Time Nick Message 17:23 rubenwardy I suggest releasing 5.1.1 with as little fixes as necessary, and then aiming for 5.2.0 at the end of feb/march 17:23 rubenwardy that way we have time to fix the android port and polish some of the formspec changes 17:23 rubenwardy #9252 17:23 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9252 -- Backport 5.1.1 by rubenwardy 17:38 p_gimeno f6de86c is pretty close to trivial I'd say 17:39 p_gimeno "Adjust position and rotation independently of whether it's visible" 17:40 p_gimeno that's how I read the patch 17:42 rubenwardy it depends on the former 17:47 p_gimeno it says it was broken by commit 81c2370 17:47 p_gimeno that one isn't listed in your list, and indeed it's complex 17:50 rubenwardy ahh 17:51 rubenwardy added 23:42 Wuzzy If someone (wink, wink) would ever redo Minimal, what would be the minimal (pun not intended!) requirements? 23:43 rubenwardy with the same purpose, a demonstration of most API features 23:43 rubenwardy minimal is ok as-is, just doesn't show everything 23:44 Wuzzy https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=23802 good? 23:44 Wuzzy i was bored and added a lot of dummy nodes to test out drawtypes ? 23:44 rubenwardy sounds good 23:45 Wuzzy what i dont like about minimal is that its currently pretty messy code 23:45 Wuzzy i get that its meant to test the engine , but i dont think it does a good job at it atm 23:46 Wuzzy a lot of well-known bugs cannot be reproduced with it atm, simply due to lack of stuff 23:47 Wuzzy the worst part of minimal imo is the "experimental" mod. very messy and some of the code looks like ancient legacy that has no relevance anymore. at least thats what it looks like to me 23:49 Wuzzy rubenwardy: but the formspec test is good, this looks pretty comprehensive as well ?