Minetest logo

IRC log for #minetest-dev, 2019-12-26

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:56 Lone_Wolf joined #minetest-dev
01:49 Miner_48er joined #minetest-dev
04:22 AntumD joined #minetest-dev
05:22 fluxflux joined #minetest-dev
06:13 NoctisLabs joined #minetest-dev
06:21 ssieb joined #minetest-dev
07:41 NoctisLa1 joined #minetest-dev
08:39 ShadowNinja joined #minetest-dev
09:07 Beton joined #minetest-dev
09:19 Krock joined #minetest-dev
09:34 calcul0n joined #minetest-dev
10:45 proller joined #minetest-dev
11:26 proller joined #minetest-dev
11:32 Thomas-S joined #minetest-dev
11:59 Fixer joined #minetest-dev
12:00 df458 joined #minetest-dev
12:04 NoctisLabs joined #minetest-dev
12:04 proller joined #minetest-dev
13:34 CrazyDave joined #minetest-dev
13:35 CrazyDave left #minetest-dev
14:06 df458 joined #minetest-dev
15:14 realz joined #minetest-dev
15:21 realz joined #minetest-dev
16:26 df458 joined #minetest-dev
16:36 NoctisLabs joined #minetest-dev
17:01 Lone_Wolf joined #minetest-dev
17:13 fluxflux joined #minetest-dev
17:23 rubenwardy I suggest releasing 5.1.1 with as little fixes as necessary, and then aiming for 5.2.0 at the end of feb/march
17:23 rubenwardy that way we have time to fix the android port and polish some of the formspec changes
17:23 rubenwardy #9252
17:23 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/9252 -- Backport 5.1.1 by rubenwardy
17:24 Dargod joined #minetest-dev
17:38 p_gimeno f6de86c is pretty close to trivial I'd say
17:39 p_gimeno "Adjust position and rotation independently of whether it's visible"
17:40 p_gimeno that's how I read the patch
17:42 rubenwardy it depends on the former
17:47 p_gimeno it says it was broken by commit 81c2370
17:47 p_gimeno that one isn't listed in your list, and indeed it's complex
17:50 rubenwardy ahh
17:51 rubenwardy added
19:22 ssieb joined #minetest-dev
19:32 proller joined #minetest-dev
19:38 Lone_Wolf joined #minetest-dev
19:47 df458 joined #minetest-dev
19:54 ensonic joined #minetest-dev
19:58 calcul0n joined #minetest-dev
20:21 tomraceror joined #minetest-dev
20:48 ensonic joined #minetest-dev
20:51 Lone_Wolf joined #minetest-dev
21:49 TC01 joined #minetest-dev
21:58 TC01 joined #minetest-dev
22:07 Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev
22:19 proller joined #minetest-dev
22:30 Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev
22:52 Lone_Wolf joined #minetest-dev
23:42 Wuzzy If someone (wink, wink) would ever redo Minimal, what would be the minimal (pun not intended!) requirements?
23:43 rubenwardy with the same purpose, a demonstration of most API features
23:43 rubenwardy minimal is ok as-is, just doesn't show everything
23:44 Wuzzy https://forum.minetest.net/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=23802 good?
23:44 Wuzzy i was bored and added a lot of dummy nodes to test out drawtypes 🙂
23:44 rubenwardy sounds good
23:45 Wuzzy what i dont like about minimal is that its currently pretty messy code
23:45 Wuzzy i get that its meant to test the engine , but i dont think it does a good job at it atm
23:46 Wuzzy a lot of well-known bugs cannot be reproduced with it atm, simply due to lack of stuff
23:47 Wuzzy the worst part of minimal imo is the "experimental" mod. very messy and some of the code looks like ancient legacy that has no relevance anymore. at least thats what it looks like to me
23:49 Wuzzy rubenwardy: but the formspec test is good, this looks pretty comprehensive as well 🙂

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext