Time Nick Message 00:05 Gael-de-Sailly paramat: I've started coding for mapgen presets 00:06 Gael-de-Sailly (only gui for now) 00:08 Roger9_ I read of in a closed issue for colored text a possible "color stack" where colors could be pushed and popped, and the top color would be used... did that ever make it into the official release? 19:02 paramat rubenwardy please could you ban this account? https://github.com/minetest/minetest/pull/6839#issuecomment-374196006 19:12 paramat oh and https://github.com/kilbith3 just remembered he has 3 accounts 21:39 nerzhul why banning, there is nothing offensive here 21:44 sofar I agree with bannning - its ban evasion 22:13 celeron55 well, having a last say after banning in PRs is reasonable in my opinion as it's obviously useful for the project 22:14 celeron55 but he shouldn't use that account for anything else 22:14 celeron55 any offensive comment or talk in a PR that isn't his and i'll get my banhammer 22:18 celeron55 in finland we have this thing called herrasmiessäännöt 22:19 Fixer harrasmentsmth? 22:20 celeron55 no 22:20 celeron55 google translate will give you a literal translation which doesn't mean much 22:21 celeron55 there's no good translation for this really 22:21 Fixer aha 22:21 Fixer okay 22:25 celeron55 it basically means "(using) an unofficial / made up / created-on-the-fly ruleset to be accomodating of others" 22:33 sofar well, ban evasion rules exist in order to avoid the whole idea that you can just break the rules and get away with it 22:35 sfan5 I'm conflicted between a consistent stance on ban evasion and the reasonable purpose it serves in this case 22:35 celeron55 as it stands, the only reason kilbith has a technically infinite organization-wide ban is that it is literally the only thing github supports 22:35 celeron55 give it some slack 22:36 sfan5 i'd rather go with the "don't ban" approach since he has not used the opportunity of a second account to continue his harrassment / trolling 22:36 paramat ok i should clarify :] i have no problem with his latest comment, it's actually welcome as it helps the feature. but since he has been banned, all his accounts should be banned, otherwise he isn't banned 22:37 celeron55 he can just continue making accounts, it's worthless 22:38 paramat yes good point 22:38 sofar so we don't ban at all, effectively 22:38 celeron55 the only way to stop this would be to be able to set some kind of wildcard name bans and ip bans 22:39 paramat however currently he isn't banned =} 22:39 sofar failing to have good tools to execute a ban isn't the same as stating he is banned 22:39 celeron55 it's easier to just delete the posts than to ban him once per post 22:39 sofar *not 22:40 celeron55 i mean i agree, this is ridiculous 22:40 paramat so i would ban current accounts, then just not bother banning future ones unless there is unpleasantness 22:40 celeron55 but i'm not going to spend my time banning each nick individually just to state a point 22:40 celeron55 if rubenwardy wants to, fine 22:41 paramat yes ok, no pressure 22:43 celeron55 and if someone finds that to be offensive against themselves, call github and tell them their moderation tools suck 22:46 celeron55 now that github has basically been made an every day thing, i bet the github killer will be basically github but with moderation tools 22:46 celeron55 and the way it will gain projects is this exactly 22:46 celeron55 it's only logical 22:46 celeron55 unless github steps up their game 22:49 celeron55 github is still basically modeled after a mailing list, in every aspect 22:52 paramat i don't like the addition of social-network type comment reaction emoticons, seems to lower the quality of discussion 22:56 celeron55 they don't bother me too much, but probably don't really help 22:56 celeron55 they're probably just trying to make it feel like you're getting more responses 22:58 celeron55 it's literally just a mouse click, so you're literally counting how many mouse clicks you got