Time  Nick        Message
18:25 MinetestBot 02[git] 04SmallJoker -> 03minetest/minetest: reportMetadataChange; Silence clang warnings 132a69f87 https://git.io/fhfK1 (152018-12-21T18:05:29Z)
19:04 MinetestBot 02[git] 04numberZero -> 03minetest-mods/mesecons: Make sticky piston stick falling things as well (#436) 136e767a6 https://git.io/fhfPo (152018-12-21T19:02:57Z)
19:07 scr267      I don't know if anyone remembers a few weeks ago when I was having major issues generating a map with any kind of reasonable speed.  I've done some tests this morning and found that the forked minetestmapper from adrido is much much faster in my case.
19:07 scr267      https://github.com/adrido/minetest-mapper-cpp
19:07 scr267      I'm not sure the exact difference, why it would be so huge, but its considerable.
19:08 scr267      I think there are a few caveats however.  When I benchmarked a 1024,1024 tile between the original minetest/mintestmapper project I ended up with these numbers:
19:08 scr267      Orig: 20 seconds
19:09 scr267      adrido's: 9 seconds
19:09 scr267      The other thing that's happening is when I used this in combination with est31's leaftest script I get a serious performance improvement as well.
19:10 scr267      When I used est31's leaftest script with minetest/minetestmapper, it would take about 3 ~ 5 seconds to generate a single tile.  Even empty ones.
19:11 scr267      Now with adrido's it flies through the empty ones REALLY quickly: 0.035s realtime  vs a tile with data: 0.245s realtime.
19:13 MinetestBot 02[git] 04Hawk777 -> 03minetest-mods/mesecons: Document inactive block behaviour (#447) 13302a289 https://git.io/fhfXT (152018-12-21T19:10:08Z)
23:25 paramat     scr267 maybe you could open an issue in the mtmapper repo about adrido's fork and the speed increase?