| Time |
Nick |
Message |
| 00:19 |
|
absurb joined #minetest-dev |
| 01:15 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:12 |
|
Miner_48er joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:20 |
|
BrunoMine joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:21 |
|
AntumDeluge joined #minetest-dev |
| 02:57 |
|
ssieb joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:14 |
|
nepugia joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:17 |
|
Taoki joined #minetest-dev |
| 04:30 |
|
twoelk left #minetest-dev |
| 07:57 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:01 |
|
Beton joined #minetest-dev |
| 08:39 |
|
ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:39 |
|
nepugia joined #minetest-dev |
| 10:52 |
|
Icedream joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:06 |
|
df458 joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:08 |
|
Fixer joined #minetest-dev |
| 11:53 |
|
absurb joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:41 |
|
lapintosh joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:44 |
|
kilbith joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:51 |
|
calcul0n joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:51 |
|
nepugia joined #minetest-dev |
| 12:56 |
sfan5 |
merging #9437 in 5m |
| 12:56 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9437 -- GUIHyperText: Fix bug with UTF-8 chars in action name by kilbith |
| 13:31 |
|
df458 joined #minetest-dev |
| 13:32 |
|
Icedream joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:30 |
|
nepugia joined #minetest-dev |
| 14:54 |
|
Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 15:10 |
Jordach |
sfan5, one star fix for android pushed |
| 15:11 |
|
absurb_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:23 |
|
Andrey01 joined #minetest-dev |
| 16:33 |
Andrey01 |
Hello, still time a question: does anybody know what`s a source file whose code executes display an info when an user hovers over icons (ping, creative mode) of a server in the server list tab of the main menu? |
| 16:56 |
Krock |
I think you're looking for the server list tab file |
| 16:56 |
Krock |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/builtin/mainmenu/tab_online.lua |
| 16:57 |
Krock |
information is added by tooltip[] but that does not work on single list entries |
| 17:09 |
|
calcul0n_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:09 |
|
erlehmann joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:23 |
|
proller joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:39 |
rubenwardy |
made a class diagram: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9358#issuecomment-596111586 |
| 17:54 |
Krock |
rubenwardy: that would be a nice clean structure |
| 17:54 |
Krock |
thing is, most elements will need access to GUIFormSpec |
| 17:54 |
rubenwardy |
I would like to collect the reasons for that and account for it |
| 17:56 |
|
paramat joined #minetest-dev |
| 17:57 |
paramat |
if there is a meeting today i am around for the next 3 hours. an hour from now or later is best for me |
| 17:58 |
rubenwardy |
I'll be around for an hour and half more, roughly |
| 17:58 |
Krock |
yes, I'd like to do one, in 30 minutes would be preferable |
| 17:59 |
Krock |
according to the away status, most devs seem to be available already. don't hesitate to discuss 5.2.0 already :) |
| 18:00 |
rubenwardy |
I'd be up for it now, safest option |
| 18:01 |
rubenwardy |
!dev Meetings |
| 18:01 |
ShadowBot |
Meetings - Minetest Developer Wiki -- http://dev.minetest.net/Meetings |
| 18:05 |
paramat |
ok now is fine |
| 18:08 |
rubenwardy |
blockers: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc+label%3ABlocker |
| 18:08 |
rubenwardy |
milestone: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/milestone/15 |
| 18:09 |
rubenwardy |
sofar, nore, sfan5 |
| 18:10 |
rubenwardy |
ShadowNinja |
| 18:10 |
paramat |
i still have not gone through checking for stuff that needs to be done for 5.2.0, perhaps we can do that over the next week |
| 18:15 |
Krock |
okay, I'm in |
| 18:16 |
Krock |
most of the bugs should already be marked with milestones. add Blocker tags if these have to be merged into 5.2.0 |
| 18:16 |
Krock |
I think the android PR will have to wait for 5.3.0 |
| 18:17 |
Krock |
until the dependency issues and multicraft references are solved, right? |
| 18:18 |
Krock |
sfan5: how is #9471 a blocker? I think this glow is intended |
| 18:18 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9471 -- Builtin Item lighting is never updated |
| 18:18 |
Krock |
if other items aside light source nodes are affected, this would be a problem |
| 18:19 |
Krock |
the "glow" param is calculated client-side. the builtin_item activity in on_step does not matter there |
| 18:19 |
Krock |
maybe reduce the glow amount, but I don't see any more issues than that |
| 18:21 |
|
appgurueu joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:22 |
appgurueu |
Improved waypoint PR: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/9480 |
| 18:22 |
appgurueu |
(and also, again sorry to sfan5) |
| 18:22 |
appgurueu |
(for mixing) |
| 18:23 |
sfan5 |
Krock: yes I just realized |
| 18:23 |
sfan5 |
I remeber seeing buggy items, but that might've been just them being stuck in nodes |
| 18:25 |
sfan5 |
random items being lighter than the rest is extremely unexpected because the sourroundings are not light up |
| 18:26 |
sfan5 |
s/being lighter/glowing/ |
| 18:28 |
Krock |
maybe those should be made light_source / 2 to not look so weird |
| 18:28 |
rubenwardy |
I agree |
| 18:29 |
paramat |
fine for me |
| 18:29 |
paramat |
(reduced glow, that is) |
| 18:30 |
appgurueu |
Could my (image) waypoint PR be merged? |
| 18:30 |
Krock |
after 5.2.0 |
| 18:31 |
appgurueu |
Feature freeze currently? |
| 18:31 |
Krock |
looking toward starting it today |
| 18:31 |
appgurueu |
Then couldn't it be sneaked in? |
| 18:32 |
appgurueu |
Today? |
| 18:32 |
rubenwardy |
shame not to have scroll container |
| 18:32 |
rubenwardy |
I tried debugging the issue with item tooltips, but it's a bit gross |
| 18:32 |
Krock |
shame not to have the android rework |
| 18:32 |
appgurueu |
What needs to be reworked? |
| 18:33 |
rubenwardy |
I would consider the android rework a blocker |
| 18:33 |
rubenwardy |
well, saying that |
| 18:33 |
rubenwardy |
it's still far off given the crashes |
| 18:33 |
paramat |
err, i agree android PR should wait, removing blocker label ... |
| 18:33 |
appgurueu |
Any reason not to merge the two blockers? |
| 18:33 |
appgurueu |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3ABlocker |
| 18:34 |
|
kilbith joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:34 |
rubenwardy |
review needed |
| 18:34 |
Krock |
appgurueu: the point for "Blocker" is to mark PRs that must be merged until the next release due to gameplay limitations |
| 18:34 |
rubenwardy |
blocker is typically done on bad regressions or game breaking bugs |
| 18:34 |
kilbith |
>:( |
| 18:34 |
Krock |
the android PR is nice and all, but needs more work from both sides |
| 18:35 |
appgurueu |
Well, Jordach's PR already has one approval, so why not merge it? |
| 18:35 |
rubenwardy |
because that's not how the rules work |
| 18:35 |
Krock |
appgurueu: ffs please read the discussion. it's not done |
| 18:35 |
rubenwardy |
we should consider releasing 5.3.0 as soon as Android support is fixed |
| 18:35 |
rubenwardy |
in that case |
| 18:35 |
rubenwardy |
well - soon after |
| 18:35 |
Krock |
yes |
| 18:36 |
kilbith |
no scroll_container and no state-selection to style[] |
| 18:36 |
kilbith |
sucks |
| 18:37 |
appgurueu |
no image waypoints |
| 18:37 |
appgurueu |
no waypoint precision |
| 18:37 |
appgurueu |
no waypoint offset |
| 18:38 |
rubenwardy |
none of those are especially high priority |
| 18:38 |
appgurueu |
yeah |
| 18:38 |
rubenwardy |
scroll container and state selection are fairly high priority on the formspec rework list |
| 18:38 |
|
Electro_Cloud joined #minetest-dev |
| 18:38 |
rubenwardy |
scroll container still has a fairly big bug - scrolling with an item hovered will keep this selection and the tooltip until you move the mouse |
| 18:39 |
rubenwardy |
this is because the inventory list GUI element only updates the selection on mouse move, which doesn't happen during scrolling |
| 18:39 |
kilbith |
do you know how to fix that? |
| 18:39 |
Krock |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/commit/6958071f497c8f059429343339ad3818ed3cfed1#diff-90993ca3bb550ffc1c77a1578f3545d3L796 |
| 18:39 |
rubenwardy |
I have some ideas on how to fix it in an unplesant way |
| 18:40 |
paramat |
#9296 is not a blocker, however the other core devs may want that in 5.2.0, in which case we cannot freeze right now |
| 18:40 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9296 -- Add new Mapgen V7 floatland implementation by paramat |
| 18:40 |
kilbith |
as fot state selection it has 1 approval |
| 18:40 |
paramat |
you might want to add blocker to that, i am neutral |
| 18:40 |
kilbith |
but 5.2 without scroll_container would bother me definitely |
| 18:40 |
rubenwardy |
I can probably approve state selection this weekend, I hadn't gotten around to reviewing it |
| 18:41 |
Krock |
paramat: I'll test the floatlands PR later if you really want that in 5.2.0 bot tbh I don't see a urgent need for it |
| 18:42 |
Krock |
s/bot/but/ |
| 18:42 |
sfan5 |
agreed |
| 18:42 |
sfan5 |
if we may be releasing 5.3 soon after, floatlands isn't high priority for 5.2 |
| 18:43 |
appgurueu |
I've had a brief look at Monte's Android PR, and it seems fine to me. |
| 18:43 |
appgurueu |
Mostly the fact that he got rid of replaced the build script with a gradle config, |
| 18:43 |
Krock |
appgurueu: the "seems fine" approach caused enough issues in the past |
| 18:43 |
rubenwardy |
appgurueu: have you built it and tested it? |
| 18:43 |
appgurueu |
not yet |
| 18:44 |
sfan5 |
I have and the built apk crashed on startup |
| 18:44 |
sfan5 |
the build scripts changes are good though |
| 18:44 |
Krock |
I'll mark the important 5.3.0 PRs |
| 18:46 |
Krock |
sfan5: so it's likely a linkage/dependency issue? |
| 18:46 |
paramat |
i am neutral about having floatlands at all, so it is up to others =) will remove from milestone then |
| 18:46 |
kilbith |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/8658 is approved too |
| 18:46 |
kilbith |
and useful |
| 18:48 |
sfan5 |
Krock: dont think so, it crashed (or errored?) in actual minetest code |
| 18:48 |
kilbith |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/8676 approved |
| 18:48 |
appgurueu |
Not necessarily. |
| 18:48 |
paramat |
appgurueu stop wasting our time with nonsense |
| 18:49 |
appgurueu |
realthechnerds bug report is not detailed enough. |
| 18:49 |
appgurueu |
* tech |
| 18:49 |
Krock |
kilbith: I'd prefer to fix the open bugs for a sane 5.2.0 release rather than introducing potential new bugs |
| 18:50 |
appgurueu |
As said, I support that PR, but first I'll test it myself. |
| 18:50 |
kilbith |
this is exactly the lack of guts people are complaining about |
| 18:50 |
Krock |
that's a general opinion. both linked PRs worked fine, and no issues found |
| 18:50 |
kilbith |
merge this shit, we test it extensively during 2 weeks (that's enough) and your release will be sane |
| 18:50 |
appgurueu |
^ |
| 18:50 |
paramat |
app, be quiet, you are not competant enough to take part in this meeting |
| 18:51 |
appgurueu |
don't you judge my competence, paramat |
| 18:51 |
appgurueu |
also, I'm LMD |
| 18:51 |
Krock |
okay, let's go through the open issues for 5.2.0? |
| 18:51 |
Krock |
I'll note them down in the meeting nodes |
| 18:51 |
Krock |
*notse |
| 18:51 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
Yeah |
| 18:52 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
* notes |
| 18:53 |
paramat |
lmd you are not a competant engine dev or a core dev, and most of your comments here are disruptive nonsense. stop pretending to be a core dev |
| 18:54 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
I did not pretend to be a core dev |
| 18:54 |
paramat |
please someone kick them |
| 18:54 |
rubenwardy |
paramat: these meetings are not just for coredevs, and please don't gatekeep like that |
| 18:54 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
please paramat calm down |
| 18:54 |
rubenwardy |
however, saying "just merge it" isn't particularly helpful |
| 18:54 |
sfan5 |
competent* |
| 18:54 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
well, I will test Monte's PR |
| 18:54 |
sfan5 |
and please stop pointlessly arguing |
| 18:55 |
paramat |
i did not say they are only for core devs. the fact is this is pretentious disruption |
| 18:56 |
Krock |
okay, I'll test the sky fixes and expand the PR to merge it soon |
| 18:56 |
Krock |
the shaders problem needs action from dcbrwn in case they're around |
| 18:57 |
Krock |
if not, disable shaders on those entity types |
| 18:58 |
Krock |
I've seen some reports regarding the collision. nothing new, but the new PR is now set to 5.3.0 |
| 18:58 |
Krock |
after some tests I can say it works very good, but entity collisions aren't well tested yet |
| 18:59 |
Krock |
i.e. collisions with higher dtime values |
| 19:05 |
paramat |
close #9375 ? i have had no collision issues |
| 19:05 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9375 -- Reminder: Consider reverting collision tweak before 5.2.0 |
| 19:05 |
sfan5 |
agree |
| 19:06 |
Krock |
yes, close that. |
| 19:06 |
paramat |
doing |
| 19:06 |
kilbith |
I have these small tweaks improving the arm physics (less "lazyness") to ressemble more like MC' physics |
| 19:06 |
kilbith |
would that be accepted for 5.2? |
| 19:06 |
kilbith |
https://gist.github.com/kilbith/efcbfa726af148c819b9145db88cfe39 |
| 19:06 |
Krock |
I'd say so yes |
| 19:07 |
Krock |
it's only trivial parameter tweaking for something that's unlikely to break the gameplay |
| 19:07 |
kilbith |
it's mostly user feedbacks that are expected |
| 19:07 |
kilbith |
not bugs |
| 19:08 |
Krock |
I'm expecting this very patch originated from user feedback |
| 19:08 |
Krock |
s/expecting/assuming/ |
| 19:09 |
kilbith |
that was paramat 3 years ago wanting a "quicker" arm |
| 19:09 |
Krock |
okay, so what about minetest_game? is there anything special waiting, paramat ? |
| 19:10 |
Krock |
no too important bugfixes from what I can see |
| 19:10 |
sfan5 |
natural cotton is not planned for 5.2, is it? |
| 19:13 |
|
GreenDimond joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:14 |
Krock |
paramat: please check whether this fixes your on-join issue: https://krock-works.uk.to/u/patches/l_get_player_information-fix.diff |
| 19:14 |
sfan5 |
merging game#2614 in a few mins |
| 19:14 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2614 -- xpanes:remove unused textures by TumeniNodes |
| 19:15 |
Krock |
it's a dirty workaround but might just work as intended |
| 19:16 |
paramat |
yes nice, i agree the arm is currently too 'lazy' |
| 19:16 |
Krock |
or maybe just patch l_server.cpp so that it never returns early, but sets the "invalid" return values to zero or so |
| 19:17 |
paramat |
oh nice, an info fix, i will test that tonight, can make a PR if wanted |
| 19:17 |
paramat |
wild cotton is not needed for 5.2.0 |
| 19:18 |
Krock |
if it works, I'll push that as trivial bugfix. sub-zero RTT values are always handled the same way in the code (checked) |
| 19:19 |
paramat |
a workaround is ok for now. hm, marking #9352 as blocker, games crashing isnot good |
| 19:19 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9352 -- minetest.get_player_information sometimes return nil (running at mod load, in singleplayer) |
| 19:20 |
paramat |
'fix beds' would be nice but i am hopeless with that code game#2566 |
| 19:20 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2566 -- Fix beds by An0n3m0us |
| 19:22 |
paramat |
i +1ed craftguide but based on testing, do not fully understand the code. i guess is is not a blocker |
| 19:23 |
paramat |
.. based on testing, trust and the fact it is fairly harmless and self-contained. but it will need at least one core dev reviewing the code |
| 19:25 |
sfan5 |
paramat: although i would have preferred the set_meta solution the code works right now |
| 19:25 |
Krock |
I'm wondering more how someone would replace the MTG craft guide once it's merged |
| 19:25 |
Krock |
does the sfinv mod provide this function? |
| 19:26 |
kilbith |
why would anyone replace craftguide |
| 19:26 |
kilbith |
that's the best out there |
| 19:26 |
Krock |
kilbith: replace #2395 for your sake |
| 19:26 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/2395 -- Clean up database API and save the local map on an interval by ShadowNinja |
| 19:26 |
Krock |
game#2395 |
| 19:26 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2395 -- Carts: switching the drivers's yaw to the cart's by yquemener |
| 19:26 |
Krock |
ffs game#2396 |
| 19:27 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2396 -- Add (simpler) craftguide mod by pauloue |
| 19:27 |
kilbith |
oh yeah by the TRUE craftguide |
| 19:27 |
Krock |
so you'd probably go for sfinv.override_page to override it |
| 19:27 |
Krock |
unified_inventory ignores sfinv entirely so that's not a problem there |
| 19:28 |
kilbith |
not a big deal |
| 19:29 |
kilbith |
but still less gameplay value added if the progressive mode's gone |
| 19:32 |
|
Topic for #minetest-dev is now Minetest core development and maintenance. FEATURE FREEZE in effect. Minetest 5.1.1 released! Chit-chat goes to #minetest. http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/ http://dev.minetest.net/ |
| 19:33 |
Krock |
that'll be again a long changelog.. let's see.. |
| 19:37 |
paramat |
removing non-blocker feature PRs from 5.2.0 milestones ... #7924 #9411 |
| 19:37 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7924 -- [NO SQUASH] Allow binding dig, place actions to keys; remove LMB/RMB hardcoding by ClobberXD |
| 19:37 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9411 -- Add starting frame to `animated_image` by v-rob |
| 19:38 |
GreenXenith |
No mouse rebindings for 5.2.0? Damn. |
| 19:39 |
kilbith |
wait |
| 19:39 |
GreenXenith |
Looks like 5.3.0 will be just as anticipated as 5.2.0. |
| 19:39 |
kilbith |
#9411 *needs* to be in 5.2 |
| 19:39 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9411 -- Add starting frame to `animated_image` by v-rob |
| 19:39 |
kilbith |
clueless idiot |
| 19:40 |
Krock |
well then. testing tomorrow and merge if that has to be |
| 19:40 |
kilbith |
http://irc.minetest.net/minetest-dev/2020-03-06#i_5648811 |
| 19:41 |
GreenXenith |
If it would be a breaking change after 5.2 then it should be marked as a blocker, no? |
| 19:42 |
Krock |
for simplicity yes |
| 19:42 |
paramat |
k behave please |
| 19:43 |
paramat |
#9411 looks like a feature to me, there is no 'bug' label or any clue it is urgent in the first post |
| 19:43 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9411 -- Add starting frame to `animated_image` by v-rob |
| 19:44 |
Krock |
paramat: but it'll cause much useless hassle if not merged before 5.2.0 |
| 19:44 |
Andrey01 |
Thanks, @Krock |
| 19:44 |
paramat |
but i accept it may be, just explaining why i did that |
| 19:44 |
paramat |
oh ok, no problem |
| 19:45 |
Krock |
it would require much compatibility code in order to work for the last stable definition of the animated_image parameters |
| 19:46 |
|
benrob0329 joined #minetest-dev |
| 19:47 |
paramat |
ok. apparently i am a 'clueless idiot' for not knowing that even though there is no documentation at all of the need =) |
| 19:47 |
Andrey01 |
And other question: why do you inherit UnitSAO and TestSAO from ServerActiveObject classes and then inherit from them already LuaEntitySAO and PlayerSAO? I think it would be possible to do without them |
| 19:47 |
Krock |
maybe it was meant for me, since I changed the topic |
| 19:48 |
Krock |
Andrey01: old structure. I don't think there's any particular reason |
| 19:49 |
paramat |
kilbith, just a warning, you have now been very unpleasant twice in this channel, if this continues i will ban you from this channel (he is ignoring me but needs warning) |
| 19:50 |
paramat |
back later |
| 19:50 |
Krock |
paramat: directness like yours might also be interpreted as unpleasant FYI |
| 19:50 |
kilbith |
shut the hell up already |
| 19:50 |
Krock |
like my message as well.. |
| 19:51 |
kilbith |
talking about competence I can guarantee you'd never have a developer job in the real world |
| 19:52 |
benrob0329 |
Good God kilbith you really don't like making friends |
| 19:52 |
kilbith |
I only have a problem with this bitch |
| 19:53 |
rubenwardy |
Please chill it |
| 19:53 |
rubenwardy |
To both of you |
| 20:01 |
benrob0329 |
rubenwardy: What has to happen for the engine direction PR to not die? |
| 20:04 |
|
AndroUser2 joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:15 |
|
benrob0329 joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:17 |
|
Jdog joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:22 |
Krock |
https://dev.minetest.net/Changelog#5.1.0_.E2.86.92_5.2.0 |
| 20:22 |
sfan5 |
nice |
| 20:23 |
Krock |
I ignored most of the bugfixes that were needed after 5.2.0-dev introduced bugs |
| 20:26 |
rubenwardy |
That's fair |
| 20:26 |
rubenwardy |
I tend to add the bug fixer of regressions to the feature that added the regression |
| 20:27 |
Krock |
the credits might need updating sometime |
| 20:27 |
Krock |
this: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/master/builtin/mainmenu/tab_credits.lua |
| 20:45 |
|
nepugia joined #minetest-dev |
| 20:48 |
p_gimeno |
I've read #2395. I've wanted the same for advtrains. Second Life allows both, and I think it can be the way to go. One idea is to have a "magnetic" area: when the angle of the camera is close to being aligned with the angle of the cart, make it tend to that angle (but making it easy to "escape" by moving the mouse fast) |
| 20:48 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/2395 -- Clean up database API and save the local map on an interval by ShadowNinja |
| 20:49 |
p_gimeno |
when in that state, the camera angle would follow the vehicle angle |
| 20:50 |
p_gimeno |
err game#2395 |
| 20:50 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2395 -- Carts: switching the drivers's yaw to the cart's by yquemener |
| 20:56 |
Krock |
that was an accidental mention |
| 20:57 |
Krock |
also yes, camera needs to be updated, but in a delta value rather than absolute rotation |
| 20:58 |
p_gimeno |
I don't like that idea, if you're looking anywhere but forward you will get disconcerted by a 90° turn |
| 20:59 |
Krock |
that's what would happen IRL too |
| 20:59 |
Krock |
the move would be interpolated anyway so turning the head while it moves should be possible |
| 20:59 |
p_gimeno |
except IRL changes are not instant :) |
| 21:00 |
p_gimeno |
interpolated, maybe |
| 21:00 |
Krock |
imagine a zig-zag diagonal movement. that would be insane to watch |
| 21:00 |
Krock |
from what I've seen, minecraft does that too |
| 21:02 |
p_gimeno |
with my locking camera idea, if you're looking at the zigzag it won't be insane; if you're looking in the direction of movement letting the camera lock, it probably will |
| 21:04 |
benrob0329 |
Krock: do MTG carts still shift the camera offset so that you can't select the cart when going uphill? |
| 21:04 |
benrob0329 |
s/do/does |
| 21:04 |
benrob0329 |
^z |
| 21:05 |
Krock |
yes, I think that's still the case |
| 21:06 |
benrob0329 |
I wonder if the cart could be attached to a bone slightly above so that it shifts when rotating instead to match the player's position |
| 21:07 |
benrob0329 |
essentially moving the rotational axis |
| 21:09 |
benrob0329 |
What you'd end up with is an animated b3d file with the different rotations, and instead of manually setting the rotation it'd set the frame that the cart's on |
| 21:10 |
benrob0329 |
you could technically use that to smooth the change too but that's not the main thing it would be trying to fix |
| 21:42 |
|
AndroUser2 joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:48 |
|
Andrey01 joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:49 |
Andrey01 |
How to get names of all players on a server in the server list after core.start() call? |
| 21:51 |
|
calcul0n_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 21:53 |
|
absurb_ left #minetest-dev |
| 21:56 |
|
DS-minetest joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:20 |
|
kilbith joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:28 |
|
behalebabo joined #minetest-dev |
| 22:30 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
Andrey01: Could you elaborate? |
| 22:31 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
If you're looking for the serverlist JSON, it's at https://servers.minetest.net/list |
| 22:37 |
Andrey01 |
I want to output a tooltip with names of all players on any server in the server list when an user hovers over players count. How to know players names? |
| 22:37 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
Well, when that list is loaded, it stores player names as well. |
| 22:38 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
I suggest another option however: store it as a tree, so that players can see more by clicking "+" |
| 22:38 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
#minetest though? |
| 22:39 |
Andrey01 |
No, this concerns to the core |
| 22:40 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
Well, it actually resembles modding; it's just that you would have to make a PR & change the mainmenu files. |
| 22:41 |
DS-minetest |
the mainmenu belongs to builtin, not modding |
| 22:42 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
Yeah, it is builtin, but quite similar to modding |
| 22:43 |
Andrey01 |
Why are players names needed to be stored as a tree and what do you mean 'see more by clicking "+"'? |
| 22:44 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
Well, I consider tooltips impractical (how are mobile users supposed to use them?) |
| 22:45 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
In my designs, I lean towards using tables with "spoilers" |
| 22:45 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
See https://raw.githubusercontent.com/appgurueu/cmdlib/master/screenshot.png |
| 22:45 |
DS-minetest |
mobile players are supposed to swap to umobile, imo |
| 22:47 |
kilbith |
#9485 |
| 22:47 |
ShadowBot |
https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9485 -- Improve arm physics by kilbith |
| 22:47 |
DS-minetest |
i thought there was a recent pr for having all client names in main menu but i cant find it; currently there*s only this: https://github.com/minetest/minetest/blob/0e88176db8ce9f3fb631feb56bdd29d4ada054f5/doc/menu_lua_api.txt#L158-L170 |
| 22:47 |
Andrey01 |
Ok, but my question is how to get player names from a server at all? Does the modding API allow to do it? |
| 22:48 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
Yes, of course. |
| 22:49 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
In the mainmenu files, the one for the serverlist gets the list using a HTTP request, parses it using minetest.parse_json, and then creates a view using a formspec. |
| 22:49 |
appguru_aka_LMD |
All you have to do is modify that view. |
| 22:59 |
|
kilbith_ joined #minetest-dev |
| 23:21 |
|
nepugia joined #minetest-dev |
