complain because package is not present on its repo ?
15:34 nrz       seems they build us on their RPM: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/minetest at least we can reduce the fedora maintain work it by testing before on CI :p
18:23 Krock     Agh. Unfortunately I cannot attend the meeting that I set up last Sunday. This is a pity, and hope that it still yields helpful discussions
18:24 Krock     alternatively, it could be moved to a week later, or to any other following day if that's wanted
18:25 Krock     Other: I don't think it makes much sense to add more CI of similar configurations. If one configuration is tested on one distro, that's good enough I'd say
18:26 sfan5     what about saturday?
18:26 Krock     it is planned for saturday, and I created the post two days ago, which was a sunday.
18:28 sfan5     oh
18:28 sfan5     I keep forgetting what day we usually do it on
18:28 Krock     usually it was Saturday, but Sunday would be fine for me too
21:40 MTDiscord <exe_virus> Can I bump a pending pull request for that meeting?
21:40 MTDiscord <exe_virus> The game music one