Minetest logo

IRC log for #minetest-dev, 2018-11-03

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
01:39 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
03:20 Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev
04:44 jas_ #4256
04:44 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/4256 -- Fade and sound playback with gain <= 0 delete the handle (for mute)
04:44 jas_ i will continue testing as im not 100 percent sure
04:45 jas_ but still, minetest.fade isnt suitable for (un)muting
08:32 proller joined #minetest-dev
08:47 troller joined #minetest-dev
09:14 proller joined #minetest-dev
09:27 YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev
09:58 troller joined #minetest-dev
10:28 proller joined #minetest-dev
10:34 proller joined #minetest-dev
10:39 Wuzzy joined #minetest-dev
11:17 Lunatrius joined #minetest-dev
11:25 proller joined #minetest-dev
11:25 troller joined #minetest-dev
11:25 Gael-de-Sailly joined #minetest-dev
11:37 troller joined #minetest-dev
11:40 proller__ joined #minetest-dev
11:44 proller joined #minetest-dev
11:57 troller joined #minetest-dev
12:10 proller joined #minetest-dev
12:42 T4im joined #minetest-dev
12:51 proller joined #minetest-dev
13:14 Fixer joined #minetest-dev
13:22 proller joined #minetest-dev
13:30 calcul0n joined #minetest-dev
13:42 Krock joined #minetest-dev
14:09 calcul0n joined #minetest-dev
14:32 Jordach joined #minetest-dev
15:23 Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev
16:17 Gael-de-Sailly joined #minetest-dev
16:21 paramat joined #minetest-dev
16:45 proller joined #minetest-dev
17:28 paramat some android PRs are coming in attending to the blockers, please review
17:34 * VanessaE growls at paramat
17:39 paramat can anyone help with this " I would like to verify that NDEBUG is in fact present for release builds. It should be, otherwise something else is wrong but this still needs to be verified." https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7525#issuecomment-435605854
17:40 p_gimeno hmm... add "assert(false);" at the top of main() and see?
17:41 p_gimeno or even #ifndef NDEBUG \n # error NDEBUG not set \n #endif
17:42 sfan5 #error something  is definitely the easiest way
17:45 rubenwardy That's not a fix, that's hiding the problem
17:45 rubenwardy Please only merge that into backport
17:45 paramat i know :) but no-one is coding the fix
17:45 paramat and it can be done later
17:47 rubenwardy It won't be done later
17:48 rubenwardy Well fine, add it to the list of graphics issues
17:51 paramat hm, it's certainly better to fix it properly, i'm just concerned that won't get done. that issue has gone nowhere for months. well, at least the fix can be backported if done
18:32 Krock !tell paramat Where's the second disapproval? https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7833#issuecomment-435609366
18:32 ShadowBot Krock: O.K.
18:33 Krock !tell paramat If you think that were me - the code only needs a few changes, it's not a PR disapprobal
18:33 ShadowBot Krock: O.K.
18:38 VanessaE whoa whoa whoa
18:38 VanessaE I'm sorry, now I gotta say something
18:39 VanessaE paramat:  that last reply was just plain unacceptable
18:41 sfan5 "Neglect closure" a day after the PR was proposed
18:41 sfan5 wew
18:44 Krock wew indeed. wrote a statement
18:47 p_gimeno looks like paramat is pissed of based on his previous experience with this guy, kind of understandable but maybe he should just recuse himself from participating in these
18:47 VanessaE tenplus1 has been a decent, well-meaning contrib to this project for a while now.
18:48 VanessaE to chase him off just....  I have no words.
18:54 Fixer_ joined #minetest-dev
19:04 YuGiOhJCJ joined #minetest-dev
19:10 paramat joined #minetest-dev
19:31 epoch_ joined #minetest-dev
20:33 Jordach joined #minetest-dev
21:36 crazyR I dont know more than what ive read in that PR... but from reading that PR... seems personal opinion of the author has impaired paramats judgment in that particular PR. Regardless of history between 2 people. as a reviewer paramat should be impartial when reviewing.. *just my 2 cents
21:36 crazyR *each pr should be judged on its own merit i think i ment to say
21:40 behalebabo joined #minetest-dev
21:41 paramat nope, my review of that PR and my requests would have been identical whoever wrote it and however they behaved. the other stuff about behaviour is independent
21:43 paramat putting irritation aside, here are the remaining issues https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/7833#issuecomment-435616837
21:44 paramat those 5 issues are valid
21:45 VanessaE paramat: I'm sorry, but just no.  I think you crossed the line.   or to put it another way... had you made those comments to me, I'd have walked away too, and you know how persistent I can be.
21:49 paramat you haven't been reviewing his PRs over the last few years though,
21:49 VanessaE no, I have not.  but I have seen the results of his efforts.
21:57 paramat so you don't know that i am actually stating the truth about his behaviour :)
21:57 VanessaE ...
21:58 sfan5 "my review of that PR and my requests would have been identical whoever wrote it" / "you haven't been reviewing his PRs over the last few years though"
21:58 VanessaE stating the truth, you may be, but you still went way too far.,
21:58 sfan5 isn't that a direction contraction
21:58 sfan5 contradiction*
22:01 proller joined #minetest-dev
22:07 paramat i see no contradiction, but nevermind :) vanessa i was quite restrained actually, no personal insults, fairly civil
22:07 * VanessaE shrugs
22:09 paramat anyway, closing it was wrong, i was irritated. this is what years of uncooperative behaviour and trying to tolerate it does
22:10 paramat not just me, so-far was also irritated by his contribution behaviour a few years back
22:12 Ruslan1 joined #minetest-dev
22:13 VanessaE you're missing a crucial point:  it isn't just one message I'm talking about, it's the whole barrage.  6 in a row, AFTER he walked away and closed?
22:14 behalebabo joined #minetest-dev
22:14 Jordach joined #minetest-dev
22:19 paramat read the comments after his close. the first deals with my irritation, the rest are not rants and are technical points
22:19 VanessaE I did.
22:19 VanessaE you repeated yourseld.
22:19 VanessaE f*
22:19 proller joined #minetest-dev
22:20 paramat in the first comment only, not 6
22:20 VanessaE yse yse, but you simply did NOT need to reply at all.
22:20 VanessaE yes**
22:20 paramat it's unhealthy to bottle in deep irritation, that's what caused this in the first place :)
22:23 sofar I may have been irritated in the past with tenplus1, but honestly at this point I'd try and focus on cooperation as much as possible
22:23 sofar identify acceptable and wanted elements in a PR, work on a solution together etc.
22:23 paramat yeah
22:23 sofar ( I didnt read the thread )
22:23 VanessaE you want to vent irritation, go find a punching bag.
22:23 paramat see my later comments
22:25 paramat nah, if someone is extremely difficult, they need to be told, as long as it's reasonably civil
22:25 sofar my preference is always to leave PRs open until the desired outcome is reached
22:26 sofar closed PRs means submitters are no longer attached and will just vaporize
22:26 paramat yes, my mistake
22:26 sofar I've made so many mistakes myself :)
22:27 sofar I just replied to a forum thread earlier today, for instance!
22:27 sofar XD
22:30 Cornelia joined #minetest-dev
22:47 sofar can I be honest? that PR is a disaster to begin with
22:48 sofar I'm reading the code and 50 lines changed while 3 lines of functionality are the actual core of the change
22:48 sofar and half of that isn't even properly mentioned in the summary
22:49 sofar PR's that start with "rewrite X" and "to fix Y" are pure garbage to begin with
22:49 sofar if Y needs fixing, submit a fix to Y, and don't pull in 30+ lines of rewrite with it
22:49 sofar [/rant]
22:50 sofar "honey I fixed the plumbing!" -> house burnt down
22:54 paramat yeah, the bugfix needs to be separate, as i requested :)
22:56 paramat also the bug isn't explained and there isn't a link to an issue, so we don't really know what is being fixed and what changes attend to the bug
22:57 paramat but i'm going to try to extract any useful bugfix (if there is one) out of this
23:02 paramat i think he redoes code for his own use, then gets butthurt when we point out the mistakes and how it's wrong for MT, so then ignores some issues, won't answer questions, the usual behaviour as before :)
23:16 paramat the really irritating behaviour is the 'going silent' on an issue or a question, would much prefer he refuses, or argues :)
23:19 Jordach joined #minetest-dev
23:23 crazyR unless there is some other convo that i've not been privy too... i dont see how he got but hurt... no bodt is telling  you that your "opinion/points" are wrong regarding the PR.... simply the way you handled it.   I think... thats my impression anyhow
23:24 epoch joined #minetest-dev
23:25 crazyR any how, its late im going spending some time with the missus, i hope you guys can resolve your diffrences.... it never ends well when contributers and devs fall out
23:37 paramat well ... you wrote above: "I dont know more than what ive read in that PR.", and i'm referring to the history of his behaviour in my 'butthurt' comment. tenplus can resolve this by being more cooperative, i would welcome that
23:41 paramat your judgement is actually very limited if you know very little about the topic. if you knew more you might somewhat sympathise with me and understand how irritating it is :)

| Channels | #minetest-dev index | Today | | Google Search | Plaintext