Time  Nick        Message
05:00 ShadowNinja Hmmm, forgot to push my chat_send_player patch...
08:01 ShadowNinja ~tell sapier Um, it seems something's broken on my server with the conn... http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7003860/
08:01 ShadowBot   ShadowNinja: O.K.
08:24 ShadowNinja Is there a way to print something without logging it from Lua?
17:34 VRMac       Is this the proper channel to suggest changes, or is there a forum/bug tracker for that?
17:34 PilzAdam    https://forum.minetest.net/index.php
17:34 PilzAdam    but you could also suggest stuff here, I guess
17:35 PilzAdam    or open an issue: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues?state=open
17:36 VRMac       Guess I have a quick question then. Is there a reason that the jump height is almost identical (if not identical) to the block height? Was immediately jumping after reaching the next block an intended feature? From someone used to the Minecraft controls, it just feels wrong.
17:47 celeron55_  in minecraft the controls are excessively clumsy
17:47 celeron55_  and that is not due to jump height, it is due to simply the fact that minecraft delays the next jump (afaik)
18:25 ShadowNinja VRMac: That's intentional.  It was even more so before some physics changes a while ago.   In MC you don't jump up stairs 300 nodes long...
19:23 xyz         I added -std=c++0x to cmake cxx flags and now defined(linux) is false yet defined(__linux) still works fine
19:25 sfan5       I don't think that is set in the C++ standard
19:25 sfan5       +behaviour
19:26 xyz         https://gist.github.com/xyzz/157b4dcca0ec792864e3
20:34 kahrl       xyz: I guess that's because the standard doesn't reserve the identifier linux to the implementation
20:36 kahrl       it does reserve _linux (in the global namespace) and __linux (anywhere)
20:36 kahrl       although if _linux is a macro name, that's a bit weird
20:36 kahrl       er, I misread the paste, yeah __linux and __linux__ are reserved anywhere
22:43 ShadowNinja sapier: Hmmm, I can connect, but there's an error and some duplication: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/7007526/
22:47 sapier      well that's not a real "error" this can happen if a packet is still queued while your peer is already removed... guess the loglevel should be reduced to info
22:47 sapier      and duplication seems like a c&p log message