Time Nick Message 02:09 rdococ #7421 should be fairly trivial 02:09 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7421 -- on_grant and on_revoke callback bug 11:04 ANAND Greetings! I'm trying to build the NMPR version; it requires jThread which I've successfully built. How do I make 'make' (the application) detect jThread (located in ~/jthread)? 11:27 sfan5 what even is the "nmpr" version? 11:30 ANAND Network Multi-Player Release (dev.minetest.net/Core_Architecture) 11:46 sfan5 uh huh 11:46 sfan5 looks like it expects jthread to be installed system-wide 11:46 sfan5 you'll need to edit the Makefile 11:48 ANAND I see... 12:00 ANAND um... sorry, but what exactly do I edit in the Makefile to enable system-wide installation? :) 12:01 sfan5 no 12:01 sfan5 you edit the makefile to look for jthread in ~/jthread instead 12:03 nerzhul yeah ola for sfan5 :D 12:08 ANAND Ah, you mean MT's Makefile. I was looking into jThread's... :P 12:36 Wuzzy https://lpaste.net/raw/2738617915552038912 12:37 Wuzzy this is what happens why i try to start a game in 0.5.0-dev 12:37 Wuzzy 9ca37d86a3f8fd35150880e3c64cb81796430d68 12:57 rubenwardy was fixed, local error ^ 13:27 nerzhul yeah 14:18 lisac #7008 14:18 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7008 -- Allow CSMs to register a function on keypress by lisacvuk 19:30 Krock So what are we going to do with these two crash issues in 0.4.17? 19:31 sfan5 fix them and release 0.4.17.1 19:34 Krock yes, same. #6092 can be fixed by backporting 014a1a080. However, what are we going to do with the deprecated log crash? 19:34 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6092 -- Game crashes when up or down arrow keys are pressed while in pause menu 19:34 Krock Various solutions exist but nothing's decided yet 19:38 Krock just leaving this in the channel to not lose much time, since it might be the only reason why few servers are afraid of updating 19:48 sfan5 Krock: backport the fix? 19:48 sfan5 doesn't that work? 19:55 Krock Yes, so #6708 would be handled afterwards - and not as a solution for this crash 19:55 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6708 -- Add file and line to NodeDef field deprecation warning by rubenwardy 19:55 Krock will open a fix PR 21:11 rubenwardy lol 21:11 rubenwardy why 0.4.17.1 but not 0.4.16.1? 21:12 paramat 0.4.18 is fine for me 21:14 nerzhul did i said hmmmm is ridiculous because i'm not a forum admin i have no moderator status either ? xD 21:15 nerzhul yeah i'm late, i know 21:17 rubenwardy seems very silly to introduce it for a patch to 0.4.17 when 17 is a patch to 16 21:19 nerzhul i failed to solve the android linking issue in 0.4.17 but i should try to workaround proposed on the issue 21:19 paramat 17 doesn't seem a patch as it's a year on, it also has some non-bugfixes 21:19 paramat but 0.4.17.1 is indeed more of a patch 21:20 Krock nerzhul, would be glad if it could be added to the PR too 21:20 twoelk patch 16, patch 17, patch 18, sounds like counting puddles by treading into them 21:20 rubenwardy no, as a bug fix release it is 21:20 Krock .17 is our current patch. the tailing .1 is now like in freeminer, called tweak :3 21:21 rubenwardy wow, look at me trying to convince myself that our version system has any sanity in it 21:21 paramat well, no need to be strict with naming, 0.4.17 just seems right, 0.4.16.1 does not for a release a year on 21:22 rubenwardy that is what it is though, it's not a full release 21:22 nerzhul in fact, a release is a release in a devel process 21:22 nerzhul release => publish 21:22 nerzhul the version should reflect what we do 21:24 paramat also everyone is now used to it as 0.4.17, too late 21:24 sfan5 not that we aren't following the semver spec 21:24 sfan5 s/not/note/ 21:24 rubenwardy yeah 21:24 rubenwardy I think it should be 0.4.18 21:24 nerzhul it's 0.4.18 21:25 rubenwardy however I do think we should switch to semvar 21:25 nerzhul we can do that for 0.5 if needed to be more agiles on patches 21:25 rubenwardy we will almost certainly need to make patch releases for 0.5 21:25 sfan5 rubenwardy: it should be 0.4.17.1 because we aren't following the spec 21:26 sfan5 4 is the major ver, 17 the minor version, 1 would be the patch 21:26 sfan5 since we've always had this constant 0. prefix in the beginning 21:26 rubenwardy then the 0. is pointless 21:26 rubenwardy :/ 21:26 sfan5 the 0. is pointless in our current versioning scheme 21:26 rubenwardy that being said 21:27 rubenwardy maybe if we do add this then we can just drop the 0. at some point 21:28 nerzhul +1 21:28 rubenwardy so go ahead with 0.4.17.1 21:28 rubenwardy hopefully someone will "accidentally" get rid of the 0. 21:28 rubenwardy in future 21:32 Krock paramat, https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7419#issuecomment-395892293 when there's a duplicate, we close the newer issue unless it contains more relevant information. #6798 is the same bug, just now in 0.4.17 instead of our master branch 21:32 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6798 -- Fatal error in void log_deprecated() when 'deprecated_lua_api_handling = log or error' 21:32 rubenwardy 0.5.0.0 🤔 21:33 Krock half way to 1.0 21:35 rdococ 0.10.0.0* 21:36 Krock thanks rdococ 21:46 rubenwardy guys, I think we need to switch to svn https://i.rubenwardy.com/bbk63.png 21:49 Fixer_ to cvs 21:53 paramat Krock, ok :) 21:55 paramat yes i agree to dropping the 0. go to 5.0.0 22:01 paramat added new label 'PR open but not on Github' for #6898 etc. 22:01 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/6898 -- Allow distinguishing mods by modpack by pgimeno 22:01 sfan5 IMO we don't need a label for every tiny thing 22:01 sfan5 if the pr is considered worthy enough, someone should reopen it by pushing the changes to their own fork 22:02 paramat that's necessary as the PR gets closed when the user moves 22:02 nerzhul yeah this label is useless 22:02 nerzhul a PR is a PR, this category ahs no sense 22:02 paramat this will happen often and PRs will get forgotten otherwise 22:02 nerzhul the user not on github relation is not interesting 22:03 nerzhul also if user doesn't want to defend or answer our questions on GH why open the PR ? 22:03 sfan5 one (or two?) times is not "often" 22:04 sfan5 either way, does someone want to adopt that pr? 22:06 Fixer_ that PR should allow selecting modpack to play properly when there are mods/many-modpacks in /mods 22:16 paramat will merge #7355 in 5 mins 22:16 ShadowBot https://github.com/minetest/minetest/issues/7355 -- Mapgen flags: Add 'biomes' global mapgen flag by paramat 22:23 paramat merging 22:25 paramat merged 23:01 p_gimeno 6898 is more specifically about allowing several mods with the same name to exist in different modpacks without conflicts or any automatic arbitrary resolution 23:04 p_gimeno in other words, about letting world.mt specify the full path where to load the mod from, and the user choose the exact mod to load