Time  Nick         Message
00:30 paramat      i'll probably merge #7534 in 2-3 hours as it's good work and will probably suffer from conflicts if not merged before tomorrow EU time
00:30 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7534 -- Lua API formatting and grammar fixes by pauloue
00:49 paramat      the paths changes in that are correct now i look at them more carefully
03:15 paramat      merging #7534
03:15 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7534 -- Lua API formatting and grammar fixes by pauloue
03:19 paramat      done
09:11 nerzhul      can someone do more tests on #7512 please ? i need to ensure nothing will break
09:11 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7512 -- Lua templating reading (part 4): s16, v2s16, v2f by nerzhul
09:12 nerzhul      rubenwardy: i started to generize #7519 (only the client pointer storage currently)
09:12 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7519 -- Add server to client weather communication by nerzhul
14:47 rubenwardy   grrr
14:47 rubenwardy   the os.temppath() API changed
14:47 rubenwardy   there's no longer a trailing /
14:57 rubenwardy   actually
14:57 rubenwardy   wth
15:01 rubenwardy   nvm
16:21 nerzhul      Krock if you get time, can you re-test/verify/approve #7512 please ?
16:21 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7512 -- Lua templating reading (part 4): s16, v2s16, v2f by nerzhul
16:38 Krock        looks good overall. will test
16:41 Krock        #7521 is also ready for re-review. The lua_api.txt conflict should be trivial
16:41 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7521 -- Implement ChatMessage into the API by SmallJoker
17:21 paramat      +1 for #6587
17:21 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6587 -- Optimize entity-entity collision by numberZero
17:22 paramat      ugh
17:22 rubenwardy   bit late, paramat
17:22 rubenwardy   already merged
17:22 paramat      #7539
17:22 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7539 -- Revert 6587 - Optimize entity-entity collision by lhofhansl
17:23 paramat      putting the original PR number in the thread title confused me :)
19:11 Krock        rubenwardy: could you please test #6497 if you've got some free time?
19:11 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6497 -- Move register_on_modchannel_signal() by jastevenson303
19:11 Krock        * #7497
19:11 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7497 -- guiFormspecMenu: Allow fraction values for container[] by SmallJoker
20:03 paramat      numberzero is ok with a revert so will merge in 5mins #7539
20:03 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7539 -- Revert 6587 - Optimize entity-entity collision by lhofhansl
20:30 paramat      oops forgot again, merging
20:31 paramat      done
20:54 paramat      :)
20:56 paramat      Shara game#2167 updated and tested, see screenshots, are you ok with a merge?
20:56 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2167 -- Fence rails: Add fence rail textures by paramat
20:58 Shara        paramat: Give me a little while and will check
20:58 Shara        But pretty sure I'm fine with it :)
20:59 paramat      ok
21:06 nerzhul      merging #7512 (lint is fixed)
21:06 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7512 -- Lua templating reading (part 4): s16, v2s16, v2f by nerzhul
21:06 nerzhul      Thanks Krock
21:06 nerzhul      i need more time to review your chat PR but the general thing is good
21:07 Shara        paramat: looks good
21:07 nerzhul      what is the problem with collisions ?
21:09 paramat      thanks
21:09 Krock        nerzhul: performance regression
21:19 paramat      merging game#2167 in a min
21:19 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2167 -- Fence rails: Add fence rail textures by paramat
21:21 paramat      merging
21:24 paramat      done
21:24 paramat      btw game#2150
21:24 ShadowBot    https://github.com/minetest/minetest_game/issues/2150 -- Beds: Add white simple and fancy beds by paramat
21:25 nerzhul      Krock okay
22:54 paramat      i might move chests into a new .lua file in MTG default, maybe tonight, any objections?
22:54 paramat      they clutter up nodes.lua
22:54 Shara        none from me
22:56 rubenwardy   should be a separate mod
22:56 * rubenwardy cries
22:57 Shara        hahaha
22:58 paramat      heh
22:58 Shara        separate file already makes it more manageable
22:59 paramat      i guess it's non-trivial to make it a separate mod. well anyway could be done later
22:59 paramat      i feel like moving focus to new games instead of trying to completely fix MTG (which is near-impossible) :)
23:01 Shara        Well you know I would love to see more "official" games
23:01 Shara        But there is the usual problem there... until we make some
23:01 paramat      yeah
23:17 rubenwardy   fixing MTG helps with new games
23:17 rubenwardy   currently it's impossible to have a fixed new game and also keep compatibilty with MTG
23:18 rubenwardy   by having default split up, it's easier to make mods depend on only what they need and thus more likely to be compatible
23:19 Shara        Same thoughts. It is really not easy right now to make "a new game" unless you build from MTG, and then you mostly just get an edited MTG with extra mods tacked on.
23:20 rubenwardy   exactly
23:22 paramat      well, i don't think MTG is a good base for a game, best start fresh
23:23 rubenwardy   no
23:23 rubenwardy   that's not the point
23:23 paramat      even if MTG was 'improved' in some way it still has many aspects that should have been done differently but can't be changed due to what relies on it
23:23 rubenwardy   the point isn't reusing MTG mods as such, it's keeping compatibility with mods aimed for MTG
23:24 paramat      oh ok
23:24 rubenwardy   the former is good to
23:24 rubenwardy   ie: stairs/doors/carts/etc are pretty good and independent of game style
23:24 rubenwardy   mostly
23:24 rubenwardy   well, doors is meh
23:26 paramat      anyway, i might try to create at least 1 new game
23:27 paramat      MTG core devs have the skills needed so i almost feel like saying: every dev, make a new game, big or small, be the dictator of that game and avoid official dev workflow for more speed
23:30 paramat      i want to spend less time on MTG and core dev time is limited, so i feel we need to avoid non-essentials (like beds in all wool colours :))
23:32 paramat      the ABMs in MTG really pee me off :)
23:33 Shara        Seems to make more sense for people to work together...
23:34 Shara        For any game to become official to any extent it needs more than one person working on it.
23:34 Shara        Because otehrwise losing that person means losing any meaningful support for that game
23:35 Shara        We also all have different skills/interests
23:55 paramat      luckily you misunderstand :)
23:55 paramat      sorry if i was unclear