Time  Nick         Message
13:14 Krock        rubenwardy, so #7462 is a duplicate of your old issue. Is there any reason to use the new in favour of the older issue?
13:14 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7462 -- While Joining Formspecs
13:15 rubenwardy   well yes
13:15 rubenwardy   someone cares about
13:15 rubenwardy   I closed the issue because I no longer cared that much
13:16 Krock        The rules say that the newer duplicate issue should be closed. This means re-opening 2324
13:17 rubenwardy   the older one didn't really have any conversation
14:42 paramat      rubenwardy do you want to keep #6538 open? see my comment https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6538#issuecomment-380247159
14:42 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6538 -- Formspec: Allow 'position[]' anywhere, just like backgrounds
14:43 rubenwardy   no, doesn't matter
14:43 rubenwardy   I'm planning on introducing a new sfinv API
14:43 paramat      ok thanks
14:43 rubenwardy   the   sfinv.make_formspec   thing is kinda gross
14:44 rubenwardy   instead I'll have it return a table, which can include size and position etc
14:44 paramat      nice. closed
14:46 paramat      #7456 is fairly simple and has a good description, if anyone can look
14:46 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7456 -- Decoration API: Add lightweight ability to have complete coverage by paramat
14:46 rubenwardy   complete code coverage?? :O
14:46 rubenwardy   /s
14:46 rubenwardy   /jk
14:46 Krock        would be a dream if the code was meant lol
14:48 rubenwardy   better than the current 12%
15:10 nerzhul      12%, really ? i thought 5% :)
15:10 nerzhul      at least i continue to add coverage, i hope you can help me to improve it, it prevent regressoin and permit to catch anoying bugs during redaction, sometimes :)
15:14 paramat      #2663 seems like a close, unless i misunderstand?
15:14 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/2663 -- [Request] Improve EnvArgsEnd errors
15:15 rubenwardy   it's still a bug
15:17 paramat      ok :)
17:32 ManElevation heya! i need help with a server issue
17:32 ManElevation my server is now on ipv6
17:33 ManElevation and players without ipv6 cant connect to my server
17:33 ManElevation how do i make my server support ipv4?
17:33 Krock        bind it to an ipv4 address
17:33 ManElevation i cant have a ipv4 server because my portfowarding does not allow that anymore
17:34 ManElevation what do you mean bind it?
17:34 Krock        https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/minetest.conf.example#L1068
17:34 sfan5        unless you fiddled with the bind address settings, just using ipv6_server = true should still allow ipv4 clients to connect
17:35 Krock        the gateway/router would still have to redirect the ipv4 address correctly to your server
17:35 Krock        assuming that you're behind a local network, home style.
17:35 ManElevation i have this 2 enable_ipv6 = true ipv6_server = true
17:36 ManElevation no because some people are actually connection to my server but people with out a ipv6 cant
17:36 sfan5        then ipv4 clients should still be able to connect
17:36 ManElevation so its not on local
17:36 Krock        "Enable/disable running an IPv6 server. An IPv6 server may be restricted to IPv6 clients, depending on system configuration." ~ conf.example file
17:37 Krock        and that's when ipv6_server = true
17:38 ManElevation ok give me a min ill do some test and ill tell you if it works now
17:38 sfan5        Krock: while that's technically correct, in practice there will be no system for which that is true
17:39 sfan5        in fact, this behaviour is specified in the standard https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3493#section-3.7
17:40 sfan5        see also https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt -> /proc/sys/net/ipv6/bindv6only
18:52 Krock        sfan5, thanks for the ACID insight. Something learnt today :)
18:57 paramat      reverting bugfix will merge later tonight #7464
18:57 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7464 -- Biome dust: Revert fix that added dust to mod structures by paramat
19:01 Krock        so #7392 will be present again?
19:01 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7392 -- Biome dust fails when solid surface falls below mapchunk base
19:14 paramat      yes unfortunately. but i will fix missing water decorations if there is water but no solid nodes in a column
19:15 paramat      if i can think of a way to fix 7392 without making a mess i'll do it, but might be difficult
20:10 Krock        testing game#2126
20:10 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2126 -- disallow beds destroying if used by bell07
20:14 Krock        paramat, is the formspec size, size[8,15] intentional? 8,5 would suffice
20:17 rubenwardy   8 15 won't be good on mobiles
20:17 rubenwardy   Assume landscape
20:20 Krock        oh right, context is the beds mod, which uses this value since it was added
20:50 paramat      erm no idea
21:00 paramat      thanks will merge that tonight
21:01 paramat      in fact now
21:07 paramat      done
21:08 paramat      merging #7464
21:08 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7464 -- Biome dust: Revert fix that added dust to mod structures by paramat
21:10 paramat      done!
23:59 rubenwardy   game#2152
23:59 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2152 -- Add sfinv.set_page_and_show() by rubenwardy